F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $517.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MSFT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 433.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $188.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 157.29. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PLTR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 410.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $142.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ORCL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 328.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $403.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.24. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PANW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 275B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $270.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 262.81. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CRWD's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $180.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 60.12. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FTNT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $349.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 345.50. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NET's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $489.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SNPS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VMW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SQ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $89.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -44.41. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CRWV's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $294.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 55.85. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TWLO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $74.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check XYZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $211.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 59.72. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check OKTA's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $196.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 49.90. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ZS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $357.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 67.67. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MDB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NETE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SPLK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $288.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VRSN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $394.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CPAY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $118.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 439.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RBRK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $41.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 66.31. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check IOT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FLT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CYBR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTNX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $94.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check KSPI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TOST's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $140.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 84.37. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DOCN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $108.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AKAM's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NLOK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $130.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CHKP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GEN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $97.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GDDY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $20.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 72.96. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SAIL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CFLT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAYP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ALTR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PLAN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DBX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas S's P/E ratio is 113.86. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check S's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check INFA's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTSK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check HCP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PATH's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $193.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check QLYS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check JCOM's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SQSP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $58.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DOX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NEWR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $169.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check WEX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GENVR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CCCS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $47.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 206.83. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VRNS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 48.87. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $50.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ACIW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $17.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 40.98. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MBGL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NVEI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $34.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BOX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RELY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $36.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TENB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DLO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ESMT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $30.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FOUR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SWI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check EVOP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $14.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AVPT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $40.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTCT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $30.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TDC's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $11.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 47.63. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CLBT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $36.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 42.16. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check APPN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAYO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $63.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check EEFT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check STNE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CSGS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RAMP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AVDX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GETVV's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $63.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BAND's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $53.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GCT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $27.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ATEN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FORG's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $13.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GSKY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 232.23. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NYAX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GET's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check STER's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $16.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 170.27. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MQ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ZUO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $36.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PRGS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PGY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SUMO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BASE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while BRUN trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -34.40. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BRUN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $454.04 on the NASDAQ, while RDWR trades at $30.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 26.87, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RDWR's competition here