Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See EEFT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for EEFT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | $72.18 | +2.05% | 2.7B | 7.11 | $10.15 | N/A |
| MSFT | $495.63 | +0.65% | 3.7T | 28.68 | $17.28 | +0.73% |
| ORCL | $150.28 | -1.74% | 432.5B | 19.68 | $7.63 | +1.32% |
| PLTR | $167.23 | +0.83% | 384B | 139.36 | $1.20 | N/A |
| PANW | $330.65 | -2.32% | 269.3B | 87.89 | $3.76 | N/A |
| CRWD | $206.74 | -1.02% | 210.5B | 201.21 | $1.03 | N/A |
| FTNT | $156.07 | -1.75% | 114.5B | 51.85 | $3.01 | N/A |
| NET | $306.53 | -1.49% | 108.8B | 303.50 | $1.01 | N/A |
| SNPS | $397.38 | +0.05% | 76.1B | 29.63 | $13.41 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)
EEFT vs MSFT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $495.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check MSFT's competition here
Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL)
EEFT vs ORCL Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 432.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $150.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ORCL's competition here
Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: PLTR)
EEFT vs PLTR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 384B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $167.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 139.36. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PLTR's competition here
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PANW)
EEFT vs PANW Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $330.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 87.89. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PANW's competition here
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWD)
EEFT vs CRWD Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 210.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $206.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 201.21. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CRWD's competition here
Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTNT)
EEFT vs FTNT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $156.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check FTNT's competition here
Cloudflare, Inc. (NYSE: NET)
EEFT vs NET Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $306.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 303.50. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NET's competition here
Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNPS)
EEFT vs SNPS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $397.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SNPS's competition here
VMware, Inc. (NYSE: VMW)
EEFT vs VMW Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check VMW's competition here
Nebius Group N.V. (NASDAQ: NBIS)
EEFT vs NBIS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $224.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -112.84. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NBIS's competition here
Block, Inc. (NYSE: SQ)
EEFT vs SQ Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SQ's competition here
CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: CRWV)
EEFT vs CRWV Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $88.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -44.10. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CRWV's competition here
Block, Inc. (NYSE: XYZ)
EEFT vs XYZ Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $79.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check XYZ's competition here
Twilio Inc. (NYSE: TWLO)
EEFT vs TWLO Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $227.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 43.13. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check TWLO's competition here
MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDB)
EEFT vs MDB Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $362.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 68.47. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check MDB's competition here
Gen Digital Inc. Contingent Value Rights (NASDAQ: GENVR)
EEFT vs GENVR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GENVR's competition here
Net Element, Inc. (NASDAQ: NETE)
EEFT vs NETE Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NETE's competition here
Okta, Inc. (NASDAQ: OKTA)
EEFT vs OKTA Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 47.03. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check OKTA's competition here
Corpay, Inc. (NYSE: CPAY)
EEFT vs CPAY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $408.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CPAY's competition here
Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZS)
EEFT vs ZS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $164.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ZS's competition here
VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN)
EEFT vs VRSN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $292.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check VRSN's competition here
Splunk Inc. (NASDAQ: SPLK)
EEFT vs SPLK Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SPLK's competition here
F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV)
EEFT vs FFIV Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $411.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check FFIV's competition here
Samsara Inc. (NYSE: IOT)
EEFT vs IOT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 61.90. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check IOT's competition here
FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: FLT)
EEFT vs FLT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check FLT's competition here
CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ: CYBR)
EEFT vs CYBR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CYBR's competition here
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (NASDAQ: KSPI)
EEFT vs KSPI Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $99.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check KSPI's competition here
Toast, Inc. (NYSE: TOST)
EEFT vs TOST Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check TOST's competition here
Gen Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: GEN)
EEFT vs GEN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GEN's competition here
Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE: RBRK)
EEFT vs RBRK Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $86.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 320.98. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check RBRK's competition here
Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTNX)
EEFT vs NTNX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $65.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NTNX's competition here
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM)
EEFT vs AKAM Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $106.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check AKAM's competition here
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DOCN)
EEFT vs DOCN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $122.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 73.98. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check DOCN's competition here
NortonLifeLock Inc. (NASDAQ: NLOK)
EEFT vs NLOK Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NLOK's competition here
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP)
EEFT vs CHKP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $131.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CHKP's competition here
GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE: GDDY)
EEFT vs GDDY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $98.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GDDY's competition here
PayPay Corporation (NASDAQ: PAYP)
EEFT vs PAYP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PAYP's competition here
Confluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: CFLT)
EEFT vs CFLT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CFLT's competition here
SailPoint, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAIL)
EEFT vs SAIL Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SAIL's competition here
Altair Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ: ALTR)
EEFT vs ALTR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ALTR's competition here
Anaplan, Inc. (NYSE: PLAN)
EEFT vs PLAN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PLAN's competition here
Dropbox, Inc. (NASDAQ: DBX)
EEFT vs DBX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check DBX's competition here
Informatica Inc. (NYSE: INFA)
