Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $464.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check MSFT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 374.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $129.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ORCL's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 282.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $123.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 129.56. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PLTR's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 270.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $331.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 88.25. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PANW's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 194.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $190.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 185.75. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CRWD's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $161.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FTNT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $278.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 276.22. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NET's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $388.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SNPS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check VMW's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SQ's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $81.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check XYZ's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $190.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -95.68. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NBIS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $71.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -35.57. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CRWV's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $197.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check TWLO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NETE's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $337.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check MDB's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SPLK's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $290.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check VRSN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $1,122.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FICO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $382.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CPAY's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $151.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ZS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $141.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check OKTA's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $402.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FFIV's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FLT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 60.08. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check IOT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CYBR's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check TOST's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $88.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check KSPI's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $115.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check AKAM's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $27.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GEN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $59.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NTNX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $72.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 267.85. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check RBRK's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NLOK's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $117.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 65.29. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check DOCN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $127.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CHKP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $82.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GDDY's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PAYP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ALTR's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PLAN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SAIL's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check DBX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to INFA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check INFA's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check HCP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PATH's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check JCOM's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CORZ's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CORZZ's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CORZW's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SQSP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas S's P/E ratio is 86.64. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check S's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $186.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check WEX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NEWR's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $20.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check MBGL's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $55.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check DOX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $57.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ACIW's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CCCS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $144.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check QLYS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NTSK's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check BB's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NVEI's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FOUR's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $22.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check RELY's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 173.70. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check VRNS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check DLO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $31.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check BOX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ESMT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CLBT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $32.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check TENB's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SWI's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check EVOP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $40.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check NTCT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check TDC's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check AVPT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $71.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check EEFT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PAYO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check RAMP's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check CSGS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $29.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ATEN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check AVDX's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GETVV's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check APPN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check FORG's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GSKY's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while EVTC trades at $30.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check EVTC's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GET's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PICS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $17.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -128.02. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check MQ's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $40.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PRGS's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check STER's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $43.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GCT's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while BRUN trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check BRUN's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PGY's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check ZUO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check SUMO's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check GB's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PGYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PGYWW's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is similarly volatile compared to BASE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check BASE's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while PAYA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check PAYA's competition here

Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CFLT stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFLT is priced at $30.99 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CFLT currently has a P/E ratio of -36.03, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, CFLT's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFLT is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFLT.Check BAND's competition here