Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $524.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MSFT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 451.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $196.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 163.49. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLTR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 381.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $126.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ORCL's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $380.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 101.21. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PANW's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $257.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 250.68. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWD's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $179.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FTNT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $325.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 322.58. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NET's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $430.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SNPS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VMW's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQ's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $76.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check XYZ's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $261.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TWLO's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $213.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check OKTA's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $54.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWV's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $371.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MDB's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NETE's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $300.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRSN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $408.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CPAY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $128.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 476.59. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RBRK's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SPLK's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check IOT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $455.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FFIV's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FLT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CYBR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $70.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTNX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $91.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KSPI's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TOST's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $159.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CHKP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GEN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GENVR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NLOK's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $112.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GDDY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $93.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AKAM's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 77.82. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SAIL's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CFLT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $93.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOCN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAYP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTSK's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ALTR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLAN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $37.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DBX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas S's P/E ratio is 109.05. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to S. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check S's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check INFA's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $216.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check QLYS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PATH's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check HCP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check JCOM's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $62.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $197.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WEX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQSP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NEWR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $43.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BOX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $55.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ACIW's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CCCS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $48.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 212.52. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRNS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MBGL's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $24.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RELY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BB's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $44.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TENB's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NVEI's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DLO's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZW's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZZ's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZ's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $38.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FOUR's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ESMT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check APPN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVPT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $34.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TDC's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SWI's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CLBT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVOP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $39.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTCT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STNE's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $65.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EEFT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAYO's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $38.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RAMP's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CSGS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $58.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GCT's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVDX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GETVV's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FORG's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $46.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PRGS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GSKY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ATEN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $48.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 229.72. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NYAX's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 193.93. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MQ's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PICS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PICS's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GET's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STER's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PGY's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ZUO's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SUMO's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GB's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NN's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BASE's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $44.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BAND's competition here

Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 41.6B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $255.15 on the NASDAQ, while RDWR trades at $31.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 64.76, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RDWR's competition here