Payoneer Global Inc.

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while MSFT trades at $405.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check MSFT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 537.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ORCL trades at $190.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ORCL's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 312.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PLTR trades at $129.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 152.81. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PLTR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PANW trades at $224.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 119.12. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PANW's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CRWD trades at $561.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -866.95. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CRWD's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SNPS trades at $506.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 78.83. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SNPS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ADBE trades at $235.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ADBE's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FTNT trades at $116.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FTNT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NET trades at $192.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -747.76. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NET's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check VMW's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CRWV trades at $112.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -39.61. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CRWV's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SQ's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while XYZ trades at $70.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 56.37. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check XYZ's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NETE's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SPLK's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while VRSN trades at $293.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check VRSN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while MDB trades at $304.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -350.82. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check MDB's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ZS trades at $152.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -339.93. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ZS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CPAY trades at $329.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CPAY's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while AFRM trades at $63.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 59.48. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check AFRM's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FLT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while AKAM trades at $161.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check AKAM's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CYBR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FFIV trades at $359.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FFIV's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while KSPI trades at $87.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check KSPI's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while DOCN trades at $159.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 68.25. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check DOCN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while IOT trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1405.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check IOT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NLOK's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PAYP trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PAYP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while TOST trades at $22.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check TOST's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while OKTA trades at $77.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check OKTA's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while GEN trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check GEN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while RBRK trades at $59.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -33.97. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check RBRK's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CHKP trades at $114.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CHKP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NTNX trades at $44.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 48.26. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NTNX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while GDDY trades at $84.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check GDDY's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CFLT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ALTR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PLAN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check INFA's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CORZ trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CORZ's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CORZZ trades at $24.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CORZZ's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check HCP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check JCOM's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while DOX trades at $60.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check DOX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while DBX trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check DBX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SAIL trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SAIL's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SQSP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while BLSH trades at $41.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check BLSH's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NEWR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CCCS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PATH trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PATH's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while KLAR trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check KLAR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while S trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas S's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check S's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CORZW trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CORZW's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while RELY trades at $23.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 49.71. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check RELY's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NVEI's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while WEX trades at $135.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check WEX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while KVYO trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -481.67. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check KVYO's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ACIW trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ACIW's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while WIX trades at $57.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 86.23. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check WIX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ESMT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FOUR trades at $40.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FOUR's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while DLO trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check DLO's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while BB trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 69.11. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check BB's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while BOX trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check BOX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while VRNS trades at $27.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check VRNS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SWI's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CLBT trades at $12.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CLBT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while QLYS trades at $86.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check QLYS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check EVOP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while TDC trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check TDC's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PAGS trades at $8.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PAGS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while STNE trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check STNE's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while NTCT trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check NTCT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while EEFT trades at $69.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check EEFT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CCC trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 75.33. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CCC's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while WRD trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check WRD's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while TENB trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -210.10. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check TENB's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check CSGS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while AVPT trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check AVPT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check AVDX's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check GETVV's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ATEN trades at $27.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ATEN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FORG's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SPSC trades at $49.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SPSC's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check GSKY's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while RAMP trades at $28.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check RAMP's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while EVCM trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 77.77. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check EVCM's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check GET's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while MQ trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 399.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check MQ's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check STER's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while FIVN trades at $21.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check FIVN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while PICS trades at $11.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check PICS's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while BAND trades at $51.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -130.11. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check BAND's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while RXT trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check RXT's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check ZUO's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while APPN trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 1026.00. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check APPN's competition here

PAYO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PAYO stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAYO is priced at $4.92, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PAYO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.60, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PAYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PAYO is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAYO.Check SUMO's competition here