Eastman Chemical Company
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMN | $70.94 | -0.89% | 8.1B | 20.50 | $3.46 | +4.68% |
| DOW | $38.56 | -0.49% | 27.8B | -9.64 | -$4.00 | +4.54% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| LYB | $74.13 | -1.24% | 23.9B | -34.96 | -$2.12 | +6.47% |
| CE | $55.75 | -1.85% | 6.1B | -5.65 | -$9.86 | +0.21% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $62.09 | -2.04% | 4.8B | -85.05 | -$0.73 | +1.18% |
| HUN | $13.81 | +0.80% | 2.4B | -8.69 | -$1.59 | +4.88% |
| BAK | $5.02 | +2.55% | 2B | -1.10 | -$4.56 | N/A |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EMN vs DOW Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while DOW trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check DOW's competition here
EMN vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SHLM's competition here
EMN vs LYB Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while LYB trades at $74.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -34.96. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LYB's competition here
EMN vs CE Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while CE trades at $55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CE's competition here
EMN vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check UNVR's competition here
EMN vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while MEOH trades at $62.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -85.05. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MEOH's competition here
EMN vs HUN Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while HUN trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HUN's competition here
EMN vs BAK Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while BAK trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check BAK's competition here
EMN vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AACQU's competition here
EMN vs TROX Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while TROX trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TROX's competition here
EMN vs LXU Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while LXU trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LXU's competition here
EMN vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 797.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while WLKP trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WLKP's competition here
EMN vs RYAM Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while RYAM trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check RYAM's competition here
EMN vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 588.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while ASIX trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASIX's competition here
EMN vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SIRE's competition here
EMN vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while ASPI trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASPI's competition here
EMN vs CINR Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CINR's competition here
EMN vs VHI Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 369.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while VHI trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check VHI's competition here
EMN vs FF Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while FF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FF's competition here
EMN vs FMST Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while FMST trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FMST's competition here
EMN vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while ORGN trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ORGN's competition here
EMN vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while FMSTW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FMSTW's competition here
EMN vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 205.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ORGNW's competition here
EMN vs OCIP Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check OCIP's competition here
EMN vs MKD Comparison May 2026
EMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $70.94, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MKD's competition here