Lightwave Logic, Inc.
Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LWLG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWLG | $12.67 | -6.84% | 1.9B | -79.16 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| LIN | $510.30 | +0.44% | 236.5B | 34.90 | $14.62 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $337.70 | +0.01% | 83.7B | 32.91 | $10.26 | +0.94% |
| ECL | $269.49 | -0.72% | 76.1B | 37.69 | $7.15 | +1.03% |
| APD | $301.76 | -0.62% | 67.2B | -205.28 | -$1.47 | +2.37% |
| SQM | $88.79 | +3.91% | 25.4B | 43.11 | $2.06 | N/A |
| PPG | $109.80 | -0.44% | 24.6B | 15.87 | $6.92 | +2.56% |
| LYB | $69.87 | -1.20% | 22.5B | -28.19 | -$2.48 | +6.90% |
| ALB | $188.33 | -2.49% | 22.2B | -32.75 | -$5.75 | +0.87% |
| DD | $46.33 | -0.09% | 19B | 220.60 | $0.21 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
LWLG vs LIN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 236.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while LIN trades at $510.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check LIN's competition here
LWLG vs SHW Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SHW trades at $337.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SHW's competition here
LWLG vs ECL Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ECL trades at $269.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ECL's competition here
LWLG vs APD Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while APD trades at $301.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -205.28. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check APD's competition here
LWLG vs SQM Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SQM trades at $88.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 43.11. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SQM's competition here
LWLG vs PPG Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while PPG trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check PPG's competition here
LWLG vs LYB Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while LYB trades at $69.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -28.19. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check LYB's competition here
LWLG vs ALB Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ALB trades at $188.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ALB's competition here
LWLG vs DD Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while DD trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 220.60. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check DD's competition here
LWLG vs IFF Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while IFF trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -50.44. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check IFF's competition here
LWLG vs WLK Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while WLK trades at $110.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check WLK's competition here
LWLG vs RPM Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while RPM trades at $104.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check RPM's competition here
LWLG vs SOLS Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SOLS trades at $81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SOLS's competition here
LWLG vs ESI Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ESI trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 51.06. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ESI's competition here
LWLG vs EMN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while EMN trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check EMN's competition here
LWLG vs SSL Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SSL trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 55.91. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SSL's competition here
LWLG vs NEU Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while NEU trades at $696.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check NEU's competition here
LWLG vs AXTA Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while AXTA trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check AXTA's competition here
LWLG vs ALTM Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ALTM's competition here
LWLG vs IKNX Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check IKNX's competition here
LWLG vs BCPC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while BCPC trades at $173.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check BCPC's competition here
LWLG vs SXT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SXT trades at $123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SXT's competition here
LWLG vs PRM Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while PRM trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -22.51. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check PRM's competition here
LWLG vs CBT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CBT trades at $76.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CBT's competition here
LWLG vs CC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CC trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CC's competition here
LWLG vs HWKN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while HWKN trades at $170.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check HWKN's competition here
LWLG vs AVNT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while AVNT trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check AVNT's competition here
LWLG vs FUL Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while FUL trades at $62.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check FUL's competition here
LWLG vs OLN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while OLN trades at $26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -30.41. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check OLN's competition here
LWLG vs WDFC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while WDFC trades at $224.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check WDFC's competition here
LWLG vs LTHM Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check LTHM's competition here
LWLG vs NGVT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while NGVT trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check NGVT's competition here
LWLG vs ASH Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ASH trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ASH's competition here
LWLG vs KWR Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while KWR trades at $140.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -1007.11. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check KWR's competition here
LWLG vs MTX Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while MTX trades at $71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -121.56. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check MTX's competition here
LWLG vs PQG Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check PQG's competition here
LWLG vs IOSP Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while IOSP trades at $77.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check IOSP's competition here
LWLG vs REX Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while REX trades at $46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check REX's competition here
LWLG vs ECVT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ECVT trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 276.40. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ECVT's competition here
LWLG vs CCF Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CCF's competition here
LWLG vs SCL Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SCL trades at $52.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SCL's competition here
LWLG vs GPRE Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while GPRE trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check GPRE's competition here
LWLG vs ODC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ODC trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ODC's competition here
LWLG vs KRO Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 819.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while KRO trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check KRO's competition here
LWLG vs KOP Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 791.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while KOP trades at $40.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check KOP's competition here
LWLG vs GEVO Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 437.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while GEVO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check GEVO's competition here
LWLG vs OEC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while OEC trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check OEC's competition here
LWLG vs ALTO Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ALTO trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ALTO's competition here
LWLG vs ADUR Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 403M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ADUR trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -27.79. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ADUR's competition here
LWLG vs HDSN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while HDSN trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check HDSN's competition here
LWLG vs CMT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CMT trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CMT's competition here
LWLG vs FSI Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while FSI trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 109.67. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check FSI's competition here
LWLG vs NTIC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while NTIC trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -89.11. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check NTIC's competition here
LWLG vs LOOP Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while LOOP trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check LOOP's competition here
LWLG vs VNTR Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check VNTR's competition here
LWLG vs SNES Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while SNES trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check SNES's competition here
LWLG vs GURE Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while GURE trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check GURE's competition here
LWLG vs TSE Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check TSE's competition here
LWLG vs YMAT Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while YMAT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check YMAT's competition here
LWLG vs CNEY Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CNEY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CNEY's competition here
LWLG vs DNMR Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check DNMR's competition here
LWLG vs CRKN Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check CRKN's competition here
LWLG vs HGAS Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 200.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HGAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check HGAS's competition here
LWLG vs HGASW Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check HGASW's competition here
LWLG vs MOOV Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LWLG has daily volatility of 15.93 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LWLG vs FOE Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check FOE's competition here
LWLG vs GCP Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check GCP's competition here
LWLG vs AMRS Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check AMRS's competition here
LWLG vs TREC Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check TREC's competition here
LWLG vs ZY Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ZY's competition here
LWLG vs KRA Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check KRA's competition here
LWLG vs ARG Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check ARG's competition here
LWLG vs AVTR-PA Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LWLG vs KMG Comparison April 2026
LWLG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LWLG stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LWLG is priced at $12.67, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LWLG currently has a P/E ratio of -79.16, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWLG's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LWLG is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWLG.Check KMG's competition here