Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS | $123.80 | -2.73% | 20B | 31.42 | $3.94 | N/A |
| MSFT | $352.83 | -3.46% | 2.6T | 21.79 | $16.19 | +1.01% |
| ORCL | $152.65 | -3.10% | 438.9B | 20.00 | $7.63 | +1.32% |
| PLTR | $107.27 | -5.49% | 246.3B | 112.92 | $0.95 | N/A |
| PANW | $293.09 | +2.74% | 199.7B | 77.95 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $678.65 | +0.84% | 172.8B | 165.12 | $4.11 | N/A |
| FTNT | $149.93 | +3.20% | 109.8B | 49.81 | $3.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $455.02 | -1.92% | 87.1B | 33.93 | $13.41 | N/A |
| NET | $226.65 | +1.42% | 80.4B | 224.40 | $1.01 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZS vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while MSFT trades at $352.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MSFT's competition here
ZS vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 438.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ORCL trades at $152.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ORCL's competition here
ZS vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 246.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PLTR trades at $107.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 112.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLTR's competition here
ZS vs PANW Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PANW trades at $293.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 77.95. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PANW's competition here
ZS vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CRWD trades at $678.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 165.12. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWD's competition here
ZS vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while FTNT trades at $149.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 49.81. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FTNT's competition here
ZS vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SNPS trades at $455.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SNPS's competition here
ZS vs NET Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NET trades at $226.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 224.40. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NET's competition here
ZS vs VMW Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VMW's competition here
ZS vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CRWV trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -42.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWV's competition here
ZS vs SQ Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQ's competition here
ZS vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while XYZ trades at $74.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check XYZ's competition here
ZS vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while TWLO trades at $190.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TWLO's competition here
ZS vs NETE Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NETE's competition here
ZS vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SPLK's competition here
ZS vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while AFRM trades at $76.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 69.86. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AFRM's competition here
ZS vs MDB Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while MDB trades at $294.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MDB's competition here
ZS vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while VRSN trades at $250.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRSN's competition here
ZS vs FLT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FLT's competition here
ZS vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while FFIV trades at $386.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FFIV's competition here
ZS vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CPAY trades at $325.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CPAY's competition here
ZS vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CYBR's competition here
ZS vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while OKTA trades at $119.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check OKTA's competition here
ZS vs IOT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while IOT trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 46.73. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check IOT's competition here
ZS vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while AKAM trades at $112.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AKAM's competition here
ZS vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while KSPI trades at $86.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KSPI's competition here
ZS vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while DOCN trades at $145.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 80.67. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOCN's competition here
ZS vs TOST Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while TOST trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TOST's competition here
ZS vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while RBRK trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 263.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RBRK's competition here
ZS vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NLOK's competition here
ZS vs GEN Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GEN trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GEN's competition here
ZS vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CHKP trades at $122.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CHKP's competition here
ZS vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NTNX trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTNX's competition here
ZS vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CFLT's competition here
ZS vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GDDY trades at $79.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GDDY's competition here
ZS vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PAYP trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAYP's competition here
ZS vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ALTR's competition here
ZS vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLAN's competition here
ZS vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CORZZ trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZZ's competition here
ZS vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CORZ trades at $27.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZ's competition here
ZS vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CORZW trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -18.63. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZW's competition here
ZS vs INFA Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check INFA's competition here
ZS vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SAIL trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 45.32. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SAIL's competition here
ZS vs HCP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check HCP's competition here
ZS vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while KLAR trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KLAR's competition here
ZS vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check JCOM's competition here
ZS vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQSP's competition here
ZS vs DBX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while DBX trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DBX's competition here
ZS vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NEWR's competition here
ZS vs BB Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while BB trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BB's competition here
ZS vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CCCS's competition here
ZS vs DOX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while DOX trades at $49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOX's competition here
ZS vs PATH Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PATH trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PATH's competition here
ZS vs S Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while S trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas S's P/E ratio is 68.02. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check S's competition here
ZS vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NVEI's competition here
ZS vs ACIW Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ACIW trades at $46.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ACIW's competition here
ZS vs WEX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while WEX trades at $133.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WEX's competition here
ZS vs RELY Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while RELY trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RELY's competition here
ZS vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while VRNS trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 167.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRNS's competition here
ZS vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while KVYO trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -468.17. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KVYO's competition here
ZS vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while QLYS trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check QLYS's competition here
ZS vs FOUR Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while FOUR trades at $43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FOUR's competition here
ZS vs ESMT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ESMT's competition here
ZS vs DLO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while DLO trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DLO's competition here
ZS vs BLSH Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while BLSH trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 58.23. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BLSH's competition here
ZS vs SWI Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SWI's competition here
ZS vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CLBT trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CLBT's competition here
ZS vs TENB Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while TENB trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TENB's competition here
ZS vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVOP's competition here
ZS vs TDC Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while TDC trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TDC's competition here
ZS vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while NTCT trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTCT's competition here
ZS vs CCC Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CCC trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CCC's competition here
ZS vs STNE Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while STNE trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STNE's competition here
ZS vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while EEFT trades at $67.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EEFT's competition here
ZS vs PAGS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PAGS trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAGS's competition here
ZS vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ATEN trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ATEN's competition here
ZS vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PAYO trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAYO's competition here
ZS vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CSGS's competition here
ZS vs WIX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while WIX trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WIX's competition here
ZS vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while RAMP trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RAMP's competition here
ZS vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while AVPT trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVPT's competition here
ZS vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVDX's competition here
ZS vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GETVV's competition here
ZS vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SPSC trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SPSC's competition here
ZS vs FORG Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FORG's competition here
ZS vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GSKY's competition here
ZS vs GET Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GET's competition here
ZS vs BAND Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while BAND trades at $52.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BAND's competition here
ZS vs MQ Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while MQ trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 731.48. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MQ's competition here
ZS vs WRD Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while WRD trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WRD's competition here
ZS vs STER Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STER's competition here
ZS vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while EVTC trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVTC's competition here
ZS vs RXT Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while RXT trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RXT's competition here
ZS vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while EVCM trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 67.23. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVCM's competition here
ZS vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ZUO's competition here
ZS vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SUMO's competition here
ZS vs GB Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GB's competition here
ZS vs BASE Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BASE's competition here
ZS vs PICS Comparison June 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 20B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $123.80, while PICS trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.42, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PICS's competition here