Linde plc (LIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $512.15 | -0.72% | 236.9B | 33.96 | $15.08 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $320.79 | +2.23% | 79.1B | 30.82 | $10.41 | +0.99% |
| ECL | $269.12 | +0.02% | 75.7B | 36.42 | $7.39 | +1.06% |
| APD | $280.21 | -0.55% | 62.4B | 29.56 | $9.48 | +2.56% |
| PPG | $118.21 | +0.91% | 26.3B | 16.91 | $6.99 | +2.40% |
| SQM | $79.69 | -3.98% | 22.8B | 27.86 | $2.86 | +1.28% |
| IFF | $76.72 | +0.88% | 19.6B | 23.75 | $3.23 | +2.09% |
| DD | $47.69 | -0.54% | 19.5B | 125.50 | $0.38 | +1.62% |
| ALB | $160.35 | -3.73% | 18.9B | -46.89 | -$3.42 | +1.01% |
| RPM | $108.00 | +0.92% | 13.8B | 20.81 | $5.19 | +1.97% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SHW trades at $320.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SHW's competition here
LIN vs ECL Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ECL trades at $269.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECL's competition here
LIN vs APD Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while APD trades at $280.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check APD's competition here
LIN vs PPG Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while PPG trades at $118.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PPG's competition here
LIN vs SQM Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SQM trades at $79.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SQM's competition here
LIN vs IFF Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while IFF trades at $76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IFF's competition here
LIN vs DD Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while DD trades at $47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DD's competition here
LIN vs ALB Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ALB trades at $160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -46.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALB's competition here
LIN vs RPM Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while RPM trades at $108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check RPM's competition here
LIN vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SOLS trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 71.91. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SOLS's competition here
LIN vs ESI Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ESI trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 74.15. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ESI's competition here
LIN vs WLK Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while WLK trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WLK's competition here
LIN vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while AXTA trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AXTA's competition here
LIN vs NEU Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while NEU trades at $780.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NEU's competition here
LIN vs SSL Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SSL trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 46.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SSL's competition here
LIN vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTM's competition here
LIN vs PRM Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while PRM trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PRM's competition here
LIN vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IKNX's competition here
LIN vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while BCPC trades at $165.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check BCPC's competition here
LIN vs SXT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SXT trades at $113.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SXT's competition here
LIN vs CBT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CBT trades at $91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CBT's competition here
LIN vs FUL Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while FUL trades at $64.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FUL's competition here
LIN vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while AVNT trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVNT's competition here
LIN vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while HWKN trades at $161.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HWKN's competition here
LIN vs CC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CC trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CC's competition here
LIN vs ASH Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ASH trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ASH's competition here
LIN vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while WDFC trades at $227.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WDFC's competition here
LIN vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LTHM's competition here
LIN vs KWR Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while KWR trades at $150.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 600.72. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KWR's competition here
LIN vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while NGVT trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NGVT's competition here
LIN vs OLN Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while OLN trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OLN's competition here
LIN vs MTX Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while MTX trades at $78.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check MTX's competition here
LIN vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while IOSP trades at $82.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IOSP's competition here
LIN vs PQG Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PQG's competition here
LIN vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while LWLG trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -65.20. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LWLG's competition here
LIN vs REX Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while REX trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check REX's competition here
LIN vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ECVT trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.41. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECVT's competition here
LIN vs ODC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ODC trades at $95.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ODC's competition here
LIN vs SCL Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SCL trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SCL's competition here
LIN vs CCF Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CCF's competition here
LIN vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while GPRE trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -82.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GPRE's competition here
LIN vs KOP Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 841M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while KOP trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KOP's competition here
LIN vs KRO Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 787M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while KRO trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRO's competition here
LIN vs OEC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 419.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while OEC trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OEC's competition here
LIN vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ALTO trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTO's competition here
LIN vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while GEVO trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GEVO's competition here
LIN vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while HDSN trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HDSN's competition here
LIN vs CMT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CMT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CMT's competition here
LIN vs FSI Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while FSI trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 108.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FSI's competition here
LIN vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while NTIC trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -89.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NTIC's competition here
LIN vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while LOOP trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LOOP's competition here
LIN vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check VNTR's competition here
LIN vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while YMAT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check YMAT's competition here
LIN vs SNES Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while SNES trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SNES's competition here
LIN vs GURE Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while GURE trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GURE's competition here
LIN vs TSE Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TSE's competition here
LIN vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CNEY trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CNEY's competition here
LIN vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CRKN's competition here
LIN vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGASW's competition here
LIN vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.47 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LIN vs FOE Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FOE's competition here
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LIN vs KRA Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRA's competition here
LIN vs TREC Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TREC's competition here
LIN vs KMG Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KMG's competition here
LIN vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AMRS's competition here
LIN vs ARG Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ARG's competition here
LIN vs ZY Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ZY's competition here
LIN vs GCP Comparison June 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 236.9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $512.15, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.96, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GCP's competition here