Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTSK | $8.81 | -2.54% | 3.6B | -4.95 | -$1.78 | N/A |
| VRSK | $180.46 | -1.82% | 23.6B | 27.51 | $6.56 | +1.01% |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ZSQR | $12.77 | +16.89% | 79.5M | -4.54 | -$2.81 | N/A |
| GIFT | $0.97 | +5.52% | 33.1M | -3.03 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| ZTG | $1.73 | +1.76% | 20.4M | 17.30 | $0.10 | N/A |
| QCLS | $4.07 | +5.17% | 7.2M | -0.48 | -$8.49 | N/A |
| RPGL | $2.32 | +0.04% | 2.5K | 0.45 | $5.19 | N/A |
| DST | $83.99 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +0.64% |
| IMPV | $55.74 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTSK vs VRSK Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while VRSK trades at $180.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check VRSK's competition here
NTSK vs TCGL Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TCGL's competition here
NTSK vs ZSQR Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while ZSQR trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZSQR's competition here
NTSK vs GIFT Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while GIFT trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check GIFT's competition here
NTSK vs ZTG Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while ZTG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZTG's competition here
NTSK vs QCLS Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while QCLS trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check QCLS's competition here
NTSK vs RPGL Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while RPGL trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RPGL's competition here
NTSK vs DST Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DST's competition here
NTSK vs IMPV Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check IMPV's competition here
NTSK vs HDP Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check HDP's competition here
NTSK vs DWRE Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWRE's competition here
NTSK vs CRTN Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CRTN's competition here
NTSK vs CALD Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CALD's competition here
NTSK vs CSC Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CSC's competition here
NTSK vs RMGN Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RMGN's competition here
NTSK vs CRA Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 8.54 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
NTSK vs PRGY Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 8.54 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
NTSK vs FUEL Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check FUEL's competition here
NTSK vs DWCH Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWCH's competition here
NTSK vs ACTA Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ACTA's competition here
NTSK vs XTLY Comparison June 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.81, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.95, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check XTLY's competition here