FutureFuel Corp.
FutureFuel Corp. (FF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | $4.81 | +13.71% | 198M | -4.00 | -$1.13 | +5.44% |
| DOW | $40.04 | +5.34% | 28.5B | -9.88 | -$4.00 | +4.42% |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| CE | $67.62 | +4.59% | 7.3B | -6.23 | -$10.44 | +0.18% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| MEOH | $64.38 | +6.59% | 4.9B | 68.08 | $0.93 | +1.17% |
| HUN | $14.19 | +3.84% | 2.3B | -8.32 | -$1.59 | +5.11% |
| AACQU | $11.05 | +4.74% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TROX | $10.00 | +2.15% | 1.5B | -3.25 | -$2.97 | +2.81% |
| BAK | $3.75 | +9.01% | 1.4B | -0.72 | -$4.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FF vs DOW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while DOW trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check DOW's competition here
FF vs SHLM Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SHLM's competition here
FF vs CE Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while CE trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CE's competition here
FF vs UNVR Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check UNVR's competition here
FF vs MEOH Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while MEOH trades at $64.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 68.08. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MEOH's competition here
FF vs HUN Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while HUN trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check HUN's competition here
FF vs AACQU Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while AACQU trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check AACQU's competition here
FF vs TROX Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while TROX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check TROX's competition here
FF vs BAK Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while BAK trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check BAK's competition here
FF vs LXU Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while LXU trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check LXU's competition here
FF vs WLKP Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while WLKP trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check WLKP's competition here
FF vs ASIX Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 657M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while ASIX trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASIX's competition here
FF vs RYAM Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 632.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while RYAM trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check RYAM's competition here
FF vs SIRE Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check SIRE's competition here
FF vs VHI Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 420.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while VHI trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check VHI's competition here
FF vs ASPI Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while ASPI trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ASPI's competition here
FF vs CINR Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check CINR's competition here
FF vs FMST Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while FMST trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMST's competition here
FF vs ORGN Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while ORGN trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGN's competition here
FF vs FMSTW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while FMSTW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check FMSTW's competition here
FF vs ORGNW Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 220.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check ORGNW's competition here
FF vs MKD Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check MKD's competition here
FF vs OCIP Comparison May 2026
FF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FF stands at 198M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FF is priced at $4.81, while OCIP trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FF's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FF is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FF.Check OCIP's competition here