Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMN | $71.95 | -4.42% | 8.4B | 21.17 | $3.46 | +4.57% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $32.57 | -1.99% | 23.8B | -8.24 | -$4.00 | +4.27% |
| LYB | $61.95 | -2.13% | 20.2B | -29.53 | -$2.12 | +6.62% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CE | $51.53 | -4.17% | 5.7B | -5.27 | -$9.86 | +0.23% |
| MEOH | $55.28 | -1.73% | 4.3B | -76.51 | -$0.73 | +1.33% |
| HUN | $12.95 | -18.53% | 2.3B | -7.01 | -$1.88 | +3.91% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAK | $3.36 | -9.92% | 1.3B | -0.74 | -$4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EMN vs SHLM Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SHLM's competition here
EMN vs DOW Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while DOW trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN and DOW have similar daily volatility (4.33).Check DOW's competition here
EMN vs LYB Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while LYB trades at $61.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LYB's competition here
EMN vs UNVR Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check UNVR's competition here
EMN vs CE Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while CE trades at $51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CE's competition here
EMN vs MEOH Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while MEOH trades at $55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -76.51. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MEOH's competition here
EMN vs HUN Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while HUN trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HUN's competition here
EMN vs AACQU Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AACQU's competition here
EMN vs BAK Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while BAK trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check BAK's competition here
EMN vs TROX Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while TROX trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TROX's competition here
EMN vs LXU Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 843.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while LXU trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LXU's competition here
EMN vs WLKP Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 824M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while WLKP trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WLKP's competition here
EMN vs RYAM Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while RYAM trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check RYAM's competition here
EMN vs ASIX Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 573.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while ASIX trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 59.11. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASIX's competition here
EMN vs ASPI Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while ASPI trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASPI's competition here
EMN vs SIRE Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SIRE's competition here
EMN vs VHI Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while VHI trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check VHI's competition here
EMN vs CINR Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CINR's competition here
EMN vs FF Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while FF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FF's competition here
EMN vs FMST Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while FMST trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FMST's competition here
EMN vs FMSTW Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while FMSTW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FMSTW's competition here
EMN vs ORGN Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while ORGN trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ORGN's competition here
EMN vs ORGNW Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 58.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ORGNW's competition here
EMN vs OCIP Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check OCIP's competition here
EMN vs MKD Comparison June 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $71.95, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MKD's competition here