Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWR | $149.87 | +1.15% | 2.6B | 20.91 | $7.07 | +1.36% |
| LIN | $522.40 | -1.39% | 242.4B | 31.14 | $16.83 | +1.18% |
| SHW | $329.34 | -1.39% | 81.1B | 28.49 | $11.55 | +0.97% |
| ECL | $270.95 | -1.22% | 76.5B | 35.13 | $7.74 | +1.05% |
| APD | $301.49 | +0.65% | 67.3B | 23.53 | $12.84 | +2.38% |
| PPG | $114.40 | -2.02% | 25.4B | 14.80 | $7.69 | +2.50% |
| SQM | $72.55 | -0.88% | 20.6B | 25.20 | $2.86 | +1.40% |
| IFF | $75.41 | -2.73% | 19.2B | 17.67 | $4.25 | +2.13% |
| DD | $134.43 | -0.19% | 17.9B | 36.16 | $3.67 | +1.75% |
| ALB | $128.46 | +1.91% | 14.8B | 53.76 | $2.34 | +1.29% |
Stock Comparison
KWR vs LIN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 242.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while LIN trades at $522.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check LIN's competition here
KWR vs SHW Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SHW trades at $329.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SHW's competition here
KWR vs ECL Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ECL trades at $270.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ECL's competition here
KWR vs APD Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while APD trades at $301.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check APD's competition here
KWR vs PPG Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while PPG trades at $114.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check PPG's competition here
KWR vs SQM Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SQM trades at $72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SQM's competition here
KWR vs IFF Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while IFF trades at $75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check IFF's competition here
KWR vs DD Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while DD trades at $134.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check DD's competition here
KWR vs ALB Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ALB trades at $128.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ALB's competition here
KWR vs RPM Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while RPM trades at $102.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check RPM's competition here
KWR vs WLK Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while WLK trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check WLK's competition here
KWR vs SOLS Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SOLS trades at $63.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SOLS's competition here
KWR vs ESI Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ESI trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ESI's competition here
KWR vs SSL Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SSL trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SSL's competition here
KWR vs NEU Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while NEU trades at $741.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check NEU's competition here
KWR vs AXTA Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while AXTA trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check AXTA's competition here
KWR vs ALTM Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ALTM's competition here
KWR vs IKNX Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check IKNX's competition here
KWR vs PRM Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while PRM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check PRM's competition here
KWR vs CE Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CE trades at $47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CE's competition here
KWR vs BCPC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while BCPC trades at $161.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check BCPC's competition here
KWR vs SXT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SXT trades at $114.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SXT's competition here
KWR vs CBT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CBT trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CBT's competition here
KWR vs WDFC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while WDFC trades at $249.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check WDFC's competition here
KWR vs AVNT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while AVNT trades at $35.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check AVNT's competition here
KWR vs ASH Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ASH trades at $66.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ASH's competition here
KWR vs FUL Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while FUL trades at $56.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check FUL's competition here
KWR vs LTHM Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check LTHM's competition here
KWR vs HWKN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while HWKN trades at $136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check HWKN's competition here
KWR vs CC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CC trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CC's competition here
KWR vs NGVT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while NGVT trades at $72.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check NGVT's competition here
KWR vs OLN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while OLN trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -27.12. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check OLN's competition here
KWR vs MTX Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while MTX trades at $72.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check MTX's competition here
KWR vs IOSP Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while IOSP trades at $82.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check IOSP's competition here
KWR vs PQG Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check PQG's competition here
KWR vs REX Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while REX trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check REX's competition here
KWR vs ODC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ODC trades at $103.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ODC's competition here
KWR vs ECVT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ECVT trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ECVT's competition here
KWR vs SCL Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SCL trades at $57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SCL's competition here
KWR vs CCF Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CCF's competition here
KWR vs GPRE Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while GPRE trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check GPRE's competition here
KWR vs LWLG Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 996.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while LWLG trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -38.06. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check LWLG's competition here
KWR vs KOP Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 919.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while KOP trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check KOP's competition here
KWR vs KRO Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 743.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while KRO trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check KRO's competition here
KWR vs ALTO Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 454.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ALTO trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ALTO's competition here
KWR vs GEVO Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while GEVO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check GEVO's competition here
KWR vs OEC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while OEC trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check OEC's competition here
KWR vs HDSN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 260.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while HDSN trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check HDSN's competition here
KWR vs CMT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CMT trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CMT's competition here
KWR vs ACNT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ACNT trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -38.92. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ACNT's competition here
KWR vs NTIC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while NTIC trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check NTIC's competition here
KWR vs FSI Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while FSI trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 95.85. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check FSI's competition here
KWR vs LOOP Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while LOOP trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check LOOP's competition here
KWR vs VNTR Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check VNTR's competition here
KWR vs SDST Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SDST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SDST's competition here
KWR vs SDSTW Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check SDSTW's competition here
KWR vs YMAT Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while YMAT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMAT's ROE of -6.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check YMAT's competition here
KWR vs GURE Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while GURE trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check GURE's competition here
KWR vs ORGN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ORGN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ORGN's competition here
KWR vs TSE Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check TSE's competition here
KWR vs CNEY Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CNEY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CNEY's competition here
KWR vs CRKN Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 46K. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while CRKN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check CRKN's competition here
KWR vs HGASW Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check HGASW's competition here
KWR vs MOOV Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KWR has daily volatility of 1.80 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
KWR vs ARG Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ARG's competition here
KWR vs AMRS Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check AMRS's competition here
KWR vs ZY Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check ZY's competition here
KWR vs KMG Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check KMG's competition here
KWR vs GCP Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check GCP's competition here
KWR vs TREC Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check TREC's competition here
KWR vs KRA Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check KRA's competition here
KWR vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
KWR vs FOE Comparison July 2026
KWR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KWR stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KWR is priced at $149.87, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KWR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.91, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KWR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KWR is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KWR.Check FOE's competition here