Marqeta, Inc.
Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MQ | $3.86 | -0.52% | 1.6B | 386.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| MSFT | $425.10 | +4.91% | 3T | 24.40 | $16.78 | +0.85% |
| ORCL | $194.15 | +2.31% | 562.8B | 35.07 | $5.58 | +1.02% |
| PLTR | $134.58 | +3.48% | 307B | 150.24 | $0.89 | N/A |
| PANW | $244.05 | +7.14% | 162.3B | 126.04 | $1.89 | N/A |
| CRWD | $592.94 | +5.40% | 147.1B | -878.71 | -$0.66 | N/A |
| SNPS | $499.20 | -1.98% | 97.7B | 78.22 | $6.52 | N/A |
| ADBE | $247.68 | +4.92% | 95.8B | 13.81 | $17.17 | N/A |
| FTNT | $122.52 | +4.10% | 89.3B | 47.23 | $2.58 | N/A |
| NET | $199.56 | +3.60% | 70.6B | -799.12 | -$0.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MQ vs MSFT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while MSFT trades at $425.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check MSFT's competition here
MQ vs ORCL Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 562.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ORCL trades at $194.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ORCL's competition here
MQ vs PLTR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 307B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PLTR trades at $134.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 150.24. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PLTR's competition here
MQ vs PANW Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 162.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PANW trades at $244.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 126.04. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PANW's competition here
MQ vs CRWD Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CRWD trades at $592.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -878.71. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CRWD's competition here
MQ vs SNPS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SNPS trades at $499.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 78.22. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SNPS's competition here
MQ vs ADBE Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ADBE trades at $247.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ADBE's competition here
MQ vs FTNT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FTNT trades at $122.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FTNT's competition here
MQ vs NET Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NET trades at $199.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -799.12. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NET's competition here
MQ vs CRWV Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CRWV trades at $107.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -41.99. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CRWV's competition here
MQ vs VMW Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check VMW's competition here
MQ vs SQ Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SQ's competition here
MQ vs XYZ Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while XYZ trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 55.88. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check XYZ's competition here
MQ vs NETE Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NETE's competition here
MQ vs VRSN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while VRSN trades at $295.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ and VRSN have similar daily volatility (1.68).Check VRSN's competition here
MQ vs SPLK Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SPLK's competition here
MQ vs ZS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ZS trades at $160.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -357.44. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ZS's competition here
MQ vs MDB Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while MDB trades at $311.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -344.42. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check MDB's competition here
MQ vs AKAM Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while AKAM trades at $150.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AKAM's competition here
MQ vs AFRM Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while AFRM trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AFRM's competition here
MQ vs FLT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FLT's competition here
MQ vs CPAY Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CPAY trades at $328.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CPAY's competition here
MQ vs CYBR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CYBR's competition here
MQ vs FFIV Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FFIV trades at $363.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FFIV's competition here
MQ vs KSPI Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while KSPI trades at $87.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KSPI's competition here
MQ vs DOCN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while DOCN trades at $154.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DOCN's competition here
MQ vs IOT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while IOT trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1399.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check IOT's competition here
MQ vs NLOK Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NLOK's competition here
MQ vs GEN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GEN trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GEN's competition here
MQ vs OKTA Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while OKTA trades at $82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 61.87. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check OKTA's competition here
MQ vs TOST Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while TOST trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TOST's competition here
MQ vs PAYP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PAYP trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAYP's competition here
MQ vs RBRK Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while RBRK trades at $63.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -35.28. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RBRK's competition here
MQ vs CHKP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CHKP trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CHKP's competition here
MQ vs NTNX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NTNX trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NTNX's competition here
MQ vs GDDY Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GDDY trades at $87.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GDDY's competition here
MQ vs CFLT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CFLT's competition here
MQ vs ALTR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ALTR's competition here
MQ vs PLAN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PLAN's competition here
MQ vs CORZ Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CORZ trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZ's competition here
MQ vs CORZZ Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CORZZ trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZZ's competition here
MQ vs INFA Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check INFA's competition here
MQ vs SAIL Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SAIL trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -24.39. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SAIL's competition here
MQ vs HCP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check HCP's competition here
MQ vs JCOM Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check JCOM's competition here
MQ vs DBX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while DBX trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DBX's competition here
