FutureFuel Corp. (FF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | $4.24 | +0.24% | 186M | -3.56 | -$1.19 | +4.48% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| DOW | $31.73 | -2.37% | 22.9B | -7.93 | -$4.00 | +4.41% |
| LYB | $60.07 | -2.82% | 19.4B | -28.33 | -$2.12 | +6.86% |
| EMN | $72.49 | +0.51% | 8.3B | 20.95 | $3.46 | +4.62% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CE | $51.16 | -0.14% | 5.6B | -5.19 | -$9.86 | +0.23% |
| MEOH | $53.18 | -3.61% | 4.1B | -72.85 | -$0.73 | +1.39% |
| HUN | $12.07 | -5.18% | 2.1B | -6.42 | -$1.88 | +4.25% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FF vs SHLM Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SHLM's competition here
FF vs DOW Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while DOW trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check DOW's competition here
FF vs LYB Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while LYB trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LYB's competition here
FF vs EMN Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while EMN trades at $72.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check EMN's competition here
FF vs UNVR Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check UNVR's competition here
FF vs CE Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while CE trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CE's competition here
FF vs MEOH Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while MEOH trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is -72.85. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MEOH's competition here
FF vs HUN Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while HUN trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HUN's competition here
FF vs AACQU Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AACQU's competition here
FF vs TROX Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while TROX trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check TROX's competition here
FF vs BAK Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while BAK trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check BAK's competition here
FF vs LXU Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 818.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while LXU trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LXU's competition here
FF vs WLKP Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 796.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while WLKP trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check WLKP's competition here
FF vs RYAM Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 610.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while RYAM trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check RYAM's competition here
FF vs ASPI Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 596.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while ASPI trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASPI's competition here
FF vs ASIX Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while ASIX trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 55.17. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASIX's competition here
FF vs SIRE Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SIRE's competition here
FF vs CINR Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CINR's competition here
FF vs VHI Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while VHI trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check VHI's competition here
FF vs FMST Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while FMST trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMST's competition here
FF vs FMSTW Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while FMSTW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMSTW's competition here
FF vs ORGN Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while ORGN trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGN's competition here
FF vs ORGNW Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGNW's competition here
FF vs MKD Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MKD's competition here
FF vs OCIP Comparison June 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 186M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.24, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.56, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check OCIP's competition here