CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | $80.69 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 36.02 | $2.24 | +1.61% |
| MSFT | $384.93 | -1.55% | 2.9T | 23.78 | $16.19 | +0.92% |
| ORCL | $127.96 | -2.72% | 368.6B | 16.77 | $7.63 | +1.55% |
| PLTR | $133.72 | +2.83% | 307B | 140.76 | $0.95 | N/A |
| PANW | $352.89 | +6.84% | 240.5B | 93.85 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $210.73 | +12.14% | 214.6B | 205.09 | $1.03 | N/A |
| FTNT | $166.83 | +5.92% | 117.7B | 53.36 | $3.01 | N/A |
| NET | $281.75 | +4.53% | 100B | 278.93 | $1.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $425.90 | -1.83% | 81.5B | 31.75 | $13.41 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSGS vs MSFT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while MSFT trades at $384.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check MSFT's competition here
CSGS vs ORCL Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 368.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ORCL trades at $127.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ORCL's competition here
CSGS vs PLTR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 307B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PLTR trades at $133.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 140.76. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PLTR's competition here
CSGS vs PANW Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 240.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PANW trades at $352.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 93.85. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PANW's competition here
CSGS vs CRWD Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CRWD trades at $210.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 205.09. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CRWD's competition here
CSGS vs FTNT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while FTNT trades at $166.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check FTNT's competition here
CSGS vs NET Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NET trades at $281.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 278.93. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NET's competition here
CSGS vs SNPS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SNPS trades at $425.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SNPS's competition here
CSGS vs VMW Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check VMW's competition here
CSGS vs SQ Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SQ's competition here
CSGS vs XYZ Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while XYZ trades at $79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check XYZ's competition here
CSGS vs CRWV Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CRWV trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -39.61. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CRWV's competition here
CSGS vs TWLO Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while TWLO trades at $217.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check TWLO's competition here
CSGS vs AFRM Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while AFRM trades at $84.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 76.77. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check AFRM's competition here
CSGS vs NETE Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NETE's competition here
CSGS vs MDB Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while MDB trades at $344.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 65.16. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check MDB's competition here
CSGS vs SPLK Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS and SPLK have similar daily volatility (0.04).Check SPLK's competition here
CSGS vs OKTA Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while OKTA trades at $154.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check OKTA's competition here
CSGS vs ZS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ZS trades at $152.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ZS's competition here
CSGS vs VRSN Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while VRSN trades at $268.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check VRSN's competition here
CSGS vs FFIV Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while FFIV trades at $431.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check FFIV's competition here
CSGS vs CPAY Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CPAY trades at $356.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CPAY's competition here
CSGS vs FLT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check FLT's competition here
CSGS vs IOT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while IOT trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 59.52. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check IOT's competition here
CSGS vs CYBR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CYBR's competition here
CSGS vs AKAM Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while AKAM trades at $126.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check AKAM's competition here
CSGS vs RBRK Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while RBRK trades at $88.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 326.15. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check RBRK's competition here
CSGS vs TOST Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while TOST trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check TOST's competition here
CSGS vs KSPI Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while KSPI trades at $89.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check KSPI's competition here
CSGS vs GEN Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GEN trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GEN's competition here
CSGS vs GENVR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GENVR trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GENVR's competition here
CSGS vs NTNX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NTNX trades at $55.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NTNX's competition here
CSGS vs NLOK Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NLOK's competition here
CSGS vs CHKP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CHKP trades at $137.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CHKP's competition here
CSGS vs DOCN Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while DOCN trades at $126.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 70.14. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check DOCN's competition here
CSGS vs GDDY Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GDDY trades at $91.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GDDY's competition here
CSGS vs CFLT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CFLT's competition here
CSGS vs PAYP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PAYP trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PAYP's competition here
CSGS vs ALTR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ALTR's competition here
CSGS vs PLAN Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PLAN's competition here
CSGS vs SAIL Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SAIL trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SAIL's competition here
CSGS vs DBX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while DBX trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check DBX's competition here
CSGS vs INFA Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check INFA's competition here
CSGS vs KLAR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while KLAR trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -51.63. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check KLAR's competition here
