FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. (FLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLT | $303.26 | -0.83% | 21.8B | 22.97 | $13.20 | N/A |
| MSFT | $426.69 | -7.35% | 3.3T | 26.25 | $16.81 | +0.81% |
| ORCL | $231.34 | -6.77% | 703.3B | 43.82 | $5.58 | +0.82% |
| PLTR | $145.08 | -9.69% | 349.4B | 170.98 | $0.89 | N/A |
| PANW | $281.64 | -6.27% | 202.5B | 165.06 | $1.80 | N/A |
| CRWD | $756.41 | -3.29% | 195.8B | -1165.24 | -$0.66 | N/A |
| FTNT | $147.56 | +0.29% | 109B | 57.69 | $2.58 | N/A |
| SNPS | $499.06 | +1.38% | 97.4B | 116.10 | $4.38 | N/A |
| NET | $263.58 | -2.67% | 96.4B | -1136.08 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| CRWV | $113.39 | -9.16% | 65.1B | -43.85 | -$2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLT vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MSFT trades at $426.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check MSFT's competition here
FLT vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 703.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ORCL trades at $231.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ORCL's competition here
FLT vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 349.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PLTR trades at $145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 170.98. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PLTR's competition here
FLT vs PANW Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 202.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PANW trades at $281.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 165.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PANW's competition here
FLT vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CRWD trades at $756.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -1165.24. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CRWD's competition here
FLT vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FTNT trades at $147.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check FTNT's competition here
FLT vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SNPS trades at $499.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 116.10. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SNPS's competition here
FLT vs NET Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NET trades at $263.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -1136.08. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NET's competition here
FLT vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CRWV trades at $113.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -43.85. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CRWV's competition here
FLT vs VMW Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check VMW's competition here
FLT vs SQ Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SQ's competition here
FLT vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while XYZ trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check XYZ's competition here
FLT vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TWLO trades at $218.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 342.45. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check TWLO's competition here
FLT vs MDB Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MDB trades at $370.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -1076.92. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check MDB's competition here
FLT vs NETE Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NETE's competition here
FLT vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VRSN trades at $298.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check VRSN's competition here
FLT vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SPLK's competition here
FLT vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AFRM trades at $66.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check AFRM's competition here
FLT vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CPAY trades at $340.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CPAY's competition here
FLT vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AKAM trades at $163.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check AKAM's competition here
FLT vs ZS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ZS trades at $136.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -300.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ZS's competition here
FLT vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FFIV trades at $408.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check FFIV's competition here
FLT vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while OKTA trades at $125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 98.05. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check OKTA's competition here
FLT vs IOT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while IOT trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1868.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check IOT's competition here
FLT vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CYBR's competition here
FLT vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DOCN trades at $178.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check DOCN's competition here
FLT vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while KSPI trades at $87.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check KSPI's competition here
FLT vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RBRK trades at $79.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -46.24. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check RBRK's competition here
FLT vs GEN Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GEN trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GEN's competition here
FLT vs TOST Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TOST trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 39.34. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check TOST's competition here
FLT vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NTNX trades at $53.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NTNX's competition here
FLT vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CHKP trades at $137.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CHKP's competition here
FLT vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NLOK's competition here
FLT vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAYP trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PAYP's competition here
FLT vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GDDY trades at $85.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GDDY's competition here
FLT vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SAIL trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -36.72. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SAIL's competition here
FLT vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CFLT's competition here
FLT vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ALTR's competition here
FLT vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PLAN's competition here
FLT vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZ trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CORZ's competition here
FLT vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZZ trades at $29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CORZZ's competition here
FLT vs INFA Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check INFA's competition here
FLT vs DBX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DBX trades at $27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check DBX's competition here
FLT vs HCP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check HCP's competition here
FLT vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZW trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CORZW's competition here
FLT vs DOX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DOX trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check DOX's competition here
FLT vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check JCOM's competition here
FLT vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while KLAR trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check KLAR's competition here
FLT vs PATH Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PATH trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PATH's competition here
FLT vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SQSP's competition here
FLT vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NEWR's competition here
FLT vs BB Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while BB trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 114.61. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check BB's competition here
FLT vs S Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while S trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas S's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check S's competition here
FLT vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CCCS's competition here
FLT vs WEX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while WEX trades at $144.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check WEX's competition here
FLT vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while KVYO trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -564.67. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check KVYO's competition here
FLT vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NVEI's competition here
FLT vs BLSH Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while BLSH trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check BLSH's competition here
FLT vs ACIW Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ACIW trades at $41.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ACIW's competition here
FLT vs RELY Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RELY trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check RELY's competition here
FLT vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VRNS trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check VRNS's competition here
FLT vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while QLYS trades at $110.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check QLYS's competition here
FLT vs FOUR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FOUR trades at $40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 49.72. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check FOUR's competition here
FLT vs ESMT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ESMT's competition here
FLT vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CLBT trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 53.46. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CLBT's competition here
FLT vs DLO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DLO trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check DLO's competition here
FLT vs TDC Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TDC trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check TDC's competition here
FLT vs TENB Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TENB trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -309.10. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check TENB's competition here
FLT vs SWI Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SWI's competition here
FLT vs WIX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while WIX trades at $56.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is -79.36. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check WIX's competition here
FLT vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NTCT trades at $42.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check NTCT's competition here
FLT vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check EVOP's competition here
FLT vs CCC Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CCC trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 83.25. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CCC's competition here
FLT vs STNE Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while STNE trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check STNE's competition here
FLT vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EEFT trades at $69.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check EEFT's competition here
FLT vs PAGS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAGS trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PAGS's competition here
FLT vs WRD Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while WRD trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check WRD's competition here
FLT vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AVPT trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 56.45. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check AVPT's competition here
FLT vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ATEN trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ATEN's competition here
FLT vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check CSGS's competition here
FLT vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RAMP trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check RAMP's competition here
FLT vs BAND Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while BAND trades at $65.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -178.61. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check BAND's competition here
FLT vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SPSC trades at $55.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SPSC's competition here
FLT vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check AVDX's competition here
FLT vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GETVV's competition here
FLT vs FORG Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check FORG's competition here
FLT vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GSKY's competition here
FLT vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVCM trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 78.69. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check EVCM's competition here
FLT vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAYO trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PAYO's competition here
FLT vs GENVR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GENVR trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GENVR's competition here
FLT vs GET Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GET's competition here
FLT vs MQ Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MQ trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 410.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check MQ's competition here
FLT vs STER Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check STER's competition here
FLT vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check ZUO's competition here
FLT vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVTC trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check EVTC's competition here
FLT vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check SUMO's competition here
FLT vs GB Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check GB's competition here
FLT vs PICS Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PICS trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check PICS's competition here
FLT vs RDWR Comparison June 2026
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.8B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RDWR trades at $30.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 71.70. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.Check RDWR's competition here