The Chemours Company (CC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | $21.46 | -1.42% | 3.2B | -7.86 | -$2.73 | +1.67% |
| LIN | $516.71 | +0.89% | 239B | 34.31 | $15.06 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $316.90 | -1.21% | 78.2B | 30.39 | $10.43 | +0.99% |
| ECL | $269.34 | +0.08% | 75.8B | 36.40 | $7.40 | +1.05% |
| APD | $283.11 | +1.03% | 63B | 29.80 | $9.50 | +2.53% |
| PPG | $118.92 | +0.57% | 26.5B | 17.04 | $6.98 | +2.38% |
| SQM | $78.65 | -1.31% | 22.5B | 27.49 | $2.86 | +1.30% |
| DD | $48.19 | +1.01% | 19.7B | 126.74 | $0.38 | +1.61% |
| IFF | $75.95 | -1.00% | 19.4B | 23.52 | $3.23 | +2.09% |
| ALB | $156.69 | -2.28% | 18.5B | -45.79 | -$3.42 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
CC vs LIN Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 239B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while LIN trades at $516.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LIN's competition here
CC vs SHW Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SHW trades at $316.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SHW's competition here
CC vs ECL Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ECL trades at $269.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECL's competition here
CC vs APD Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while APD trades at $283.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check APD's competition here
CC vs PPG Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while PPG trades at $118.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PPG's competition here
CC vs SQM Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SQM trades at $78.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SQM's competition here
CC vs DD Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while DD trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 126.74. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check DD's competition here
CC vs IFF Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while IFF trades at $75.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IFF's competition here
CC vs ALB Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ALB trades at $156.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -45.79. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALB's competition here
CC vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SOLS trades at $86.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SOLS's competition here
CC vs RPM Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while RPM trades at $107.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check RPM's competition here
CC vs ESI Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ESI trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 79.22. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ESI's competition here
CC vs WLK Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while WLK trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WLK's competition here
CC vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while AXTA trades at $34.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AXTA's competition here
CC vs SSL Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SSL trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SSL's competition here
CC vs NEU Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while NEU trades at $780.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NEU's competition here
CC vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTM's competition here
CC vs PRM Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while PRM trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PRM's competition here
CC vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IKNX's competition here
CC vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while BCPC trades at $165.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check BCPC's competition here
CC vs SXT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SXT trades at $119.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SXT's competition here
CC vs CBT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while CBT trades at $90.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CBT's competition here
CC vs FUL Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while FUL trades at $64.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FUL's competition here
CC vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while AVNT trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVNT's competition here
CC vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while HWKN trades at $162.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HWKN's competition here
CC vs ASH Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ASH trades at $67.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ASH's competition here
CC vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while WDFC trades at $223.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WDFC's competition here
CC vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LTHM's competition here
CC vs KWR Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while KWR trades at $150.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 579.38. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KWR's competition here
CC vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while NGVT trades at $72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NGVT's competition here
CC vs OLN Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while OLN trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OLN's competition here
CC vs MTX Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while MTX trades at $77.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check MTX's competition here
CC vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while IOSP trades at $82.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IOSP's competition here
CC vs PQG Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PQG's competition here
CC vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while LWLG trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -62.69. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LWLG's competition here
CC vs REX Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while REX trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check REX's competition here
CC vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ECVT trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.74. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECVT's competition here
CC vs ODC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ODC trades at $94.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ODC's competition here
CC vs SCL Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SCL trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -86.29. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SCL's competition here
CC vs CCF Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CCF's competition here
CC vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while GPRE trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -83.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GPRE's competition here
CC vs KOP Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while KOP trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KOP's competition here
CC vs KRO Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while KRO trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRO's competition here
CC vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ALTO trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTO's competition here
CC vs OEC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 403.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while OEC trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OEC's competition here
CC vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while GEVO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GEVO's competition here
CC vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while HDSN trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HDSN's competition here
CC vs CMT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while CMT trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CMT's competition here
CC vs FSI Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while FSI trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 107.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FSI's competition here
CC vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while NTIC trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -91.22. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NTIC's competition here
CC vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while LOOP trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LOOP's competition here
CC vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check VNTR's competition here
CC vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while YMAT trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check YMAT's competition here
CC vs SNES Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while SNES trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SNES's competition here
CC vs GURE Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while GURE trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GURE's competition here
CC vs TSE Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TSE's competition here
CC vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while CNEY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CNEY's competition here
CC vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 277.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while CRKN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CRKN's competition here
CC vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HGASW's competition here
CC vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CC has daily volatility of 3.79 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
CC vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AMRS's competition here
CC vs KRA Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRA's competition here
CC vs ARG Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ARG's competition here
CC vs TREC Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TREC's competition here
CC vs ZY Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ZY's competition here
CC vs GCP Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GCP's competition here
CC vs FOE Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FOE's competition here
CC vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
CC vs KMG Comparison June 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.46, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -7.86, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KMG's competition here