ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACIW | $46.39 | +2.70% | 4.7B | 18.19 | $2.55 | N/A |
| MSFT | $365.46 | -2.27% | 2.7T | 22.57 | $16.19 | +0.97% |
| ORCL | $157.64 | -4.55% | 453.4B | 20.66 | $7.63 | +1.28% |
| PLTR | $113.50 | -2.74% | 260.6B | 119.48 | $0.95 | N/A |
| PANW | $285.26 | -1.94% | 194.4B | 75.87 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $673.02 | -1.16% | 171.3B | 163.75 | $4.11 | N/A |
| FTNT | $145.28 | -1.84% | 106.4B | 48.27 | $3.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $463.93 | +0.53% | 88.9B | 34.60 | $13.41 | N/A |
| NET | $223.48 | -0.65% | 79.3B | 221.09 | $1.01 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACIW vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while MSFT trades at $365.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MSFT's competition here
ACIW vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 453.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ORCL trades at $157.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ORCL's competition here
ACIW vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PLTR trades at $113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 119.48. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PLTR's competition here
ACIW vs PANW Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 194.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PANW trades at $285.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 75.87. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PANW's competition here
ACIW vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CRWD trades at $673.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 163.75. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CRWD's competition here
ACIW vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while FTNT trades at $145.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 48.27. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FTNT's competition here
ACIW vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SNPS trades at $463.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SNPS's competition here
ACIW vs NET Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NET trades at $223.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 221.09. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NET's competition here
ACIW vs VMW Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VMW's competition here
ACIW vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CRWV trades at $100.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -42.93. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CRWV's competition here
ACIW vs SQ Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SQ's competition here
ACIW vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while XYZ trades at $75.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check XYZ's competition here
ACIW vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while TWLO trades at $188.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TWLO's competition here
ACIW vs NETE Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NETE's competition here
ACIW vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SPLK's competition here
ACIW vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while AFRM trades at $77.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 70.60. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AFRM's competition here
ACIW vs MDB Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while MDB trades at $302.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 57.16. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MDB's competition here
ACIW vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while VRSN trades at $252.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VRSN's competition here
ACIW vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CPAY trades at $344.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CPAY's competition here
ACIW vs FLT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FLT's competition here
ACIW vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while FFIV trades at $384.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FFIV's competition here
ACIW vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CYBR's competition here
ACIW vs ZS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ZS trades at $127.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ZS's competition here
ACIW vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while OKTA trades at $118.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check OKTA's competition here
ACIW vs IOT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while IOT trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check IOT's competition here
ACIW vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while AKAM trades at $119.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AKAM's competition here
ACIW vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while KSPI trades at $85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check KSPI's competition here
ACIW vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while DOCN trades at $148.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 82.52. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DOCN's competition here
ACIW vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while RBRK trades at $74.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 276.11. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RBRK's competition here
ACIW vs TOST Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while TOST trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TOST's competition here
ACIW vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NLOK's competition here
ACIW vs GEN Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GEN trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GEN's competition here
ACIW vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CHKP trades at $124.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CHKP's competition here
ACIW vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NTNX trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NTNX's competition here
ACIW vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CFLT's competition here
ACIW vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GDDY trades at $81.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GDDY's competition here
ACIW vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ALTR's competition here
ACIW vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PLAN's competition here
ACIW vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PAYP trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAYP's competition here
ACIW vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CORZZ trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZZ's competition here
ACIW vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CORZ trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -31.22. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZ's competition here
ACIW vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CORZW trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CORZW's competition here
ACIW vs INFA Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check INFA's competition here
ACIW vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SAIL trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -50.34. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SAIL's competition here
ACIW vs HCP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check HCP's competition here
ACIW vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while KLAR trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check KLAR's competition here
ACIW vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check JCOM's competition here
ACIW vs DBX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while DBX trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DBX's competition here
ACIW vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SQSP's competition here
ACIW vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NEWR's competition here
ACIW vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CCCS's competition here
ACIW vs DOX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while DOX trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DOX's competition here
ACIW vs PATH Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PATH trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PATH's competition here
ACIW vs S Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while S trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas S's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check S's competition here
ACIW vs BB Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while BB trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BB's competition here
ACIW vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NVEI's competition here
ACIW vs WEX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while WEX trades at $134.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check WEX's competition here
ACIW vs RELY Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while RELY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RELY's competition here
ACIW vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while VRNS trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 162.13. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check VRNS's competition here
ACIW vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while KVYO trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -468.17. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check KVYO's competition here
ACIW vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while QLYS trades at $115.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check QLYS's competition here
ACIW vs FOUR Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while FOUR trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FOUR's competition here
ACIW vs ESMT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ESMT's competition here
ACIW vs DLO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while DLO trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check DLO's competition here
ACIW vs BLSH Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while BLSH trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BLSH's competition here
ACIW vs SWI Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SWI's competition here
ACIW vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CLBT trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CLBT's competition here
ACIW vs TENB Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while TENB trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TENB's competition here
ACIW vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EVOP's competition here
ACIW vs TDC Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while TDC trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check TDC's competition here
ACIW vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while NTCT trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check NTCT's competition here
ACIW vs CCC Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CCC trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CCC's competition here
ACIW vs STNE Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while STNE trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check STNE's competition here
ACIW vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while EEFT trades at $67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EEFT's competition here
ACIW vs PAGS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PAGS trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAGS's competition here
ACIW vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ATEN trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ATEN's competition here
ACIW vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PAYO trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PAYO's competition here
ACIW vs WIX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while WIX trades at $42.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check WIX's competition here
ACIW vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check CSGS's competition here
ACIW vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while RAMP trades at $37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RAMP's competition here
ACIW vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while AVPT trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AVPT's competition here
ACIW vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check AVDX's competition here
ACIW vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GETVV's competition here
ACIW vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SPSC trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SPSC's competition here
ACIW vs FORG Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check FORG's competition here
ACIW vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GSKY's competition here
ACIW vs GET Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GET's competition here
ACIW vs RXT Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while RXT trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -37.89. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check RXT's competition here
ACIW vs WRD Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while WRD trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check WRD's competition here
ACIW vs MQ Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while MQ trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 397.00. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check MQ's competition here
ACIW vs BAND Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while BAND trades at $52.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BAND's competition here
ACIW vs STER Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check STER's competition here
ACIW vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while EVTC trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EVTC's competition here
ACIW vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while EVCM trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check EVCM's competition here
ACIW vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check ZUO's competition here
ACIW vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check SUMO's competition here
ACIW vs GB Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check GB's competition here
ACIW vs BASE Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check BASE's competition here
ACIW vs PICS Comparison June 2026
ACIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACIW stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACIW is priced at $46.39, while PICS trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACIW currently has a P/E ratio of 18.19, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, ACIW's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACIW is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACIW.Check PICS's competition here