Radware Ltd. (RDWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDWR | $29.41 | +4.51% | 1.3B | 24.92 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MSFT | $372.97 | +5.71% | 2.8T | 23.04 | $16.19 | +0.96% |
| ORCL | $148.68 | -2.48% | 428.4B | 19.49 | $7.63 | +1.34% |
| PLTR | $112.93 | +5.28% | 259.3B | 118.87 | $0.95 | N/A |
| PANW | $304.20 | +3.79% | 207.3B | 80.90 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $701.09 | +3.31% | 178.5B | 170.58 | $4.11 | N/A |
| FTNT | $151.35 | +0.95% | 110.8B | 50.24 | $3.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $454.34 | -0.15% | 87B | 33.88 | $13.41 | N/A |
| NET | $237.24 | +4.67% | 84.1B | 234.70 | $1.01 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDWR vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while MSFT trades at $372.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check MSFT's competition here
RDWR vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 428.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ORCL trades at $148.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ORCL's competition here
RDWR vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PLTR trades at $112.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 118.87. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PLTR's competition here
RDWR vs PANW Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PANW trades at $304.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 80.90. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PANW's competition here
RDWR vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CRWD trades at $701.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 170.58. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CRWD's competition here
RDWR vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while FTNT trades at $151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check FTNT's competition here
RDWR vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SNPS trades at $454.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 33.88. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SNPS's competition here
RDWR vs NET Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NET trades at $237.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 234.70. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NET's competition here
RDWR vs VMW Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check VMW's competition here
RDWR vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CRWV trades at $96.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.97. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CRWV's competition here
RDWR vs SQ Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SQ's competition here
RDWR vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while XYZ trades at $77.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check XYZ's competition here
RDWR vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while TWLO trades at $191.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check TWLO's competition here
RDWR vs NETE Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NETE's competition here
RDWR vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while AFRM trades at $79.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 72.26. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check AFRM's competition here
RDWR vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SPLK's competition here
RDWR vs MDB Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while MDB trades at $314.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check MDB's competition here
RDWR vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while VRSN trades at $255.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check VRSN's competition here
RDWR vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while FFIV trades at $394.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check FFIV's competition here
RDWR vs FLT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check FLT's competition here
RDWR vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CPAY trades at $332.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CPAY's competition here
RDWR vs ZS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ZS trades at $132.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ZS's competition here
RDWR vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while OKTA trades at $124.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check OKTA's competition here
RDWR vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CYBR's competition here
RDWR vs IOT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while IOT trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check IOT's competition here
RDWR vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while KSPI trades at $88.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check KSPI's competition here
RDWR vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while AKAM trades at $113.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check AKAM's competition here
RDWR vs TOST Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while TOST trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check TOST's competition here
RDWR vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while RBRK trades at $72.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 267.96. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check RBRK's competition here
RDWR vs GEN Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GEN trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GEN's competition here
RDWR vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while DOCN trades at $139.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 77.47. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check DOCN's competition here
RDWR vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NLOK's competition here
RDWR vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CHKP trades at $130.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CHKP's competition here
RDWR vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NTNX trades at $49.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NTNX's competition here
RDWR vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GDDY trades at $84.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GDDY's competition here
RDWR vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CFLT's competition here
RDWR vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PAYP trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PAYP's competition here
RDWR vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ALTR's competition here
RDWR vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PLAN's competition here
RDWR vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CORZ trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -30.56. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CORZ's competition here
RDWR vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CORZW trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CORZW's competition here
RDWR vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CORZZ trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CORZZ's competition here
RDWR vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while KLAR trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -53.45. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check KLAR's competition here
RDWR vs INFA Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check INFA's competition here
RDWR vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SAIL trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 47.07. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SAIL's competition here
RDWR vs HCP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check HCP's competition here
RDWR vs DBX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while DBX trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check DBX's competition here
RDWR vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check JCOM's competition here
RDWR vs BB Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while BB trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 59.95. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check BB's competition here
RDWR vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SQSP's competition here
RDWR vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NEWR's competition here
RDWR vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CCCS's competition here
RDWR vs PATH Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PATH trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PATH's competition here
RDWR vs DOX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while DOX trades at $51.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check DOX's competition here
RDWR vs S Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while S trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas S's P/E ratio is 72.41. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check S's competition here
RDWR vs ACIW Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ACIW trades at $49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ACIW's competition here
RDWR vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NVEI's competition here
RDWR vs WEX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while WEX trades at $138.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check WEX's competition here
RDWR vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while VRNS trades at $40.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 175.22. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check VRNS's competition here
RDWR vs RELY Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while RELY trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check RELY's competition here
RDWR vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while KVYO trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check KVYO's competition here
RDWR vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while QLYS trades at $123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check QLYS's competition here
RDWR vs FOUR Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while FOUR trades at $47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check FOUR's competition here
RDWR vs ESMT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ESMT's competition here
RDWR vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CLBT trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CLBT's competition here
RDWR vs TENB Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while TENB trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check TENB's competition here
RDWR vs SWI Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SWI's competition here
RDWR vs TDC Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while TDC trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check TDC's competition here
RDWR vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check EVOP's competition here
RDWR vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while NTCT trades at $41.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check NTCT's competition here
RDWR vs CCC Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CCC trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CCC's competition here
RDWR vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while EEFT trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check EEFT's competition here
RDWR vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ATEN trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ATEN's competition here
RDWR vs WIX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while WIX trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check WIX's competition here
RDWR vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PAYO trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PAYO's competition here
RDWR vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while AVPT trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check AVPT's competition here
RDWR vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check CSGS's competition here
RDWR vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while RAMP trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check RAMP's competition here
RDWR vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SPSC trades at $58.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SPSC's competition here
RDWR vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check AVDX's competition here
RDWR vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GETVV's competition here
RDWR vs FORG Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check FORG's competition here
RDWR vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GSKY's competition here
RDWR vs BAND Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while BAND trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check BAND's competition here
RDWR vs MQ Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while MQ trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 774.07. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check MQ's competition here
RDWR vs GET Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GET's competition here
RDWR vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while EVTC trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check EVTC's competition here
RDWR vs WRD Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while WRD trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check WRD's competition here
RDWR vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while EVCM trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 71.62. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check EVCM's competition here
RDWR vs STER Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check STER's competition here
RDWR vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check ZUO's competition here
RDWR vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check SUMO's competition here
RDWR vs GB Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check GB's competition here
RDWR vs RXT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while RXT trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -33.22. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check RXT's competition here
RDWR vs PICS Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PICS trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PICS's competition here
RDWR vs BASE Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check BASE's competition here
RDWR vs PGY Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PGY trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PGY's competition here
RDWR vs PAYA Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check PAYA's competition here
RDWR vs VRNT Comparison June 2026
RDWR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWR stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRNT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWR is priced at $29.41, while VRNT trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWR currently has a P/E ratio of 24.92, whereas VRNT's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, RDWR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWR is more volatile compared to VRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWR.Check VRNT's competition here