Cabot Corp. (CBT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT | $91.11 | +3.84% | 4.6B | 13.33 | $6.74 | +2.02% |
| LIN | $518.02 | -0.86% | 237.8B | 30.55 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $336.80 | +2.53% | 82B | 28.78 | $11.55 | +0.96% |
| ECL | $273.20 | +1.28% | 76.1B | 34.92 | $7.74 | +1.05% |
| APD | $296.21 | -1.07% | 65.4B | 22.89 | $12.84 | +2.45% |
| PPG | $117.78 | +2.72% | 25.7B | 14.99 | $7.69 | +2.45% |
| SQM | $66.56 | -8.76% | 20.4B | 25.07 | $2.86 | +1.42% |
| IFF | $76.89 | +2.97% | 19.2B | 17.72 | $4.25 | +2.12% |
| DD | $133.22 | -0.71% | 18.2B | 36.76 | $3.67 | +1.72% |
| ALB | $118.46 | -7.99% | 14.7B | 53.32 | $2.34 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
CBT vs LIN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 237.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while LIN trades at $518.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LIN's competition here
CBT vs SHW Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SHW trades at $336.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SHW's competition here
CBT vs ECL Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ECL trades at $273.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ECL's competition here
CBT vs APD Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while APD trades at $296.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check APD's competition here
CBT vs PPG Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while PPG trades at $117.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PPG's competition here
CBT vs SQM Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SQM trades at $66.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SQM's competition here
CBT vs IFF Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while IFF trades at $76.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IFF's competition here
CBT vs DD Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while DD trades at $133.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.76. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check DD's competition here
CBT vs ALB Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ALB trades at $118.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 53.32. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALB's competition here
CBT vs RPM Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while RPM trades at $105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check RPM's competition here
CBT vs WLK Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while WLK trades at $77.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.02. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check WLK's competition here
CBT vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SOLS trades at $58.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SOLS's competition here
CBT vs ESI Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ESI trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ESI's competition here
CBT vs SSL Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SSL trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SSL's competition here
CBT vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while AXTA trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AXTA's competition here
CBT vs NEU Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while NEU trades at $770.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NEU's competition here
CBT vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALTM's competition here
CBT vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IKNX's competition here
CBT vs PRM Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while PRM trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PRM's competition here
CBT vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while BCPC trades at $165.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check BCPC's competition here
CBT vs CE Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CE trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CE's competition here
CBT vs SXT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SXT trades at $111.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SXT's competition here
CBT vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while WDFC trades at $257.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check WDFC's competition here
CBT vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while AVNT trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AVNT's competition here
CBT vs ASH Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ASH trades at $68.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ASH's competition here
CBT vs FUL Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while FUL trades at $57.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FUL's competition here
CBT vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while HWKN trades at $142.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HWKN's competition here
CBT vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LTHM's competition here
CBT vs CC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CC trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CC's competition here
CBT vs KWR Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while KWR trades at $154.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KWR's competition here
CBT vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while NGVT trades at $74.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NGVT's competition here
CBT vs OLN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while OLN trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check OLN's competition here
CBT vs MTX Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while MTX trades at $75.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check MTX's competition here
CBT vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while IOSP trades at $85.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check IOSP's competition here
CBT vs PQG Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check PQG's competition here
CBT vs REX Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while REX trades at $46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check REX's competition here
CBT vs ODC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ODC trades at $103.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ODC's competition here
CBT vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ECVT trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ECVT's competition here
CBT vs SCL Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SCL trades at $59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SCL's competition here
CBT vs CCF Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CCF's competition here
CBT vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while GPRE trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GPRE's competition here
CBT vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while LWLG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -39.71. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LWLG's competition here
CBT vs KOP Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while KOP trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KOP's competition here
CBT vs KRO Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 772M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while KRO trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KRO's competition here
CBT vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ALTO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ALTO's competition here
CBT vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while GEVO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GEVO's competition here
CBT vs OEC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while OEC trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check OEC's competition here
CBT vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while HDSN trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HDSN's competition here
CBT vs CMT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CMT trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CMT's competition here
CBT vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ACNT trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ACNT's competition here
CBT vs FSI Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while FSI trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 103.17. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FSI's competition here
CBT vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while NTIC trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -273.33. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check NTIC's competition here
CBT vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while LOOP trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check LOOP's competition here
CBT vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check VNTR's competition here
CBT vs SDST Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SDST trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SDST's competition here
CBT vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check SDSTW's competition here
CBT vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while YMAT trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check YMAT's competition here
CBT vs GURE Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while GURE trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GURE's competition here
CBT vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ORGN's competition here
CBT vs TSE Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check TSE's competition here
CBT vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CNEY trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CNEY's competition here
CBT vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check CRKN's competition here
CBT vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check HGASW's competition here
CBT vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CBT has daily volatility of 3.00 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
CBT vs ZY Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ZY's competition here
CBT vs KMG Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KMG's competition here
CBT vs TREC Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check TREC's competition here
CBT vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
CBT vs KRA Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check KRA's competition here
CBT vs ARG Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check ARG's competition here
CBT vs FOE Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check FOE's competition here
CBT vs GCP Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check GCP's competition here
CBT vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
CBT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBT stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBT is priced at $91.11, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CBT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CBT is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBT.Check AMRS's competition here