Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSI | $6.00 | -3.07% | 77.4M | 101.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| LIN | $514.75 | +0.12% | 240.9B | 30.94 | $16.83 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $331.49 | -0.24% | 83.4B | 29.29 | $11.55 | +0.94% |
| ECL | $273.11 | +1.06% | 77.6B | 35.62 | $7.74 | +1.04% |
| APD | $296.52 | +0.96% | 66.2B | 23.14 | $12.84 | +2.43% |
| PPG | $117.67 | +2.05% | 26.5B | 15.44 | $7.69 | +2.40% |
| IFF | $78.11 | +3.71% | 19.8B | 18.26 | $4.25 | +2.07% |
| SQM | $69.94 | -2.21% | 19B | 23.26 | $2.86 | +1.54% |
| DD | $135.23 | +0.27% | 18.1B | 36.61 | $3.67 | +1.73% |
| ALB | $121.51 | -2.59% | 14.1B | 51.05 | $2.34 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
FSI vs LIN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 240.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while LIN trades at $514.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LIN's competition here
FSI vs SHW Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SHW trades at $331.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SHW's competition here
FSI vs ECL Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ECL trades at $273.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ECL's competition here
FSI vs APD Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while APD trades at $296.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check APD's competition here
FSI vs PPG Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while PPG trades at $117.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PPG's competition here
FSI vs IFF Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while IFF trades at $78.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IFF's competition here
FSI vs SQM Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SQM trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SQM's competition here
FSI vs DD Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while DD trades at $135.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check DD's competition here
FSI vs ALB Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ALB trades at $121.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALB's competition here
FSI vs RPM Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while RPM trades at $105.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check RPM's competition here
FSI vs WLK Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while WLK trades at $77.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -55.06. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check WLK's competition here
FSI vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SOLS trades at $59.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SOLS's competition here
FSI vs ESI Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ESI trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ESI's competition here
FSI vs NEU Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while NEU trades at $772.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NEU's competition here
FSI vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while AXTA trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AXTA's competition here
FSI vs SSL Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SSL trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SSL's competition here
FSI vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALTM's competition here
FSI vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IKNX's competition here
FSI vs PRM Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while PRM trades at $34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PRM's competition here
FSI vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while BCPC trades at $163.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check BCPC's competition here
FSI vs CE Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CE trades at $45.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CE's competition here
FSI vs SXT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SXT trades at $109.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SXT's competition here
FSI vs CBT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CBT trades at $90.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CBT's competition here
FSI vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while AVNT trades at $37.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AVNT's competition here
FSI vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while WDFC trades at $248.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check WDFC's competition here
FSI vs ASH Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ASH trades at $68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ASH's competition here
FSI vs FUL Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while FUL trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check FUL's competition here
FSI vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while HWKN trades at $142.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HWKN's competition here
FSI vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LTHM's competition here
FSI vs KWR Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while KWR trades at $151.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KWR's competition here
FSI vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while NGVT trades at $76.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NGVT's competition here
FSI vs CC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CC trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CC's competition here
FSI vs OLN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while OLN trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check OLN's competition here
FSI vs MTX Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while MTX trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check MTX's competition here
FSI vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while IOSP trades at $84.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IOSP's competition here
FSI vs PQG Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PQG's competition here
FSI vs REX Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while REX trades at $47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check REX's competition here
FSI vs ODC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ODC trades at $98.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ODC's competition here
FSI vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ECVT trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ECVT's competition here
FSI vs SCL Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SCL trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SCL's competition here
FSI vs CCF Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CCF's competition here
FSI vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while GPRE trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GPRE's competition here
FSI vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 969.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while LWLG trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LWLG's competition here
FSI vs KOP Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 941.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while KOP trades at $48.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KOP's competition here
FSI vs KRO Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 766.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while KRO trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KRO's competition here
FSI vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ALTO trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALTO's competition here
FSI vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 387M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while GEVO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GEVO's competition here
FSI vs OEC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 376.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while OEC trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check OEC's competition here
FSI vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while HDSN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HDSN's competition here
FSI vs CMT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CMT trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CMT's competition here
FSI vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ACNT trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.77. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ACNT's competition here
FSI vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while NTIC trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -271.00. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NTIC's competition here
FSI vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while LOOP trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LOOP's competition here
FSI vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check VNTR's competition here
FSI vs SDST Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SDST trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SDST's competition here
FSI vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while SDSTW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SDSTW's competition here
FSI vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while YMAT trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check YMAT's competition here
FSI vs GURE Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while GURE trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GURE's competition here
FSI vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ORGN's competition here
FSI vs TSE Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check TSE's competition here
FSI vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CNEY trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CNEY's competition here
FSI vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CRKN's competition here
FSI vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HGASW's competition here
FSI vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FSI has daily volatility of 3.50 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
FSI vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AMRS's competition here
FSI vs ZY Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ZY's competition here
FSI vs KMG Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KMG's competition here
FSI vs ARG Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ARG's competition here
FSI vs KRA Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KRA's competition here
FSI vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
FSI vs TREC Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check TREC's competition here
FSI vs FOE Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check FOE's competition here
FSI vs GCP Comparison July 2026
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 77.4M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $6.00, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 101.25, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GCP's competition here