Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QLYS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLYS | $161.35 | +5.67% | 5.3B | 20.59 | $7.36 | N/A |
| MSFT | $385.23 | +0.03% | 2.9T | 24.15 | $16.19 | +0.91% |
| ORCL | $129.08 | -8.22% | 379.3B | 17.26 | $7.63 | +1.51% |
| PLTR | $134.36 | +5.97% | 298.6B | 136.89 | $0.95 | N/A |
| PANW | $350.66 | +7.59% | 225.1B | 87.85 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $208.48 | +11.38% | 191.3B | 182.88 | $1.03 | N/A |
| FTNT | $165.11 | +4.83% | 117.7B | 53.36 | $3.01 | N/A |
| NET | $277.98 | +3.57% | 95.6B | 266.78 | $1.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $427.54 | -4.03% | 83.1B | 32.35 | $13.41 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QLYS vs MSFT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while MSFT trades at $385.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check MSFT's competition here
QLYS vs ORCL Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 379.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ORCL trades at $129.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ORCL's competition here
QLYS vs PLTR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PLTR trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 136.89. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PLTR's competition here
QLYS vs PANW Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 225.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PANW trades at $350.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 87.85. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PANW's competition here
QLYS vs CRWD Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 191.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CRWD trades at $208.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 182.88. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CRWD's competition here
QLYS vs FTNT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while FTNT trades at $165.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check FTNT's competition here
QLYS vs NET Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NET trades at $277.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 266.78. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NET's competition here
QLYS vs SNPS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SNPS trades at $427.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SNPS's competition here
QLYS vs VMW Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check VMW's competition here
QLYS vs SQ Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SQ's competition here
QLYS vs XYZ Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while XYZ trades at $79.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check XYZ's competition here
QLYS vs CRWV Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CRWV trades at $79.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -41.28. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CRWV's competition here
QLYS vs TWLO Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while TWLO trades at $216.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check TWLO's competition here
QLYS vs NETE Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NETE's competition here
QLYS vs AFRM Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while AFRM trades at $84.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 74.48. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check AFRM's competition here
QLYS vs MDB Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while MDB trades at $340.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 63.82. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check MDB's competition here
QLYS vs SPLK Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SPLK's competition here
QLYS vs VRSN Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while VRSN trades at $267.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check VRSN's competition here
QLYS vs FFIV Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while FFIV trades at $427.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check FFIV's competition here
QLYS vs CPAY Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CPAY trades at $358.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CPAY's competition here
QLYS vs OKTA Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while OKTA trades at $153.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check OKTA's competition here
QLYS vs ZS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ZS trades at $151.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ZS's competition here
QLYS vs FLT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check FLT's competition here
QLYS vs IOT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while IOT trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 59.40. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check IOT's competition here
QLYS vs CYBR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CYBR's competition here
QLYS vs AKAM Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while AKAM trades at $124.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check AKAM's competition here
QLYS vs TOST Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while TOST trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check TOST's competition here
QLYS vs RBRK Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while RBRK trades at $87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 310.59. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check RBRK's competition here
QLYS vs KSPI Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while KSPI trades at $89.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check KSPI's competition here
QLYS vs GENVR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GENVR trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GENVR's competition here
QLYS vs GEN Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GEN trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GEN's competition here
QLYS vs NTNX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NTNX trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NTNX's competition here
QLYS vs NLOK Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NLOK's competition here
QLYS vs CHKP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CHKP trades at $135.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CHKP's competition here
QLYS vs DOCN Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while DOCN trades at $125.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 68.49. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check DOCN's competition here
QLYS vs GDDY Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GDDY trades at $91.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GDDY's competition here
QLYS vs CFLT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CFLT's competition here
QLYS vs PAYP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PAYP trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PAYP's competition here
QLYS vs ALTR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ALTR's competition here
QLYS vs PLAN Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PLAN's competition here
QLYS vs SAIL Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SAIL trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SAIL's competition here
QLYS vs INFA Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check INFA's competition here
QLYS vs DBX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while DBX trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check DBX's competition here
QLYS vs KLAR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while KLAR trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -50.68. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check KLAR's competition here
QLYS vs CORZ Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CORZ trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -25.52. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CORZ's competition here
