Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. (RYAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RYAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYAM | $9.75 | +1.35% | 656.8M | -1.53 | -$6.37 | N/A |
| DOW | $38.10 | -1.45% | 27.4B | -9.52 | -$4.00 | +4.60% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $65.09 | +0.14% | 7.3B | -6.24 | -$10.44 | +0.18% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $60.76 | +1.90% | 4.7B | 65.32 | $0.93 | +1.22% |
| HUN | $13.72 | +0.73% | 2.4B | -8.63 | -$1.59 | +4.92% |
| TROX | $10.13 | +0.10% | 1.6B | -3.41 | -$2.97 | +2.71% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAK | $3.38 | -0.59% | 1.4B | -0.68 | -$4.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RYAM vs DOW Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while DOW trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check DOW's competition here
RYAM vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check SHLM's competition here
RYAM vs CE Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while CE trades at $65.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check CE's competition here
RYAM vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check UNVR's competition here
RYAM vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while MEOH trades at $60.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 65.32. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check MEOH's competition here
RYAM vs HUN Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while HUN trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check HUN's competition here
RYAM vs TROX Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while TROX trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check TROX's competition here
RYAM vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check AACQU's competition here
RYAM vs BAK Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while BAK trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check BAK's competition here
RYAM vs LXU Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while LXU trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check LXU's competition here
RYAM vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 793.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while WLKP trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check WLKP's competition here
RYAM vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 636.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while ASIX trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check ASIX's competition here
RYAM vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check SIRE's competition here
RYAM vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 470.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while ASPI trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check ASPI's competition here
RYAM vs VHI Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while VHI trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check VHI's competition here
RYAM vs CINR Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check CINR's competition here
RYAM vs FF Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while FF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check FF's competition here
RYAM vs FMST Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while FMST trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check FMST's competition here
RYAM vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while ORGN trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check ORGN's competition here
RYAM vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while FMSTW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check FMSTW's competition here
RYAM vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 308.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check ORGNW's competition here
RYAM vs OCIP Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check OCIP's competition here
RYAM vs MKD Comparison May 2026
RYAM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYAM stands at 656.8M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RYAM is priced at $9.75, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYAM currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RYAM's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RYAM is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYAM.Check MKD's competition here