Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while LIN trades at $459.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LIN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SHW trades at $327.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SHW's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ECL trades at $273.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ECL's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while APD trades at $283.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check APD's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while PPG trades at $107.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PPG's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while IFF trades at $85.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IFF's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SQM trades at $70.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SQM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while LYB trades at $60.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LYB's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ALB trades at $113.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALB's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while RPM trades at $100.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check RPM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SOLS trades at $57.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SOLS's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while WLK trades at $69.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 96.77. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WLK's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ESI trades at $34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ESI's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while NEU trades at $883.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NEU's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOLSV has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SOLSV trades at $49.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SOLSV's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOLSV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SOLSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SOLSV's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while AXTA trades at $33.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AXTA's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALTM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IKNX's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SXT trades at $132.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SXT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while BCPC trades at $169.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check BCPC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while PRM trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PRM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CLMT trades at $57.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CLMT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CBT trades at $78.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CBT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while AVNT trades at $41.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AVNT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ASH trades at $70.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASH's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LTHM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while KWR trades at $160.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KWR's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while FUL trades at $51.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FUL's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while HWKN trades at $125.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HWKN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while WDFC trades at $193.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check WDFC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while NGVT trades at $70.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NGVT's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NGVT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while IOSP trades at $94.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check IOSP's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CC trades at $15.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while MTX trades at $67.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MTX's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, STDN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while STDN trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas STDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to STDN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check STDN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PQG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check PQG's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SCL trades at $63.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SCL's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ODC trades at $92.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ODC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CCF's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ECVT trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ECVT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 927.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while KRO trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KRO's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 876.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while KOP trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KOP's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 844.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while LWLG trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LWLG's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 671.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while MATV trades at $12.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MATV's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 570.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while RYAM trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check RYAM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 438.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ASIX trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASIX's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ASPN trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASPN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ASPI trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ASPI's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while GEVO trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GEVO's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 334.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while OEC trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -296.25. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check OEC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ALTO trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ALTO's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while FF trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FF's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while HDSN trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HDSN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CMT trades at $23.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CMT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while AMTX trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AMTX's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ACNT trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -60.75. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ACNT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while FEAM trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FEAM's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while NTIC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -263.00. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check NTIC's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while FSI trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FSI's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check VNTR's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while LOOP trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check LOOP's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while BON trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check BON's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ORGN trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ORGN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while TSE trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TSE's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SNES trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SNES's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SDSTW's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while YMAT trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check YMAT's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CNEY trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CNEY's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while SDST trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check SDST's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 19.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while CRKN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check CRKN's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 16.7K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check HGASW's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is not fully comparable compared to MOOV. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check MOOV's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check GCP's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check FOE's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while KMG trades at $76.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 543.86. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KMG's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ARG trades at $142.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ARG's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check KRA's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check ZY's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check AMRS's competition here

Eastman Chemical Company (NYSE: EMN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMN stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EMN is priced at $67.20 on the NYSE, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMN currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMN.Check TREC's competition here