QLYS vs CORZW Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CORZW trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -14.49. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CORZW's competition here
QLYS vs HCP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check HCP's competition here
QLYS vs CORZZ Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CORZZ trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CORZZ's competition here
QLYS vs JCOM Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check JCOM's competition here
QLYS vs SQSP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SQSP's competition here
QLYS vs PATH Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PATH trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PATH's competition here
QLYS vs BB Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while BB trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 56.42. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check BB's competition here
QLYS vs S Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while S trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas S's P/E ratio is 84.34. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check S's competition here
QLYS vs NEWR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NEWR's competition here
QLYS vs ACIW Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ACIW trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ACIW's competition here
QLYS vs DOX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while DOX trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check DOX's competition here
QLYS vs CCCS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CCCS's competition here
QLYS vs WEX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while WEX trades at $155.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check WEX's competition here
QLYS vs VRNS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while VRNS trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 197.30. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check VRNS's competition here
QLYS vs KVYO Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while KVYO trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check KVYO's competition here
QLYS vs RELY Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while RELY trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 47.36. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check RELY's competition here
QLYS vs NVEI Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NVEI's competition here
QLYS vs FOUR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while FOUR trades at $50.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check FOUR's competition here
QLYS vs TENB Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while TENB trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check TENB's competition here
QLYS vs CLBT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CLBT trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CLBT's competition here
QLYS vs ESMT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ESMT's competition here
QLYS vs CCC Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CCC trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CCC's competition here
QLYS vs SWI Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SWI's competition here
QLYS vs TDC Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while TDC trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check TDC's competition here
QLYS vs NTCT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while NTCT trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check NTCT's competition here
QLYS vs EVOP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check EVOP's competition here
QLYS vs EEFT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while EEFT trades at $77.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check EEFT's competition here
QLYS vs WIX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while WIX trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check WIX's competition here
QLYS vs AVPT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while AVPT trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check AVPT's competition here
QLYS vs ATEN Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ATEN trades at $37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ATEN's competition here
QLYS vs PAYO Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PAYO trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PAYO's competition here
QLYS vs BAND Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while BAND trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 50.21. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check BAND's competition here
QLYS vs SPSC Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SPSC trades at $62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SPSC's competition here
QLYS vs CSGS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check CSGS's competition here
QLYS vs RAMP Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while RAMP trades at $38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check RAMP's competition here
QLYS vs AVDX Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check AVDX's competition here
QLYS vs GETVV Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GETVV's competition here
QLYS vs FORG Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check FORG's competition here
QLYS vs EVCM Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while EVCM trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 83.23. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check EVCM's competition here
QLYS vs GSKY Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GSKY's competition here
QLYS vs EVTC Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while EVTC trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check EVTC's competition here
QLYS vs GET Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GET's competition here
QLYS vs WRD Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while WRD trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check WRD's competition here
QLYS vs STER Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check STER's competition here
QLYS vs MQ Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while MQ trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -121.17. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check MQ's competition here
QLYS vs ZUO Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check ZUO's competition here
QLYS vs PICS Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PICS trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PICS's competition here
QLYS vs SUMO Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check SUMO's competition here
QLYS vs GB Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GB's competition here
QLYS vs PGY Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PGY trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PGY's competition here
QLYS vs BASE Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check BASE's competition here
QLYS vs RDWR Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while RDWR trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check RDWR's competition here
QLYS vs GCT Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while GCT trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is more volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check GCT's competition here
QLYS vs PGYWW Comparison July 2026
QLYS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLYS stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLYS is priced at $161.35, while PGYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLYS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.59, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, QLYS's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLYS is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLYS.Check PGYWW's competition here