Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HWKN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWKN | $142.83 | +0.32% | 3B | 36.31 | $3.94 | +0.53% |
| LIN | $514.63 | +0.09% | 240.9B | 30.94 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $330.47 | -0.55% | 83.4B | 29.29 | $11.55 | +0.94% |
| ECL | $272.41 | +0.80% | 77.6B | 35.62 | $7.74 | +1.04% |
| APD | $296.04 | +0.80% | 66.2B | 23.14 | $12.84 | +2.43% |
| PPG | $117.21 | +1.65% | 26.5B | 15.44 | $7.69 | +2.40% |
| IFF | $77.94 | +3.49% | 19.8B | 18.26 | $4.25 | +2.07% |
| SQM | $69.23 | -3.20% | 19B | 23.26 | $2.86 | +1.54% |
| DD | $134.59 | -0.20% | 18.1B | 36.61 | $3.67 | +1.73% |
| ALB | $120.89 | -3.09% | 14.1B | 51.05 | $2.34 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
HWKN vs LIN Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 240.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while LIN trades at $514.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LIN's competition here
HWKN vs SHW Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SHW trades at $330.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SHW's competition here
HWKN vs ECL Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ECL trades at $272.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ECL's competition here
HWKN vs APD Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while APD trades at $296.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check APD's competition here
HWKN vs PPG Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while PPG trades at $117.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PPG's competition here
HWKN vs IFF Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while IFF trades at $77.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IFF's competition here
HWKN vs SQM Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SQM trades at $69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SQM's competition here
HWKN vs DD Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while DD trades at $134.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check DD's competition here
HWKN vs ALB Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ALB trades at $120.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALB's competition here
HWKN vs RPM Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while RPM trades at $105.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check RPM's competition here
HWKN vs WLK Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while WLK trades at $77.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.06. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check WLK's competition here
HWKN vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SOLS trades at $58.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SOLS's competition here
HWKN vs ESI Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ESI trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ESI's competition here
HWKN vs NEU Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while NEU trades at $769.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NEU's competition here
HWKN vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while AXTA trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AXTA's competition here
HWKN vs SSL Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SSL trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SSL's competition here
HWKN vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALTM's competition here
HWKN vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IKNX's competition here
HWKN vs PRM Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while PRM trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PRM's competition here
HWKN vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while BCPC trades at $163.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check BCPC's competition here
HWKN vs CE Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CE trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CE's competition here
HWKN vs SXT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SXT trades at $109.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SXT's competition here
HWKN vs CBT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CBT trades at $90.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CBT's competition here
HWKN vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while AVNT trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AVNT's competition here
HWKN vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while WDFC trades at $248.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check WDFC's competition here
HWKN vs ASH Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ASH trades at $68.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ASH's competition here
HWKN vs FUL Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while FUL trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FUL's competition here
HWKN vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LTHM's competition here
HWKN vs KWR Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while KWR trades at $151.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KWR's competition here
HWKN vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while NGVT trades at $76.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NGVT's competition here
HWKN vs CC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CC trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CC's competition here
HWKN vs OLN Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while OLN trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check OLN's competition here
HWKN vs MTX Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while MTX trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check MTX's competition here
HWKN vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while IOSP trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IOSP's competition here
HWKN vs PQG Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PQG's competition here
HWKN vs REX Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while REX trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check REX's competition here
HWKN vs ODC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ODC trades at $98.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ODC's competition here
HWKN vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ECVT trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ECVT's competition here
HWKN vs SCL Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SCL trades at $58.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SCL's competition here
HWKN vs CCF Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CCF's competition here
HWKN vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while GPRE trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GPRE's competition here
HWKN vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 969.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while LWLG trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LWLG's competition here
HWKN vs KOP Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 941.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while KOP trades at $48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KOP's competition here
HWKN vs KRO Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 766.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while KRO trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KRO's competition here
HWKN vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ALTO trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALTO's competition here
HWKN vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while GEVO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GEVO's competition here
HWKN vs OEC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while OEC trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check OEC's competition here
HWKN vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while HDSN trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check HDSN's competition here
HWKN vs CMT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CMT trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CMT's competition here
HWKN vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ACNT trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ACNT's competition here
HWKN vs FSI Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while FSI trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 101.25. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FSI's competition here
HWKN vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while NTIC trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -271.00. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NTIC's competition here
HWKN vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while LOOP trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LOOP's competition here
HWKN vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check VNTR's competition here
HWKN vs SDST Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SDST trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SDST's competition here
HWKN vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while SDSTW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SDSTW's competition here
HWKN vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while YMAT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check YMAT's competition here
HWKN vs GURE Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while GURE trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GURE's competition here
HWKN vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ORGN's competition here
HWKN vs TSE Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check TSE's competition here
HWKN vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CNEY trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CNEY's competition here
HWKN vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CRKN's competition here
HWKN vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check HGASW's competition here
HWKN vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HWKN has daily volatility of 5.65 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
HWKN vs GCP Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GCP's competition here
HWKN vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AMRS's competition here
HWKN vs ZY Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ZY's competition here
HWKN vs KMG Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KMG's competition here
HWKN vs KRA Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KRA's competition here
HWKN vs ARG Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ARG's competition here
HWKN vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
HWKN vs TREC Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check TREC's competition here
HWKN vs FOE Comparison July 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $142.83, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 36.31, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FOE's competition here