Marqeta, Inc.
Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MQ | $4.31 | +0.47% | 1.9B | -143.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| MSFT | $424.62 | +2.13% | 3.2T | 26.59 | $15.97 | +0.82% |
| ORCL | $173.28 | -1.70% | 498.4B | 31.11 | $5.57 | +1.15% |
| PLTR | $143.09 | +1.07% | 327.9B | 227.13 | $0.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $178.54 | +3.08% | 121.7B | 99.76 | $1.79 | N/A |
| CRWD | $448.13 | +0.62% | 113.7B | -711.32 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| ADBE | $245.44 | +2.70% | 100.1B | 14.30 | $17.16 | N/A |
| SNPS | $500.82 | +9.62% | 96B | 76.59 | $6.54 | N/A |
| NET | $207.07 | +1.01% | 72.9B | -714.07 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| FTNT | $84.34 | +1.91% | 62.7B | 34.86 | $2.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MQ vs MSFT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while MSFT trades at $424.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check MSFT's competition here
MQ vs ORCL Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 498.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ORCL trades at $173.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ORCL's competition here
MQ vs PLTR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 327.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PLTR trades at $143.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 227.13. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PLTR's competition here
MQ vs PANW Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PANW trades at $178.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 99.76. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PANW's competition here
MQ vs CRWD Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CRWD trades at $448.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -711.32. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CRWD's competition here
MQ vs ADBE Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ADBE trades at $245.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ADBE's competition here
MQ vs SNPS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SNPS trades at $500.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 76.59. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SNPS's competition here
MQ vs NET Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NET trades at $207.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -714.07. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NET's competition here
MQ vs FTNT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while FTNT trades at $84.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FTNT's competition here
MQ vs VMW Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check VMW's competition here
MQ vs CRWV Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CRWV trades at $110.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -39.20. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CRWV's competition here
MQ vs SQ Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SQ's competition here
MQ vs XYZ Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while XYZ trades at $71.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check XYZ's competition here
MQ vs NETE Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NETE's competition here
MQ vs SPLK Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SPLK's competition here
MQ vs VRSN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while VRSN trades at $269.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check VRSN's competition here
MQ vs FLT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FLT's competition here
MQ vs ZS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ZS trades at $135.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -315.12. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ZS's competition here
MQ vs CPAY Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CPAY trades at $312.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CPAY's competition here
MQ vs AFRM Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while AFRM trades at $63.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 78.69. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AFRM's competition here
MQ vs CYBR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CYBR's competition here
MQ vs MDB Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while MDB trades at $253.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -291.48. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check MDB's competition here
MQ vs IOT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while IOT trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1497.75. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check IOT's competition here
MQ vs FFIV Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while FFIV trades at $303.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FFIV's competition here
MQ vs TOST Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while TOST trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TOST's competition here
MQ vs KSPI Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while KSPI trades at $85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KSPI's competition here
MQ vs NLOK Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NLOK's competition here
MQ vs CHKP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CHKP trades at $134.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CHKP's competition here
MQ vs AKAM Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while AKAM trades at $95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AKAM's competition here
MQ vs PAYP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PAYP trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAYP's competition here
MQ vs OKTA Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while OKTA trades at $75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check OKTA's competition here
MQ vs GEN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GEN trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GEN's competition here
MQ vs GDDY Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GDDY trades at $86.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GDDY's competition here
MQ vs CFLT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CFLT's competition here
MQ vs NTNX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NTNX trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NTNX's competition here
MQ vs RBRK Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while RBRK trades at $52.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -29.35. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RBRK's competition here
MQ vs DOCN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while DOCN trades at $95.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DOCN's competition here
MQ vs ALTR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ALTR's competition here
MQ vs PLAN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PLAN's competition here
MQ vs INFA Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check INFA's competition here
MQ vs HCP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check HCP's competition here
MQ vs DOX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while DOX trades at $65.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DOX's competition here
MQ vs JCOM Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check JCOM's competition here
MQ vs SAIL Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SAIL trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SAIL's competition here
MQ vs CORZ Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CORZ trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -23.72. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZ's competition here
MQ vs CORZZ Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CORZZ trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZZ's competition here
MQ vs SQSP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SQSP's competition here
MQ vs DBX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while DBX trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DBX's competition here
MQ vs NEWR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NEWR's competition here
MQ vs BLSH Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while BLSH trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BLSH's competition here
MQ vs KVYO Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while KVYO trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -176.86. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KVYO's competition here
MQ vs CCCS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CCCS's competition here
MQ vs PATH Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PATH trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PATH's competition here
MQ vs KLAR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while KLAR trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -17.78. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KLAR's competition here
MQ vs WEX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while WEX trades at $150.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WEX's competition here
MQ vs NVEI Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NVEI's competition here
MQ vs S Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while S trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check S's competition here
MQ vs FOUR Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while FOUR trades at $45.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FOUR's competition here
MQ vs CORZW Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CORZW trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZW's competition here
MQ vs ACIW Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ACIW trades at $43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ACIW's competition here
MQ vs RELY Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while RELY trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RELY's competition here
MQ vs WIX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while WIX trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 85.99. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WIX's competition here
MQ vs DLO Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while DLO trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DLO's competition here
MQ vs ESMT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ESMT's competition here
MQ vs BOX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while BOX trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BOX's competition here
MQ vs STNE Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while STNE trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check STNE's competition here
MQ vs SWI Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SWI's competition here
MQ vs CLBT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CLBT trades at $12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CLBT's competition here
MQ vs EEFT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while EEFT trades at $74.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EEFT's competition here
MQ vs PAGS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PAGS trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAGS's competition here
MQ vs QLYS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while QLYS trades at $84.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check QLYS's competition here
MQ vs CCC Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CCC trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -498.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CCC's competition here
MQ vs BB Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while BB trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BB's competition here
MQ vs EVOP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EVOP's competition here
MQ vs VRNS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while VRNS trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check VRNS's competition here
MQ vs WRD Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while WRD trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WRD's competition here
MQ vs TDC Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while TDC trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TDC's competition here
MQ vs NTCT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while NTCT trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NTCT's competition here
MQ vs TENB Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while TENB trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -66.73. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TENB's competition here
MQ vs CSGS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while CSGS trades at $80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CSGS's competition here
MQ vs AVPT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while AVPT trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 65.80. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AVPT's competition here
MQ vs EVCM Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while EVCM trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EVCM's competition here
MQ vs AVDX Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AVDX's competition here
MQ vs GETVV Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GETVV's competition here
MQ vs SPSC Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SPSC trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SPSC's competition here
MQ vs ATEN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ATEN trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ATEN's competition here
MQ vs FORG Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FORG's competition here
MQ vs GSKY Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GSKY's competition here
MQ vs RAMP Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while RAMP trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RAMP's competition here
MQ vs EVTC Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while EVTC trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EVTC's competition here
MQ vs PAYO Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PAYO trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAYO's competition here
MQ vs GCT Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GCT trades at $46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GCT's competition here
MQ vs GET Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GET's competition here
MQ vs PICS Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while PICS trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PICS's competition here
MQ vs STER Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check STER's competition here
MQ vs APPN Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while APPN trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 1107.25. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check APPN's competition here
MQ vs ZUO Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ZUO's competition here
MQ vs SUMO Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SUMO's competition here
MQ vs GB Comparison April 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $4.31, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of -143.67, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GB's competition here