ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $524.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MSFT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 451.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $196.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 163.49. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PLTR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 381.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $126.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ORCL's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $380.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 101.21. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PANW's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 263.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $257.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 250.68. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CRWD's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $179.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 59.80. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FTNT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $325.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 322.58. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NET's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $430.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SNPS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VMW's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SQ's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $76.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check XYZ's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $255.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 64.76. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ZS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $261.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TWLO's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $213.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check OKTA's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $54.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CRWV's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $371.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MDB's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NETE's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $300.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VRSN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $408.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CPAY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $128.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 476.59. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RBRK's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SPLK's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check IOT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $455.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FFIV's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FLT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CYBR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $70.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NTNX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $91.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check KSPI's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TOST's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $159.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CHKP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $24.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GEN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GENVR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NLOK's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $112.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GDDY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $93.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AKAM's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 77.82. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SAIL's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CFLT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $93.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DOCN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAYP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NTSK's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ALTR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PLAN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $37.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DBX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas S's P/E ratio is 109.05. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check S's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check INFA's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $216.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check QLYS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PATH's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check HCP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check JCOM's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $62.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DOX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $197.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check WEX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SQSP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NEWR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $43.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BOX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CCCS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $48.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 212.52. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VRNS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MBGL's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $24.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RELY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BB's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $44.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TENB's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NVEI's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DLO's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZW's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZZ's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZ's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $38.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FOUR's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ESMT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $52.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check APPN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AVPT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $34.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TDC's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SWI's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CLBT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EVOP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $39.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NTCT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $11.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check STNE's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $65.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EEFT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAYO's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $38.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RAMP's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CSGS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $58.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GCT's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AVDX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GETVV's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FORG's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $46.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PRGS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GSKY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ATEN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $48.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 229.72. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NYAX's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 193.93. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MQ's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PICS trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PICS's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GET's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check STER's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PGY's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ZUO's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SUMO's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GB's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NN's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BASE's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $44.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BAND's competition here

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $55.88 on the NASDAQ, while RDWR trades at $31.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 25.40, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RDWR's competition here