Linde plc (LIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $525.83 | -0.75% | 242.4B | 31.14 | $16.83 | +1.18% |
| SHW | $329.08 | -1.47% | 81.1B | 28.49 | $11.55 | +0.97% |
| ECL | $270.87 | -1.25% | 76.5B | 35.13 | $7.74 | +1.05% |
| APD | $303.70 | +1.39% | 67.3B | 23.53 | $12.84 | +2.38% |
| PPG | $114.10 | -2.28% | 25.4B | 14.80 | $7.69 | +2.50% |
| SQM | $72.93 | -0.36% | 20.6B | 25.20 | $2.86 | +1.40% |
| IFF | $75.70 | -2.36% | 19.2B | 17.67 | $4.25 | +2.13% |
| DD | $133.89 | -0.59% | 17.9B | 36.16 | $3.67 | +1.75% |
| ALB | $128.69 | +2.09% | 14.8B | 53.76 | $2.34 | +1.29% |
| RPM | $102.32 | -2.65% | 13.1B | 19.10 | $5.37 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SHW trades at $329.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SHW's competition here
LIN vs ECL Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ECL trades at $270.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECL's competition here
LIN vs APD Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while APD trades at $303.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check APD's competition here
LIN vs PPG Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while PPG trades at $114.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PPG's competition here
LIN vs SQM Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SQM trades at $72.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SQM's competition here
LIN vs IFF Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while IFF trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IFF's competition here
LIN vs DD Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while DD trades at $133.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DD's competition here
LIN vs ALB Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ALB trades at $128.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALB's competition here
LIN vs RPM Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while RPM trades at $102.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check RPM's competition here
LIN vs WLK Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while WLK trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WLK's competition here
LIN vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SOLS trades at $62.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SOLS's competition here
LIN vs ESI Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ESI trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ESI's competition here
LIN vs SSL Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SSL trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SSL's competition here
LIN vs NEU Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while NEU trades at $759.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NEU's competition here
LIN vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while AXTA trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AXTA's competition here
LIN vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTM's competition here
LIN vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IKNX's competition here
LIN vs PRM Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while PRM trades at $33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PRM's competition here
LIN vs CE Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CE trades at $47.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CE's competition here
LIN vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while BCPC trades at $160.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check BCPC's competition here
LIN vs SXT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SXT trades at $114.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SXT's competition here
LIN vs CBT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CBT trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CBT's competition here
LIN vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while WDFC trades at $247.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WDFC's competition here
LIN vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while AVNT trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVNT's competition here
LIN vs ASH Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ASH trades at $66.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ASH's competition here
LIN vs FUL Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while FUL trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FUL's competition here
LIN vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LTHM's competition here
LIN vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while HWKN trades at $136.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HWKN's competition here
LIN vs CC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CC's competition here
LIN vs KWR Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while KWR trades at $149.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KWR's competition here
LIN vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while NGVT trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NGVT's competition here
LIN vs OLN Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while OLN trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -27.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OLN's competition here
LIN vs MTX Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while MTX trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check MTX's competition here
LIN vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while IOSP trades at $81.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IOSP's competition here
LIN vs PQG Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PQG's competition here
LIN vs REX Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while REX trades at $47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check REX's competition here
LIN vs ODC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ODC trades at $103.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ODC's competition here
LIN vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ECVT trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECVT's competition here
LIN vs SCL Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SCL trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SCL's competition here
LIN vs CCF Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CCF's competition here
LIN vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while GPRE trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GPRE's competition here
LIN vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 996.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while LWLG trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -38.06. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LWLG's competition here
LIN vs KOP Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 919.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while KOP trades at $48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KOP's competition here
LIN vs KRO Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 743.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while KRO trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRO's competition here
LIN vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 454.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ALTO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTO's competition here
LIN vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while GEVO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GEVO's competition here
LIN vs OEC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while OEC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OEC's competition here
LIN vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while HDSN trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HDSN's competition here
LIN vs CMT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CMT trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CMT's competition here
LIN vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ACNT trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ACNT's competition here
LIN vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while NTIC trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NTIC's competition here
LIN vs FSI Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while FSI trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 95.85. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FSI's competition here
LIN vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while LOOP trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LOOP's competition here
LIN vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check VNTR's competition here
LIN vs SDST Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SDST trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SDST's competition here
LIN vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SDSTW's competition here
LIN vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while YMAT trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check YMAT's competition here
LIN vs GURE Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while GURE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GURE's competition here
LIN vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ORGN's competition here
LIN vs TSE Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TSE's competition here
LIN vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CNEY trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CNEY's competition here
LIN vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CRKN's competition here
LIN vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGASW's competition here
LIN vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.38 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LIN vs ZY Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ZY's competition here
LIN vs KMG Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KMG's competition here
LIN vs KRA Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRA's competition here
LIN vs ARG Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ARG's competition here
LIN vs TREC Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TREC's competition here
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LIN vs FOE Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FOE's competition here
LIN vs GCP Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GCP's competition here
LIN vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 242.4B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $525.83, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 31.14, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AMRS's competition here