FutureFuel Corp. (FF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | $4.80 | +3.90% | 210.1M | -4.03 | -$1.19 | +3.99% |
| LIN | $513.22 | -1.44% | 237.3B | 30.49 | $16.83 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $331.32 | -2.02% | 81.7B | 28.68 | $11.55 | +0.96% |
| ECL | $272.83 | -1.04% | 76.8B | 35.25 | $7.74 | +1.04% |
| APD | $295.62 | -0.56% | 65.8B | 23.01 | $12.84 | +2.43% |
| PPG | $117.36 | -1.11% | 26.2B | 15.26 | $7.69 | +2.42% |
| IFF | $78.20 | +0.77% | 20B | 18.40 | $4.25 | +2.06% |
| SQM | $69.81 | +5.25% | 19.9B | 24.46 | $2.86 | +1.47% |
| LYB | $59.17 | +2.37% | 19.1B | 31.82 | $1.86 | +6.97% |
| DD | $135.29 | +0.74% | 18.3B | 36.87 | $3.67 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
FF vs LIN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while LIN trades at $513.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LIN's competition here
FF vs SHW Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SHW trades at $331.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SHW's competition here
FF vs ECL Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ECL trades at $272.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ECL's competition here
FF vs APD Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while APD trades at $295.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check APD's competition here
FF vs PPG Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while PPG trades at $117.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check PPG's competition here
FF vs IFF Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while IFF trades at $78.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check IFF's competition here
FF vs SQM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SQM trades at $69.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SQM's competition here
FF vs LYB Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while LYB trades at $59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LYB's competition here
FF vs DD Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while DD trades at $135.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check DD's competition here
FF vs ALB Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ALB trades at $120.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 51.60. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ALB's competition here
FF vs RPM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while RPM trades at $105.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check RPM's competition here
FF vs WLK Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while WLK trades at $77.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.46. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check WLK's competition here
FF vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SOLS trades at $58.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SOLS's competition here
FF vs ESI Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ESI trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ESI's competition here
FF vs EMN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while EMN trades at $68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check EMN's competition here
FF vs SSL Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SSL trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SSL's competition here
FF vs NEU Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while NEU trades at $770.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check NEU's competition here
FF vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while AXTA trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AXTA's competition here
FF vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ALTM's competition here
FF vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check IKNX's competition here
FF vs PRM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while PRM trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check PRM's competition here
FF vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while BCPC trades at $163.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check BCPC's competition here
FF vs CE Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CE trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CE's competition here
FF vs CBT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CBT trades at $90.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CBT's competition here
FF vs SXT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SXT trades at $109.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SXT's competition here
FF vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while AVNT trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AVNT's competition here
FF vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while WDFC trades at $246.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check WDFC's competition here
FF vs ASH Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ASH trades at $68.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASH's competition here
FF vs FUL Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while FUL trades at $56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FUL's competition here
FF vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while HWKN trades at $144.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HWKN's competition here
FF vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LTHM's competition here
FF vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while NGVT trades at $76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check NGVT's competition here
FF vs CC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CC trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CC's competition here
FF vs KWR Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while KWR trades at $150.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check KWR's competition here
FF vs OLN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while OLN trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check OLN's competition here
FF vs MTX Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while MTX trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MTX's competition here
FF vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while IOSP trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check IOSP's competition here
FF vs PQG Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check PQG's competition here
FF vs REX Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while REX trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check REX's competition here
FF vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ECVT trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ECVT's competition here
FF vs ODC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ODC trades at $97.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ODC's competition here
FF vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while GPRE trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check GPRE's competition here
FF vs SCL Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SCL trades at $58.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SCL's competition here
FF vs CCF Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CCF's competition here
FF vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 959.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while LWLG trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -36.65. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LWLG's competition here
FF vs KOP Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 945.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while KOP trades at $49.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check KOP's competition here
FF vs KRO Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 756.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while KRO trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check KRO's competition here
FF vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 452.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ALTO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ALTO's competition here
FF vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 396.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while GEVO trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check GEVO's competition here
FF vs OEC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while OEC trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 42.75. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check OEC's competition here
FF vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while HDSN trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HDSN's competition here
FF vs CMT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CMT trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CMT's competition here
FF vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ACNT trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -39.21. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ACNT's competition here
FF vs AMTX Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while AMTX trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AMTX's competition here
FF vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while NTIC trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -269.67. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check NTIC's competition here
FF vs FSI Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while FSI trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FSI's competition here
FF vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while LOOP trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LOOP's competition here
FF vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check VNTR's competition here
FF vs FEAM Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while FEAM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FEAM's competition here
FF vs SDST Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SDST trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SDST's competition here
FF vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while SDSTW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SDSTW's competition here
FF vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while YMAT trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check YMAT's competition here
FF vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGN's competition here
FF vs GURE Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while GURE trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check GURE's competition here
FF vs TSE Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check TSE's competition here
FF vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CNEY trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CNEY's competition here
FF vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CRKN's competition here
FF vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HGASW's competition here
FF vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FF has daily volatility of 5.32 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
FF vs FOE Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FOE's competition here
FF vs KRA Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check KRA's competition here
FF vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AMRS's competition here
FF vs TREC Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check TREC's competition here
FF vs GCP Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check GCP's competition here
FF vs KMG Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 543.86. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check KMG's competition here
FF vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
FF vs ZY Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ZY's competition here
FF vs ARG Comparison July 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 210.1M. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.80, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.03, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ARG's competition here