CSGS vs HCP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check HCP's competition here
CSGS vs CORZ Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CORZ trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -24.82. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CORZ's competition here
CSGS vs CORZW Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CORZW trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CORZW's competition here
CSGS vs CORZZ Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CORZZ trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CORZZ's competition here
CSGS vs JCOM Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check JCOM's competition here
CSGS vs S Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while S trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas S's P/E ratio is 90.45. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check S's competition here
CSGS vs SQSP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SQSP's competition here
CSGS vs BB Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while BB trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 57.95. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check BB's competition here
CSGS vs PATH Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PATH trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PATH's competition here
CSGS vs NEWR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NEWR's competition here
CSGS vs QLYS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while QLYS trades at $164.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check QLYS's competition here
CSGS vs VRNS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while VRNS trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 209.52. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check VRNS's competition here
CSGS vs CCCS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CCCS's competition here
CSGS vs ACIW Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ACIW trades at $55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ACIW's competition here
CSGS vs DOX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while DOX trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check DOX's competition here
CSGS vs WEX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while WEX trades at $155.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check WEX's competition here
CSGS vs KVYO Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while KVYO trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check KVYO's competition here
CSGS vs RELY Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while RELY trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 47.04. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check RELY's competition here
CSGS vs NVEI Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NVEI's competition here
CSGS vs TENB Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while TENB trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check TENB's competition here
CSGS vs FOUR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while FOUR trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check FOUR's competition here
CSGS vs CLBT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CLBT trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CLBT's competition here
CSGS vs ESMT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ESMT's competition here
CSGS vs CCC Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while CCC trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check CCC's competition here
CSGS vs SWI Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SWI's competition here
CSGS vs NTCT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while NTCT trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check NTCT's competition here
CSGS vs EVOP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check EVOP's competition here
CSGS vs TDC Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while TDC trades at $31.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check TDC's competition here
CSGS vs EEFT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while EEFT trades at $77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check EEFT's competition here
CSGS vs WIX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while WIX trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check WIX's competition here
CSGS vs AVPT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while AVPT trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check AVPT's competition here
CSGS vs ATEN Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ATEN trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ATEN's competition here
CSGS vs BAND Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while BAND trades at $75.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 51.54. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check BAND's competition here
CSGS vs PAYO Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PAYO trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PAYO's competition here
CSGS vs SPSC Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SPSC trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SPSC's competition here
CSGS vs RAMP Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while RAMP trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check RAMP's competition here
CSGS vs AVDX Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check AVDX's competition here
CSGS vs GETVV Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GETVV's competition here
CSGS vs FORG Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check FORG's competition here
CSGS vs EVCM Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while EVCM trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check EVCM's competition here
CSGS vs GSKY Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GSKY's competition here
CSGS vs WRD Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while WRD trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check WRD's competition here
CSGS vs EVTC Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while EVTC trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check EVTC's competition here
CSGS vs GET Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GET's competition here
CSGS vs STER Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check STER's competition here
CSGS vs MQ Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while MQ trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -118.95. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check MQ's competition here
CSGS vs ZUO Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check ZUO's competition here
CSGS vs PGY Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PGY trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PGY's competition here
CSGS vs SUMO Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check SUMO's competition here
CSGS vs GB Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GB's competition here
CSGS vs PICS Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PICS trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PICS's competition here
CSGS vs BASE Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check BASE's competition here
CSGS vs RDWR Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while RDWR trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check RDWR's competition here
CSGS vs GCT Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while GCT trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check GCT's competition here
CSGS vs PAYA Comparison July 2026
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $80.69, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 36.02, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.Check PAYA's competition here