The Chemours Company (CC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | $18.24 | -2.09% | 2.8B | 21.04 | $0.88 | +1.90% |
| LIN | $512.58 | -1.91% | 237.8B | 30.55 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $336.59 | +2.46% | 82B | 28.78 | $11.55 | +0.96% |
| ECL | $273.51 | +1.39% | 76.1B | 34.92 | $7.74 | +1.05% |
| APD | $291.50 | -2.64% | 65.4B | 22.89 | $12.84 | +2.45% |
| PPG | $117.93 | +2.85% | 25.7B | 14.99 | $7.69 | +2.45% |
| SQM | $69.62 | -4.57% | 20.4B | 25.07 | $2.86 | +1.42% |
| IFF | $76.44 | +2.37% | 19.2B | 17.72 | $4.25 | +2.12% |
| DD | $134.48 | +0.23% | 18.2B | 36.76 | $3.67 | +1.72% |
| ALB | $121.37 | -5.73% | 14.7B | 53.32 | $2.34 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
CC vs LIN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 237.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while LIN trades at $512.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LIN's competition here
CC vs SHW Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SHW trades at $336.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SHW's competition here
CC vs ECL Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ECL trades at $273.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECL's competition here
CC vs APD Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while APD trades at $291.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check APD's competition here
CC vs PPG Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while PPG trades at $117.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PPG's competition here
CC vs SQM Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SQM trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SQM's competition here
CC vs IFF Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while IFF trades at $76.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IFF's competition here
CC vs DD Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while DD trades at $134.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.76. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check DD's competition here
CC vs ALB Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ALB trades at $121.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALB's competition here
CC vs RPM Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while RPM trades at $105.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check RPM's competition here
CC vs WLK Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while WLK trades at $77.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.02. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WLK's competition here
CC vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SOLS trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SOLS's competition here
CC vs ESI Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ESI trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ESI's competition here
CC vs SSL Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SSL trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SSL's competition here
CC vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while AXTA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AXTA's competition here
CC vs NEU Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while NEU trades at $757.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NEU's competition here
CC vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTM's competition here
CC vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IKNX's competition here
CC vs PRM Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while PRM trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PRM's competition here
CC vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while BCPC trades at $165.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check BCPC's competition here
CC vs CE Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CE trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CE's competition here
CC vs SXT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SXT trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SXT's competition here
CC vs CBT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CBT trades at $90.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CBT's competition here
CC vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while WDFC trades at $252.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WDFC's competition here
CC vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while AVNT trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVNT's competition here
CC vs ASH Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ASH trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ASH's competition here
CC vs FUL Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while FUL trades at $57.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FUL's competition here
CC vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while HWKN trades at $142.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HWKN's competition here
CC vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LTHM's competition here
CC vs KWR Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while KWR trades at $155.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KWR's competition here
CC vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while NGVT trades at $75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NGVT's competition here
CC vs OLN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while OLN trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OLN's competition here
CC vs MTX Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while MTX trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check MTX's competition here
CC vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while IOSP trades at $84.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IOSP's competition here
CC vs PQG Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PQG's competition here
CC vs REX Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while REX trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check REX's competition here
CC vs ODC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ODC trades at $103.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ODC's competition here
CC vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ECVT trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECVT's competition here
CC vs SCL Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SCL trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SCL's competition here
CC vs CCF Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CCF's competition here
CC vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while GPRE trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GPRE's competition here
CC vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while LWLG trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -39.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LWLG's competition here
CC vs KOP Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while KOP trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KOP's competition here
CC vs KRO Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 772M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while KRO trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRO's competition here
CC vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ALTO trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTO's competition here
CC vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while GEVO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GEVO's competition here
CC vs OEC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while OEC trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OEC's competition here
CC vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while HDSN trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HDSN's competition here
CC vs CMT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CMT trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CMT's competition here
CC vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ACNT trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ACNT's competition here
CC vs FSI Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while FSI trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 103.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FSI's competition here
CC vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while NTIC trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -273.33. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NTIC's competition here
CC vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while LOOP trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LOOP's competition here
CC vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check VNTR's competition here
CC vs SDST Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SDST trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SDST's competition here
CC vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SDSTW's competition here
CC vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while YMAT trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check YMAT's competition here
CC vs GURE Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while GURE trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GURE's competition here
CC vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ORGN's competition here
CC vs TSE Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TSE's competition here
CC vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CNEY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CNEY's competition here
CC vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CRKN's competition here
CC vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HGASW's competition here
CC vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CC has daily volatility of 2.53 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
CC vs ARG Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ARG's competition here
CC vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AMRS's competition here
CC vs ZY Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ZY's competition here
CC vs KMG Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KMG's competition here
CC vs GCP Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GCP's competition here
CC vs TREC Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TREC's competition here
CC vs KRA Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRA's competition here
CC vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
CC vs FOE Comparison July 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $18.24, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.04, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.64%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FOE's competition here