PQ Group Holdings Inc. (PQG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PQG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PQG | $15.65 | +0.58% | 1.9B | -5.71 | -$2.74 | N/A |
| LIN | $512.15 | -0.72% | 236.9B | 33.96 | $15.08 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $320.79 | +2.23% | 79.1B | 30.82 | $10.41 | +0.99% |
| ECL | $269.12 | +0.02% | 75.7B | 36.42 | $7.39 | +1.06% |
| APD | $280.21 | -0.55% | 62.4B | 29.56 | $9.48 | +2.56% |
| PPG | $118.21 | +0.91% | 26.3B | 16.91 | $6.99 | +2.40% |
| SQM | $79.69 | -3.98% | 22.8B | 27.86 | $2.86 | +1.28% |
| IFF | $76.72 | +0.88% | 19.6B | 23.75 | $3.23 | +2.09% |
| DD | $47.69 | -0.54% | 19.5B | 125.50 | $0.38 | +1.62% |
| ALB | $160.35 | -3.73% | 18.9B | -46.89 | -$3.42 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
PQG vs LIN Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 236.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while LIN trades at $512.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check LIN's competition here
PQG vs SHW Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SHW trades at $320.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SHW's competition here
PQG vs ECL Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ECL trades at $269.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ECL's competition here
PQG vs APD Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while APD trades at $280.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check APD's competition here
PQG vs PPG Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while PPG trades at $118.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check PPG's competition here
PQG vs SQM Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SQM trades at $79.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SQM's competition here
PQG vs IFF Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while IFF trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check IFF's competition here
PQG vs DD Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while DD trades at $47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check DD's competition here
PQG vs ALB Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ALB trades at $160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -46.89. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ALB's competition here
PQG vs RPM Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while RPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check RPM's competition here
PQG vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SOLS trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 71.91. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SOLS's competition here
PQG vs ESI Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ESI trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 74.15. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ESI's competition here
PQG vs WLK Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while WLK trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check WLK's competition here
PQG vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while AXTA trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check AXTA's competition here
PQG vs NEU Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while NEU trades at $780.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check NEU's competition here
PQG vs SSL Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SSL trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SSL's competition here
PQG vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ALTM's competition here
PQG vs PRM Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while PRM trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check PRM's competition here
PQG vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check IKNX's competition here
PQG vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while BCPC trades at $165.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check BCPC's competition here
PQG vs SXT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SXT trades at $113.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SXT's competition here
PQG vs CBT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CBT trades at $91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CBT's competition here
PQG vs FUL Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while FUL trades at $64.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check FUL's competition here
PQG vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while AVNT trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check AVNT's competition here
PQG vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while HWKN trades at $161.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check HWKN's competition here
PQG vs CC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CC trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CC's competition here
PQG vs ASH Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ASH trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ASH's competition here
PQG vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while WDFC trades at $227.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check WDFC's competition here
PQG vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check LTHM's competition here
PQG vs KWR Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while KWR trades at $150.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 600.72. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check KWR's competition here
PQG vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while NGVT trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check NGVT's competition here
PQG vs OLN Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while OLN trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check OLN's competition here
PQG vs MTX Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while MTX trades at $78.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check MTX's competition here
PQG vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while IOSP trades at $82.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check IOSP's competition here
PQG vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while LWLG trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -65.20. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check LWLG's competition here
PQG vs REX Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while REX trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check REX's competition here
PQG vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ECVT trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.41. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ECVT's competition here
PQG vs ODC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ODC trades at $95.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ODC's competition here
PQG vs SCL Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SCL trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SCL's competition here
PQG vs CCF Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CCF's competition here
PQG vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while GPRE trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -82.33. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check GPRE's competition here
PQG vs KOP Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 841M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while KOP trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check KOP's competition here
PQG vs KRO Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while KRO trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check KRO's competition here
PQG vs OEC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 419.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while OEC trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check OEC's competition here
PQG vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ALTO trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ALTO's competition here
PQG vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while GEVO trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check GEVO's competition here
PQG vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while HDSN trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check HDSN's competition here
PQG vs CMT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CMT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CMT's competition here
PQG vs FSI Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while FSI trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 108.00. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check FSI's competition here
PQG vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while NTIC trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -89.33. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check NTIC's competition here
PQG vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while LOOP trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check LOOP's competition here
PQG vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check VNTR's competition here
PQG vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while YMAT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check YMAT's competition here
PQG vs SNES Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while SNES trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check SNES's competition here
PQG vs GURE Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while GURE trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check GURE's competition here
PQG vs TSE Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check TSE's competition here
PQG vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CNEY trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CNEY's competition here
PQG vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check CRKN's competition here
PQG vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check HGASW's competition here
PQG vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PQG has daily volatility of 3.34 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
PQG vs TREC Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check TREC's competition here
PQG vs ARG Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ARG's competition here
PQG vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check AMRS's competition here
PQG vs ZY Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check ZY's competition here
PQG vs GCP Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check GCP's competition here
PQG vs FOE Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check FOE's competition here
PQG vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
PQG vs KMG Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check KMG's competition here
PQG vs KRA Comparison June 2026
PQG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PQG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PQG is priced at $15.65, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PQG currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, PQG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PQG is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PQG.Check KRA's competition here