Amyris, Inc. (AMRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRS | $0.05 | +0.00% | 0 | -0.04 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| LIN | $529.79 | +0.40% | 243.1B | 31.23 | $16.83 | +1.17% |
| SHW | $333.99 | +0.59% | 82.4B | 28.92 | $11.55 | +0.95% |
| ECL | $274.31 | +0.47% | 77.2B | 35.44 | $7.74 | +1.03% |
| APD | $299.53 | +1.24% | 66.7B | 23.32 | $12.84 | +2.40% |
| PPG | $116.76 | +0.69% | 26B | 15.18 | $7.69 | +2.41% |
| SQM | $73.19 | -1.21% | 20.9B | 25.64 | $2.86 | +1.39% |
| IFF | $77.53 | -1.27% | 19.8B | 18.24 | $4.25 | +2.06% |
| DD | $134.68 | -0.08% | 18.2B | 36.71 | $3.67 | +1.71% |
| ALB | $126.05 | -1.85% | 14.9B | 53.86 | $2.34 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
AMRS vs LIN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 243.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LIN trades at $529.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check LIN's competition here
AMRS vs SHW Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SHW trades at $333.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SHW's competition here
AMRS vs ECL Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ECL trades at $274.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ECL's competition here
AMRS vs APD Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while APD trades at $299.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check APD's competition here
AMRS vs PPG Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PPG trades at $116.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check PPG's competition here
AMRS vs SQM Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SQM trades at $73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SQM's competition here
AMRS vs IFF Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IFF trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check IFF's competition here
AMRS vs DD Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while DD trades at $134.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check DD's competition here
AMRS vs ALB Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALB trades at $126.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ALB's competition here
AMRS vs RPM Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while RPM trades at $105.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check RPM's competition here
AMRS vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SOLS trades at $61.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SOLS's competition here
AMRS vs ESI Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ESI trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ESI's competition here
AMRS vs WLK Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while WLK trades at $75.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -53.91. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check WLK's competition here
AMRS vs NEU Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NEU trades at $763.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check NEU's competition here
AMRS vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AXTA trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check AXTA's competition here
AMRS vs SSL Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SSL trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SSL's competition here
AMRS vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ALTM's competition here
AMRS vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check IKNX's competition here
AMRS vs PRM Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PRM trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check PRM's competition here
AMRS vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while BCPC trades at $162.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check BCPC's competition here
AMRS vs CE Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CE trades at $46.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CE's competition here
AMRS vs SXT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SXT trades at $115.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SXT's competition here
AMRS vs CBT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CBT trades at $87.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CBT's competition here
AMRS vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while WDFC trades at $264.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check WDFC's competition here
AMRS vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AVNT trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check AVNT's competition here
AMRS vs ASH Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ASH trades at $66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ASH's competition here
AMRS vs FUL Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while FUL trades at $55.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check FUL's competition here
AMRS vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check LTHM's competition here
AMRS vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HWKN trades at $133.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check HWKN's competition here
AMRS vs CC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CC trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CC's competition here
AMRS vs KWR Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KWR trades at $148.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check KWR's competition here
AMRS vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NGVT trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check NGVT's competition here
AMRS vs OLN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while OLN trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check OLN's competition here
AMRS vs MTX Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while MTX trades at $72.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check MTX's competition here
AMRS vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while IOSP trades at $81.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check IOSP's competition here
AMRS vs PQG Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check PQG's competition here
AMRS vs REX Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while REX trades at $47.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check REX's competition here
AMRS vs ODC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ODC trades at $104.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ODC's competition here
AMRS vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ECVT trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ECVT's competition here
AMRS vs SCL Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SCL trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SCL's competition here
AMRS vs CCF Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CCF's competition here
AMRS vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GPRE trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check GPRE's competition here
AMRS vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LWLG trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -41.71. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check LWLG's competition here
AMRS vs KOP Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 915.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KOP trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check KOP's competition here
AMRS vs KRO Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 677.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KRO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check KRO's competition here
AMRS vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 436.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ALTO trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ALTO's competition here
AMRS vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 352.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GEVO trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check GEVO's competition here
AMRS vs OEC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while OEC trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check OEC's competition here
AMRS vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HDSN trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check HDSN's competition here
AMRS vs CMT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CMT trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CMT's competition here
AMRS vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ACNT trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -39.13. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ACNT's competition here
AMRS vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while NTIC trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -271.67. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check NTIC's competition here
AMRS vs FSI Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while FSI trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 99.33. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check FSI's competition here
AMRS vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while LOOP trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check LOOP's competition here
AMRS vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check VNTR's competition here
AMRS vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SDSTW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SDSTW's competition here
AMRS vs SDST Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while SDST trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check SDST's competition here
AMRS vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while YMAT trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check YMAT's competition here
AMRS vs GURE Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GURE trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check GURE's competition here
AMRS vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ORGN's competition here
AMRS vs TSE Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check TSE's competition here
AMRS vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CNEY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CNEY's competition here
AMRS vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check CRKN's competition here
AMRS vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check HGASW's competition here
AMRS vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AMRS has daily volatility of 25.02 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
AMRS vs FOE Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check FOE's competition here
AMRS vs GCP Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check GCP's competition here
AMRS vs ZY Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ZY's competition here
AMRS vs KMG Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check KMG's competition here
AMRS vs KRA Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check KRA's competition here
AMRS vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
AMRS vs ARG Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check ARG's competition here
AMRS vs TREC Comparison July 2026
AMRS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMRS stands at 0. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMRS is priced at $0.05, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMRS's ROE is +4.62%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMRS is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMRS.Check TREC's competition here