EEFT vs INFA Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check INFA's competition here
UiPath Inc. (NYSE: PATH)
EEFT vs PATH Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PATH's competition here
HashiCorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCP)
EEFT vs HCP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check HCP's competition here
Ziff Davis, Inc. (NASDAQ: JCOM)
EEFT vs JCOM Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check JCOM's competition here
SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE: S)
EEFT vs S Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas S's P/E ratio is 89.77. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to S. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check S's competition here
Amdocs Limited (NASDAQ: DOX)
EEFT vs DOX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check DOX's competition here
WEX Inc. (NYSE: WEX)
EEFT vs WEX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $191.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check WEX's competition here
Squarespace, Inc. (NYSE: SQSP)
EEFT vs SQSP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SQSP's competition here
New Relic, Inc. (NYSE: NEWR)
EEFT vs NEWR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NEWR's competition here
Mobility Global Inc (NYSE: MBGL)
EEFT vs MBGL Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 48.05. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check MBGL's competition here
Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: NTSK)
EEFT vs NTSK Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NTSK's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: CORZ)
EEFT vs CORZ Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CORZ's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (NASDAQ: CORZZ)
EEFT vs CORZZ Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CORZZ's competition here
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CCCS)
EEFT vs CCCS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CCCS's competition here
ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW)
EEFT vs ACIW Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ACIW's competition here
Qualys, Inc. (NASDAQ: QLYS)
EEFT vs QLYS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $150.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check QLYS's competition here
Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS)
EEFT vs VRNS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 196.17. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check VRNS's competition here
Core Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: CORZW)
EEFT vs CORZW Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CORZW's competition here
Nuvei Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEI)
EEFT vs NVEI Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NVEI's competition here
Box, Inc. (NYSE: BOX)
EEFT vs BOX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check BOX's competition here
Remitly Global, Inc. (NASDAQ: RELY)
EEFT vs RELY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check RELY's competition here
Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PAY)
EEFT vs PAY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $36.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PAY's competition here
BlackBerry Limited (NYSE: BB)
EEFT vs BB Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check BB's competition here
Dlocal Limited (NASDAQ: DLO)
EEFT vs DLO Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check DLO's competition here
Shift4 Payments, Inc. (NYSE: FOUR)
EEFT vs FOUR Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check FOUR's competition here
EngageSmart, Inc. (NYSE: ESMT)
EEFT vs ESMT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ESMT's competition here
Tenable Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TENB)
EEFT vs TENB Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check TENB's competition here
SolarWinds Corporation (NYSE: SWI)
EEFT vs SWI Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SWI's competition here
EVO Payments, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVOP)
EEFT vs EVOP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check EVOP's competition here
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (NASDAQ: CLBT)
EEFT vs CLBT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CLBT's competition here
NetScout Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTCT)
EEFT vs NTCT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NTCT's competition here
AvePoint, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVPT)
EEFT vs AVPT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check AVPT's competition here
Teradata Corporation (NYSE: TDC)
EEFT vs TDC Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check TDC's competition here
Appian Corporation (NASDAQ: APPN)
EEFT vs APPN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check APPN's competition here
StoneCo Ltd. (NASDAQ: STNE)
EEFT vs STNE Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check STNE's competition here
Payoneer Global Inc. (NASDAQ: PAYO)
EEFT vs PAYO Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PAYO's competition here
CSG Systems International, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSGS)
EEFT vs CSGS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check CSGS's competition here
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RAMP)
EEFT vs RAMP Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check RAMP's competition here
AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVDX)
EEFT vs AVDX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check AVDX's competition here
Getnet Adquirência e Serviços para Meios de Pagamento S.A. (NASDAQ: GETVV)
EEFT vs GETVV Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GETVV's competition here
NextNav Inc. (NASDAQ: NN)
EEFT vs NN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NN's competition here
ForgeRock, Inc. (NYSE: FORG)
EEFT vs FORG Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check FORG's competition here
GigaCloud Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: GCT)
EEFT vs GCT Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $51.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GCT's competition here
GreenSky, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSKY)
EEFT vs GSKY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GSKY's competition here
Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ: BAND)
EEFT vs BAND Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check BAND's competition here
A10 Networks, Inc. (NYSE: ATEN)
EEFT vs ATEN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ATEN's competition here
Getnet Adquirência e Serviços para Meios de Pagamento S.A. (NASDAQ: GET)
EEFT vs GET Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GET's competition here
Nayax Ltd. (NASDAQ: NYAX)
EEFT vs NYAX Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $47.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check NYAX's competition here
Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: PGY)
EEFT vs PGY Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PGY's competition here
Sterling Check Corp. (NASDAQ: STER)
EEFT vs STER Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check STER's competition here
Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS)
EEFT vs PRGS Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check PRGS's competition here
Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ: MQ)
EEFT vs MQ Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check MQ's competition here
Zuora, Inc. (NYSE: ZUO)
EEFT vs ZUO Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check ZUO's competition here
Sumo Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUMO)
EEFT vs SUMO Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check SUMO's competition here
Global Blue Group Holding AG (NYSE: GB)
EEFT vs GB Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check GB's competition here
Couchbase, Inc. (NASDAQ: BASE)
EEFT vs BASE Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check BASE's competition here
Boost Run Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: BRUN)
EEFT vs BRUN Comparison September 2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: EEFT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EEFT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EEFT is priced at $72.18 on the NASDAQ, while BRUN trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EEFT currently has a P/E ratio of 7.11, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -34.65. In terms of profitability, EEFT's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EEFT is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EEFT.Check BRUN's competition here