Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $464.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check MSFT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 374.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $129.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ORCL's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 282.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $123.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 129.56. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PLTR's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 194.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $190.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 185.75. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CRWD's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $161.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FTNT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $278.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 276.22. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NET's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $388.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SNPS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check VMW's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SQ's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $81.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check XYZ's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $190.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -95.68. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NBIS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $71.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -35.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CRWV's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $197.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check TWLO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NETE's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $337.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check MDB's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SPLK's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $290.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check VRSN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $1,122.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FICO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $382.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CPAY's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $151.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ZS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $141.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check OKTA's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $402.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FFIV's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FLT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 60.08. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check IOT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CYBR's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check TOST's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $88.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check KSPI's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $115.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check AKAM's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $27.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GEN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $59.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NTNX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $72.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 267.85. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check RBRK's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NLOK's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $117.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 65.29. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check DOCN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $127.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CHKP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CFLT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $82.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GDDY's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PAYP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ALTR's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PLAN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SAIL's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check DBX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check INFA's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check HCP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PATH's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check JCOM's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CORZ's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CORZZ's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CORZW's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SQSP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas S's P/E ratio is 86.64. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check S's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $186.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check WEX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NEWR's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $20.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check MBGL's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $55.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check DOX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $57.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ACIW's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CCCS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $144.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check QLYS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NTSK's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check BB's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NVEI's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FOUR's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $22.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check RELY's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 173.70. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check VRNS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check DLO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $31.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check BOX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ESMT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CLBT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $32.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check TENB's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SWI's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check EVOP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $40.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check NTCT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check TDC's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check AVPT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $71.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check EEFT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PAYO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check RAMP's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check CSGS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $29.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ATEN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check AVDX's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GETVV's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check APPN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check FORG's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GSKY's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while EVTC trades at $30.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check EVTC's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GET's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PICS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $17.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -128.02. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check MQ's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $40.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PRGS's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check STER's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $43.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GCT's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while BRUN trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check BRUN's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PGY's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check ZUO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check SUMO's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check GB's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PGYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PGYWW's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check BASE's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while PAYA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check PAYA's competition here

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 270.4B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $331.83 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 88.25, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.Check BAND's competition here