Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $524.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check MSFT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 451.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $196.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 163.49. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PLTR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 381.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $126.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ORCL's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $380.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 101.21. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PANW's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $257.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 250.68. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CRWD's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $179.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check FTNT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $325.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 322.58. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NET's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $430.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SNPS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check VMW's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SQ's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $76.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check XYZ's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $255.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 64.76. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ZS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $261.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check TWLO's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $213.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check OKTA's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $54.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CRWV's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $371.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check MDB's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NETE's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $300.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check VRSN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $408.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CPAY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $128.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 476.59. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check RBRK's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SPLK's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check IOT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $455.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check FFIV's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check FLT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CYBR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $70.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NTNX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $91.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check KSPI's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check TOST's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $159.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CHKP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GEN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GENVR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NLOK's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $112.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GDDY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 77.82. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SAIL's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CFLT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $93.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check DOCN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PAYP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NTSK's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ALTR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PLAN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $37.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check DBX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas S's P/E ratio is 109.05. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check S's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check INFA's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $216.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check QLYS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PATH's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check HCP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check JCOM's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $62.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check DOX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $197.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check WEX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SQSP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NEWR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $43.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check BOX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $55.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ACIW's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CCCS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $48.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 212.52. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check VRNS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check MBGL's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $24.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check RELY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check BB's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $44.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check TENB's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NVEI's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check DLO's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CORZW's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CORZZ's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CORZ's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PAY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $38.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check FOUR's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ESMT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check APPN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check AVPT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $34.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check TDC's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SWI's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CLBT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check EVOP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $39.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NTCT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check STNE's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $65.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check EEFT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PAYO's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $38.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check RAMP's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check CSGS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $58.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GCT's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check AVDX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GETVV's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check FORG's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $46.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PRGS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GSKY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ATEN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $48.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 229.72. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NYAX's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 193.93. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check MQ's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PICS's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GET's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check STER's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check PGY's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check ZUO's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check SUMO's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check GB's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check NN's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check BASE's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $44.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check BAND's competition here

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AKAM stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKAM is priced at $93.53 on the NASDAQ, while RDWR trades at $31.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AKAM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.29, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, AKAM's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKAM is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKAM.Check RDWR's competition here