RPM International Inc. (RPM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RPM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPM | $105.37 | +2.26% | 13.6B | 19.80 | $5.37 | +2.04% |
| LIN | $514.89 | +0.14% | 240.9B | 30.94 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $331.10 | -0.36% | 83.4B | 29.29 | $11.55 | +0.94% |
| ECL | $272.68 | +0.90% | 77.6B | 35.62 | $7.74 | +1.04% |
| APD | $296.03 | +0.80% | 66.2B | 23.14 | $12.84 | +2.43% |
| PPG | $117.29 | +1.71% | 26.5B | 15.44 | $7.69 | +2.40% |
| IFF | $78.08 | +3.67% | 19.8B | 18.26 | $4.25 | +2.07% |
| SQM | $69.38 | -2.99% | 19B | 23.26 | $2.86 | +1.54% |
| DD | $134.48 | -0.29% | 18.1B | 36.61 | $3.67 | +1.73% |
| ALB | $120.89 | -3.09% | 14.1B | 51.05 | $2.34 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
RPM vs LIN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 240.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while LIN trades at $514.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check LIN's competition here
RPM vs SHW Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SHW trades at $331.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SHW's competition here
RPM vs ECL Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ECL trades at $272.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ECL's competition here
RPM vs APD Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while APD trades at $296.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check APD's competition here
RPM vs PPG Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while PPG trades at $117.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check PPG's competition here
RPM vs IFF Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while IFF trades at $78.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check IFF's competition here
RPM vs SQM Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SQM trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SQM's competition here
RPM vs DD Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while DD trades at $134.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check DD's competition here
RPM vs ALB Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ALB trades at $120.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ALB's competition here
RPM vs WLK Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while WLK trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.06. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check WLK's competition here
RPM vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SOLS trades at $58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SOLS's competition here
RPM vs ESI Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ESI trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ESI's competition here
RPM vs NEU Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while NEU trades at $770.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check NEU's competition here
RPM vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while AXTA trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check AXTA's competition here
RPM vs SSL Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SSL trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SSL's competition here
RPM vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ALTM's competition here
RPM vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check IKNX's competition here
RPM vs PRM Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while PRM trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check PRM's competition here
RPM vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while BCPC trades at $163.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check BCPC's competition here
RPM vs CE Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CE trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CE's competition here
RPM vs SXT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SXT trades at $109.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SXT's competition here
RPM vs CBT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CBT trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CBT's competition here
RPM vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while AVNT trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check AVNT's competition here
RPM vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while WDFC trades at $248.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check WDFC's competition here
RPM vs ASH Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ASH trades at $68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ASH's competition here
RPM vs FUL Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while FUL trades at $56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check FUL's competition here
RPM vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while HWKN trades at $142.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check HWKN's competition here
RPM vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check LTHM's competition here
RPM vs KWR Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while KWR trades at $150.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check KWR's competition here
RPM vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while NGVT trades at $76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check NGVT's competition here
RPM vs CC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CC trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CC's competition here
RPM vs OLN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while OLN trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check OLN's competition here
RPM vs MTX Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while MTX trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check MTX's competition here
RPM vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while IOSP trades at $84.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check IOSP's competition here
RPM vs PQG Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check PQG's competition here
RPM vs REX Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while REX trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check REX's competition here
RPM vs ODC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ODC trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ODC's competition here
RPM vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ECVT trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ECVT's competition here
RPM vs SCL Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SCL trades at $58.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SCL's competition here
RPM vs CCF Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CCF's competition here
RPM vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while GPRE trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check GPRE's competition here
RPM vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 969.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while LWLG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check LWLG's competition here
RPM vs KOP Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 941.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while KOP trades at $48.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check KOP's competition here
RPM vs KRO Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 766.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while KRO trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check KRO's competition here
RPM vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ALTO trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ALTO's competition here
RPM vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while GEVO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check GEVO's competition here
RPM vs OEC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while OEC trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM and OEC have similar daily volatility (3.21).Check OEC's competition here
RPM vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while HDSN trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check HDSN's competition here
RPM vs CMT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CMT trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CMT's competition here
RPM vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ACNT trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ACNT's competition here
RPM vs FSI Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while FSI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 101.25. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check FSI's competition here
RPM vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while NTIC trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -271.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check NTIC's competition here
RPM vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while LOOP trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check LOOP's competition here
RPM vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check VNTR's competition here
RPM vs SDST Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SDST trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SDST's competition here
RPM vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while SDSTW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check SDSTW's competition here
RPM vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while YMAT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check YMAT's competition here
RPM vs GURE Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while GURE trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check GURE's competition here
RPM vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ORGN's competition here
RPM vs TSE Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check TSE's competition here
RPM vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CNEY trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CNEY's competition here
RPM vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check CRKN's competition here
RPM vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check HGASW's competition here
RPM vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RPM has daily volatility of 3.21 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
RPM vs ARG Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ARG's competition here
RPM vs ZY Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check ZY's competition here
RPM vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check AMRS's competition here
RPM vs KMG Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check KMG's competition here
RPM vs GCP Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check GCP's competition here
RPM vs TREC Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check TREC's competition here
RPM vs KRA Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check KRA's competition here
RPM vs FOE Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check FOE's competition here
RPM vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $105.37, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.Check AVTR-PA's competition here