LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
LyondellBasell Industries N.V. LYB Peers
See (LYB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYB | $62.27 | +7.61% | 19.7B | 21.18 | $2.89 | +8.79% |
| LIN | $475.22 | +1.29% | 224.4B | 34.57 | $13.79 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $352.53 | +2.67% | 89B | 33.62 | $10.57 | +0.85% |
| ECL | $270.59 | +0.43% | 77.3B | 37.14 | $7.34 | +0.92% |
| APD | $286.80 | +1.68% | 63.5B | 41.05 | $6.95 | +2.49% |
| DD | $72.36 | +5.50% | 29.9B | 2382.17 | $0.03 | +2.21% |
| PPG | $118.05 | +3.78% | 26.4B | 20.60 | $5.65 | +2.33% |
| IFF | $75.85 | +3.13% | 19.2B | -23.04 | -$3.26 | +2.13% |
| RPM | $112.75 | +2.65% | 14.4B | 22.54 | $4.99 | +1.76% |
| WLK | $81.87 | +7.82% | 10.3B | 26.92 | $2.99 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
LYB vs LIN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 224.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while LIN trades at $475.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SHW Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SHW trades at $352.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ECL Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ECL trades at $270.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs APD Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while APD trades at $286.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs DD Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while DD trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2382.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs PPG Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while PPG trades at $118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs IFF Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while IFF trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs RPM Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while RPM trades at $112.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs WLK Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while WLK trades at $81.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SQM Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SQM trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs AVTR Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while AVTR trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs EMN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while EMN trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ALB Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ALB trades at $68.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs AXTA Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while AXTA trades at $30.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs NEU Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while NEU trades at $709.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ALTM Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs IKNX Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ESI Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ESI trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs BCPC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while BCPC trades at $162.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SXT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SXT trades at $104.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CBT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CBT trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs FUL Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while FUL trades at $62.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB and FUL have similar daily volatility (2.90).
LYB vs WDFC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while WDFC trades at $231.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs AVNT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while AVNT trades at $33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs HWKN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while HWKN trades at $144.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SSL Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SSL trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs LTHM Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs OLN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while OLN trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ASH Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ASH trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.93. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs IOSP Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while IOSP trades at $87.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 80.62. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs KWR Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while KWR trades at $120.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs PRM Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while PRM trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs PQG Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CC trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 68.53. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs MTX Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while MTX trades at $58.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -73.81. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs NGVT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while NGVT trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SCL Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SCL trades at $57.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CCF Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ECVT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 891.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ECVT trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -75.90. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs REX Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 817.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while REX trades at $50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ODC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 799.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ODC trades at $60.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs KRO Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while KRO trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs KOP Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 664.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while KOP trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs OEC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while OEC trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs GPRE Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while GPRE trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs HDSN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 359.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while HDSN trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs GEVO Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while GEVO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ADUR Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ADUR trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -31.28. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CMT Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CMT trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs LWLG Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while LWLG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs TSE Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while TSE trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ALTO Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ALTO trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs NTIC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while NTIC trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs LOOP Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while LOOP trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs FSI Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while FSI trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs VNTR Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs GURE Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while GURE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs SNES Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while SNES trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CNEY Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CNEY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs CRKN Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while CRKN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs DNMR Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs HGAS Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 660.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while HGAS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs HGASW Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs MOOV Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LYB has daily volatility of 2.90 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
LYB vs TREC Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs GCP Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs AMRS Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs AVTR-PA Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs KRA Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs FOE Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.
LYB vs ZY Comparison
LYB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYB stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LYB is priced at $62.27, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.18, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LYB's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYB is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYB.