SenesTech, Inc. (SNES) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNES | $1.65 | +1.21% | 8.8M | -1.56 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| LIN | $516.71 | +0.89% | 239B | 34.31 | $15.06 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $316.97 | -1.19% | 78.2B | 30.39 | $10.43 | +0.99% |
| ECL | $269.69 | +0.21% | 75.8B | 36.40 | $7.40 | +1.06% |
| APD | $283.09 | +1.03% | 63B | 29.80 | $9.50 | +2.56% |
| PPG | $118.96 | +0.60% | 26.5B | 17.04 | $6.98 | +2.40% |
| SQM | $78.63 | -1.33% | 22.5B | 27.49 | $2.86 | +1.28% |
| DD | $48.06 | +0.73% | 19.7B | 126.74 | $0.38 | +1.62% |
| IFF | $75.91 | -1.06% | 19.4B | 23.52 | $3.23 | +2.09% |
| ALB | $156.18 | -2.60% | 18.5B | -45.79 | -$3.42 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
SNES vs LIN Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 239B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while LIN trades at $516.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LIN's competition here
SNES vs SHW Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SHW trades at $316.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SHW's competition here
SNES vs ECL Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ECL trades at $269.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ECL's competition here
SNES vs APD Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while APD trades at $283.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check APD's competition here
SNES vs PPG Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while PPG trades at $118.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PPG's competition here
SNES vs SQM Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SQM trades at $78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SQM's competition here
SNES vs DD Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while DD trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 126.74. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check DD's competition here
SNES vs IFF Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while IFF trades at $75.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IFF's competition here
SNES vs ALB Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ALB trades at $156.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -45.79. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALB's competition here
SNES vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SOLS trades at $86.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SOLS's competition here
SNES vs RPM Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while RPM trades at $107.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check RPM's competition here
SNES vs ESI Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ESI trades at $48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 79.22. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ESI's competition here
SNES vs WLK Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while WLK trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check WLK's competition here
SNES vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while AXTA trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AXTA's competition here
SNES vs SSL Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SSL trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SSL's competition here
SNES vs NEU Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while NEU trades at $780.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NEU's competition here
SNES vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALTM's competition here
SNES vs PRM Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while PRM trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PRM's competition here
SNES vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IKNX's competition here
SNES vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while BCPC trades at $165.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check BCPC's competition here
SNES vs SXT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SXT trades at $119.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SXT's competition here
SNES vs CBT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CBT trades at $90.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CBT's competition here
SNES vs FUL Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while FUL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FUL's competition here
SNES vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while AVNT trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AVNT's competition here
SNES vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while HWKN trades at $161.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HWKN's competition here
SNES vs CC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CC trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CC's competition here
SNES vs ASH Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ASH trades at $67.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ASH's competition here
SNES vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while WDFC trades at $223.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check WDFC's competition here
SNES vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LTHM's competition here
SNES vs KWR Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while KWR trades at $150.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 579.38. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KWR's competition here
SNES vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while NGVT trades at $72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NGVT's competition here
SNES vs OLN Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while OLN trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check OLN's competition here
SNES vs MTX Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while MTX trades at $77.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check MTX's competition here
SNES vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while IOSP trades at $82.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IOSP's competition here
SNES vs PQG Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PQG's competition here
SNES vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while LWLG trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -62.69. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LWLG's competition here
SNES vs REX Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while REX trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check REX's competition here
SNES vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ECVT trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.74. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ECVT's competition here
SNES vs ODC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ODC trades at $93.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ODC's competition here
SNES vs SCL Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while SCL trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -86.29. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SCL's competition here
SNES vs CCF Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CCF's competition here
SNES vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while GPRE trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -83.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GPRE's competition here
SNES vs KOP Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while KOP trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KOP's competition here
SNES vs KRO Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while KRO trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KRO's competition here
SNES vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ALTO trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALTO's competition here
SNES vs OEC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 403.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while OEC trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check OEC's competition here
SNES vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while GEVO trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GEVO's competition here
SNES vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while HDSN trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HDSN's competition here
SNES vs CMT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CMT trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CMT's competition here
SNES vs FSI Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while FSI trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 107.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FSI's competition here
SNES vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while NTIC trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -91.22. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NTIC's competition here
SNES vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while LOOP trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LOOP's competition here
SNES vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check VNTR's competition here
SNES vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while YMAT trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check YMAT's competition here
SNES vs GURE Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while GURE trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GURE's competition here
SNES vs TSE Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check TSE's competition here
SNES vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CNEY trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CNEY's competition here
SNES vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 277.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while CRKN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CRKN's competition here
SNES vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HGASW's competition here
SNES vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SNES has daily volatility of 4.91 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
SNES vs KRA Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KRA's competition here
SNES vs ARG Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ARG's competition here
SNES vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AMRS's competition here
SNES vs ZY Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ZY's competition here
SNES vs GCP Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GCP's competition here
SNES vs FOE Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FOE's competition here
SNES vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
SNES vs TREC Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check TREC's competition here
SNES vs KMG Comparison June 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $1.65, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.76%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KMG's competition here