Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTSK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTSK | $11.68 | -4.38% | 4.9B | -13.10 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| VRSK | $190.24 | +1.30% | 25.2B | 26.55 | $7.24 | +0.98% |
| CART | $46.73 | -1.31% | 11.3B | 23.80 | $2.02 | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| KC | $10.61 | +16.22% | 2.8B | -32.55 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| KEEL | $4.48 | -7.54% | 2.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TRVG | $5.29 | +0.38% | 371M | 52.60 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TRUE | $2.54 | +14.93% | 225.9M | -12.10 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AHG | $1.50 | -1.63% | 147.8M | -7.31 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| FIRY | $9.16 | -3.27% | 143.4M | -2.29 | -$4.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTSK vs VRSK Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while VRSK trades at $190.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check VRSK's competition here
NTSK vs CART Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CART trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CART's competition here
NTSK vs TCGL Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TCGL's competition here
NTSK vs KC Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while KC trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -32.55. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check KC's competition here
NTSK vs KEEL Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while KEEL trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check KEEL's competition here
NTSK vs TRVG Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 371M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while TRVG trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TRVG's competition here
NTSK vs TRUE Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TRUE's competition here
NTSK vs AHG Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while AHG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check AHG's competition here
NTSK vs FIRY Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FIRY has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while FIRY trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas FIRY's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to FIRY's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to FIRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check FIRY's competition here
NTSK vs AIB Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AIB has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while AIB trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas AIB's P/E ratio is -178.00. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to AIB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to AIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check AIB's competition here
NTSK vs ROC Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ROC has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while ROC trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas ROC's P/E ratio is -18.81. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ROC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ROC's competition here
NTSK vs RSSS Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RSSS has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while RSSS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas RSSS's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RSSS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to RSSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RSSS's competition here
NTSK vs IZEA Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while IZEA trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -118.67. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check IZEA's competition here
NTSK vs ZSQR Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while ZSQR trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZSQR's competition here
NTSK vs GIFT Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while GIFT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check GIFT's competition here
NTSK vs ZGM Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while ZGM trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZGM's competition here
NTSK vs ZTG Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while ZTG trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZTG's competition here
NTSK vs SST Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while SST trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check SST's competition here
NTSK vs HOLO Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while HOLO trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check HOLO's competition here
NTSK vs AGAE Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while AGAE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check AGAE's competition here
NTSK vs TGHL Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TGHL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while TGHL trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas TGHL's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TGHL's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to TGHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TGHL's competition here
NTSK vs CHAI Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CHAI has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CHAI trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CHAI's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CHAI's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to CHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CHAI's competition here
NTSK vs QCLS Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while QCLS trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check QCLS's competition here
NTSK vs CALD Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is -115.41. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CALD's competition here
NTSK vs XTLY Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check XTLY's competition here
NTSK vs ACTA Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ACTA's competition here
NTSK vs CSC Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CSC's competition here
NTSK vs DWCH Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWCH's competition here
NTSK vs HDP Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check HDP's competition here
NTSK vs MBGL Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while MBGL trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to MBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check MBGL's competition here
NTSK vs DWRE Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is -61.74. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWRE's competition here
NTSK vs CRA Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 6.43 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
NTSK vs DST Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DST's competition here
NTSK vs FUEL Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check FUEL's competition here
NTSK vs IMPV Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is -68.74. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check IMPV's competition here
NTSK vs PRGY Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 6.43 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
NTSK vs RMGN Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RMGN's competition here
NTSK vs CRTN Comparison July 2026
NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $11.68, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -13.10, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CRTN's competition here