FutureFuel Corp.
FutureFuel Corp. (FF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | $4.08 | +0.00% | 175.9M | -3.37 | -$1.19 | +5.90% |
| DOW | $36.33 | -3.74% | 26.1B | -9.06 | -$4.00 | +4.84% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| LYB | $71.14 | -2.61% | 23B | -33.64 | -$2.12 | +6.69% |
| EMN | $71.61 | +5.08% | 8.1B | 20.41 | $3.46 | +4.76% |
| CE | $52.35 | -2.13% | 5.9B | -5.42 | -$9.86 | +0.22% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $61.55 | -0.84% | 4.7B | -82.93 | -$0.73 | +1.22% |
| HUN | $14.15 | +6.19% | 2.5B | -8.84 | -$1.59 | +4.82% |
| BAK | $4.83 | -0.62% | 1.9B | -1.06 | -$4.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FF vs DOW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while DOW trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check DOW's competition here
FF vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SHLM's competition here
FF vs LYB Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while LYB trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LYB's competition here
FF vs EMN Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while EMN trades at $71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check EMN's competition here
FF vs CE Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while CE trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CE's competition here
FF vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check UNVR's competition here
FF vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while MEOH trades at $61.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -82.93. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MEOH's competition here
FF vs HUN Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while HUN trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HUN's competition here
FF vs BAK Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while BAK trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check BAK's competition here
FF vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AACQU's competition here
FF vs TROX Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while TROX trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check TROX's competition here
FF vs LXU Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 960.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while LXU trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LXU's competition here
FF vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 788.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while WLKP trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check WLKP's competition here
FF vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 577.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while ASIX trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASIX's competition here
FF vs RYAM Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 573.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while RYAM trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check RYAM's competition here
FF vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SIRE's competition here
FF vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 437.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while ASPI trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASPI's competition here
FF vs CINR Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CINR's competition here
FF vs VHI Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while VHI trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check VHI's competition here
FF vs FMST Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while FMST trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMST's competition here
FF vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while FMSTW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMSTW's competition here
FF vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while ORGN trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGN's competition here
FF vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 102.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGNW's competition here
FF vs OCIP Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check OCIP's competition here
FF vs MKD Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 175.9M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.08, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MKD's competition here