MQ vs DOX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while DOX trades at $60.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DOX's competition here
MQ vs SQSP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SQSP's competition here
MQ vs KLAR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while KLAR trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -20.84. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KLAR's competition here
MQ vs NEWR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NEWR's competition here
MQ vs BLSH Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while BLSH trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BLSH's competition here
MQ vs CORZW Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CORZW trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CORZW's competition here
MQ vs CCCS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CCCS's competition here
MQ vs S Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while S trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas S's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check S's competition here
MQ vs PATH Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PATH trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PATH's competition here
MQ vs RELY Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while RELY trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 48.54. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RELY's competition here
MQ vs NVEI Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NVEI's competition here
MQ vs WEX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while WEX trades at $141.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WEX's competition here
MQ vs KVYO Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while KVYO trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -477.67. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check KVYO's competition here
MQ vs ACIW Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ACIW trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ACIW's competition here
MQ vs ESMT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ESMT's competition here
MQ vs FOUR Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FOUR trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FOUR's competition here
MQ vs DLO Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while DLO trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check DLO's competition here
MQ vs BB Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while BB trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 68.56. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BB's competition here
MQ vs BOX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while BOX trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BOX's competition here
MQ vs CLBT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CLBT trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CLBT's competition here
MQ vs SWI Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SWI's competition here
MQ vs VRNS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while VRNS trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -24.09. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check VRNS's competition here
MQ vs TDC Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while TDC trades at $33.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TDC's competition here
MQ vs QLYS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while QLYS trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check QLYS's competition here
MQ vs EVOP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EVOP's competition here
MQ vs WIX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while WIX trades at $53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 59.90. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WIX's competition here
MQ vs NTCT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while NTCT trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check NTCT's competition here
MQ vs PAGS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PAGS trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAGS's competition here
MQ vs STNE Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while STNE trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check STNE's competition here
MQ vs EEFT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while EEFT trades at $66.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EEFT's competition here
MQ vs CCC Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CCC trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CCC's competition here
MQ vs WRD Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while WRD trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check WRD's competition here
MQ vs CSGS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while CSGS trades at $79.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check CSGS's competition here
MQ vs TENB Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while TENB trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -204.40. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check TENB's competition here
MQ vs AVDX Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AVDX's competition here
MQ vs AVPT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while AVPT trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 48.95. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check AVPT's competition here
MQ vs GETVV Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GETVV's competition here
MQ vs ATEN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ATEN trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ATEN's competition here
MQ vs FORG Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FORG's competition here
MQ vs GSKY Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GSKY's competition here
MQ vs RAMP Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while RAMP trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RAMP's competition here
MQ vs SPSC Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SPSC trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SPSC's competition here
MQ vs RXT Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while RXT trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check RXT's competition here
MQ vs GET Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GET's competition here
MQ vs EVCM Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while EVCM trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 73.31. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check EVCM's competition here
MQ vs BAND Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while BAND trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -137.11. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check BAND's competition here
MQ vs STER Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check STER's competition here
MQ vs PAYO Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PAYO trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PAYO's competition here
MQ vs FIVN Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while FIVN trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check FIVN's competition here
MQ vs ZUO Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check ZUO's competition here
MQ vs PICS Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while PICS trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check PICS's competition here
MQ vs SUMO Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check SUMO's competition here
MQ vs GB Comparison May 2026
MQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MQ stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MQ is priced at $3.86, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MQ currently has a P/E ratio of 386.00, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, MQ's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MQ is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MQ.Check GB's competition here