Westlake Corporation (WLK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLK | $75.87 | -0.80% | 9.7B | -54.19 | -$1.40 | +2.83% |
| LIN | $515.73 | +0.68% | 238.6B | 30.64 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $333.13 | +3.17% | 82.2B | 32.07 | $10.39 | +0.95% |
| ECL | $276.29 | +2.84% | 77.7B | 37.43 | $7.38 | +1.02% |
| APD | $278.73 | -1.32% | 62B | 21.70 | $12.84 | +2.59% |
| PPG | $120.98 | +2.79% | 27B | 15.74 | $7.69 | +2.35% |
| SQM | $75.58 | -1.20% | 21.6B | 26.46 | $2.86 | +1.35% |
| IFF | $75.83 | +1.50% | 19.4B | 23.47 | $3.23 | +2.09% |
| DD | $137.82 | -1.56% | 18.6B | 53.65 | $2.57 | +1.68% |
| ALB | $147.84 | -1.43% | 17.4B | 63.18 | $2.34 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
WLK vs LIN Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 238.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while LIN trades at $515.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check LIN's competition here
WLK vs SHW Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SHW trades at $333.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SHW's competition here
WLK vs ECL Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ECL trades at $276.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ECL's competition here
WLK vs APD Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while APD trades at $278.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check APD's competition here
WLK vs PPG Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while PPG trades at $120.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check PPG's competition here
WLK vs SQM Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SQM trades at $75.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SQM's competition here
WLK vs IFF Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while IFF trades at $75.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check IFF's competition here
WLK vs DD Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while DD trades at $137.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 53.65. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check DD's competition here
WLK vs ALB Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ALB trades at $147.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 63.18. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ALB's competition here
WLK vs RPM Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while RPM trades at $109.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check RPM's competition here
WLK vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SOLS trades at $86.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 129.44. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SOLS's competition here
WLK vs ESI Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ESI trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ESI's competition here
WLK vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while AXTA trades at $34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check AXTA's competition here
WLK vs NEU Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while NEU trades at $790.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check NEU's competition here
WLK vs SSL Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SSL trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SSL's competition here
WLK vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ALTM's competition here
WLK vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check IKNX's competition here
WLK vs PRM Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while PRM trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check PRM's competition here
WLK vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while BCPC trades at $169.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check BCPC's competition here
WLK vs SXT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SXT trades at $120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SXT's competition here
WLK vs CBT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CBT trades at $91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CBT's competition here
WLK vs FUL Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while FUL trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check FUL's competition here
WLK vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while HWKN trades at $165.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check HWKN's competition here
WLK vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while AVNT trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check AVNT's competition here
WLK vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while WDFC trades at $244.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check WDFC's competition here
WLK vs CC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CC trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CC's competition here
WLK vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check LTHM's competition here
WLK vs ASH Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ASH trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ASH's competition here
WLK vs KWR Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while KWR trades at $153.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check KWR's competition here
WLK vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while NGVT trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check NGVT's competition here
WLK vs MTX Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while MTX trades at $78.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check MTX's competition here
WLK vs OLN Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while OLN trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -26.91. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check OLN's competition here
WLK vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while IOSP trades at $83.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check IOSP's competition here
WLK vs PQG Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check PQG's competition here
WLK vs REX Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while REX trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check REX's competition here
WLK vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ECVT trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ECVT's competition here
WLK vs ODC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ODC trades at $98.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ODC's competition here
WLK vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while LWLG trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -52.44. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check LWLG's competition here
WLK vs SCL Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SCL trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -88.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SCL's competition here
WLK vs CCF Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CCF's competition here
WLK vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while GPRE trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check GPRE's competition here
WLK vs KOP Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 843.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while KOP trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check KOP's competition here
WLK vs KRO Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 755.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while KRO trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check KRO's competition here
WLK vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ALTO trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ALTO's competition here
WLK vs OEC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while OEC trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check OEC's competition here
WLK vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while GEVO trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check GEVO's competition here
WLK vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while HDSN trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check HDSN's competition here
WLK vs CMT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CMT trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CMT's competition here
WLK vs FSI Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while FSI trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 106.67. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check FSI's competition here
WLK vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while NTIC trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 831.00. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check NTIC's competition here
WLK vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while LOOP trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check LOOP's competition here
WLK vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check VNTR's competition here
WLK vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while YMAT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check YMAT's competition here
WLK vs SNES Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while SNES trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check SNES's competition here
WLK vs GURE Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while GURE trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check GURE's competition here
WLK vs TSE Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check TSE's competition here
WLK vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CNEY trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CNEY's competition here
WLK vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 277.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while CRKN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check CRKN's competition here
WLK vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check HGASW's competition here
WLK vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLK has daily volatility of 3.86 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
WLK vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
WLK vs KRA Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check KRA's competition here
WLK vs KMG Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check KMG's competition here
WLK vs ARG Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ARG's competition here
WLK vs TREC Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check TREC's competition here
WLK vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check AMRS's competition here
WLK vs ZY Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check ZY's competition here
WLK vs GCP Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check GCP's competition here
WLK vs FOE Comparison June 2026
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 9.7B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $75.87, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of -54.19, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.Check FOE's competition here