Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOUR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUR | $44.56 | +1.67% | 4.1B | 51.21 | $0.87 | N/A |
| MSFT | $450.24 | +5.45% | 3.3T | 26.80 | $16.80 | +0.80% |
| ORCL | $225.78 | +10.84% | 649.4B | 40.61 | $5.56 | +0.90% |
| PLTR | $156.54 | +9.21% | 359.5B | 175.94 | $0.89 | N/A |
| PANW | $281.69 | +9.28% | 192B | 157.37 | $1.79 | N/A |
| CRWD | $731.00 | +8.94% | 186.1B | -1124.62 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| FTNT | $137.97 | +6.38% | 101.1B | 53.47 | $2.58 | N/A |
| SNPS | $475.62 | -1.04% | 91.1B | 108.83 | $4.37 | N/A |
| NET | $241.82 | +6.01% | 85.5B | -1008.04 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FOUR vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while MSFT trades at $450.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MSFT's competition here
FOUR vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 649.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ORCL trades at $225.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ORCL's competition here
FOUR vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 359.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PLTR trades at $156.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 175.94. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLTR's competition here
FOUR vs PANW Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PANW trades at $281.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 157.37. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PANW's competition here
FOUR vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 186.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CRWD trades at $731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -1124.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWD's competition here
FOUR vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while FTNT trades at $137.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FTNT's competition here
FOUR vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SNPS trades at $475.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 108.83. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SNPS's competition here
FOUR vs NET Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NET trades at $241.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -1008.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NET's competition here
FOUR vs VMW Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VMW's competition here
FOUR vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CRWV trades at $109.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWV's competition here
FOUR vs SQ Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQ's competition here
FOUR vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while XYZ trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 59.16. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check XYZ's competition here
FOUR vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while TWLO trades at $190.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 288.82. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TWLO's competition here
FOUR vs NETE Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NETE's competition here
FOUR vs MDB Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while MDB trades at $335.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -381.31. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MDB's competition here
FOUR vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPLK's competition here
FOUR vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while VRSN trades at $285.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRSN's competition here
FOUR vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while AFRM trades at $73.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 66.95. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AFRM's competition here
FOUR vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CPAY trades at $361.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CPAY's competition here
FOUR vs ZS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ZS trades at $139.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -291.10. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZS's competition here
FOUR vs FLT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FLT's competition here
FOUR vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while AKAM trades at $149.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AKAM's competition here
FOUR vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while FFIV trades at $383.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FFIV's competition here
FOUR vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while OKTA trades at $123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 89.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check OKTA's competition here
FOUR vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CYBR's competition here
FOUR vs IOT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while IOT trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1748.50. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check IOT's competition here
FOUR vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while KSPI trades at $90.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KSPI's competition here
FOUR vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while DOCN trades at $155.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 68.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOCN's competition here
FOUR vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while RBRK trades at $78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -44.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RBRK's competition here
FOUR vs GEN Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GEN trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GEN's competition here
FOUR vs TOST Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while TOST trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TOST's competition here
FOUR vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NLOK's competition here
FOUR vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CHKP trades at $135.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CHKP's competition here
FOUR vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NTNX trades at $52.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 56.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTNX's competition here
FOUR vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PAYP trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAYP's competition here
FOUR vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GDDY trades at $85.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GDDY's competition here
FOUR vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CFLT's competition here
FOUR vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SAIL trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SAIL's competition here
FOUR vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ALTR's competition here
FOUR vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLAN's competition here
FOUR vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CORZ trades at $26.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZ's competition here
FOUR vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CORZZ trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZZ's competition here
FOUR vs INFA Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check INFA's competition here
FOUR vs HCP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check HCP's competition here
FOUR vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while KLAR trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KLAR's competition here
FOUR vs DBX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while DBX trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DBX's competition here
FOUR vs DOX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while DOX trades at $62.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOX's competition here
FOUR vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check JCOM's competition here
FOUR vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQSP's competition here
FOUR vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CORZW trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZW's competition here
FOUR vs PATH Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PATH trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PATH's competition here
FOUR vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NEWR's competition here
FOUR vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCCS's competition here
FOUR vs S Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while S trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas S's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check S's competition here
FOUR vs BLSH Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while BLSH trades at $34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BLSH's competition here
FOUR vs BB Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while BB trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BB's competition here
FOUR vs WEX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while WEX trades at $144.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WEX's competition here
FOUR vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NVEI's competition here
FOUR vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while KVYO trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -528.83. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KVYO's competition here
FOUR vs ACIW Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ACIW trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ACIW's competition here
FOUR vs RELY Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while RELY trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RELY's competition here
FOUR vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while VRNS trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -30.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRNS's competition here
FOUR vs ESMT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ESMT's competition here
FOUR vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while QLYS trades at $109.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check QLYS's competition here
FOUR vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CLBT trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 52.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CLBT's competition here
FOUR vs DLO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while DLO trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DLO's competition here
FOUR vs TDC Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while TDC trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TDC's competition here
FOUR vs SWI Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SWI's competition here
FOUR vs TENB Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while TENB trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -282.30. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TENB's competition here
FOUR vs WIX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while WIX trades at $56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is -77.86. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WIX's competition here
FOUR vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVOP's competition here
FOUR vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while NTCT trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTCT's competition here
FOUR vs STNE Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while STNE trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check STNE's competition here
FOUR vs CCC Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CCC trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 78.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCC's competition here
FOUR vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while EEFT trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EEFT's competition here
FOUR vs PAGS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PAGS trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAGS's competition here
FOUR vs WRD Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while WRD trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WRD's competition here
FOUR vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while AVPT trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVPT's competition here
FOUR vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CSGS's competition here
FOUR vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while RAMP trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RAMP's competition here
FOUR vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ATEN trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ATEN's competition here
FOUR vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SPSC trades at $56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPSC's competition here
FOUR vs BAND Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while BAND trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -170.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BAND's competition here
FOUR vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVDX's competition here
FOUR vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GETVV's competition here
FOUR vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while EVCM trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVCM's competition here
FOUR vs FORG Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FORG's competition here
FOUR vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GSKY's competition here
FOUR vs GET Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GET's competition here
FOUR vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PAYO trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAYO's competition here
FOUR vs MQ Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while MQ trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 406.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MQ's competition here
FOUR vs STER Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check STER's competition here
FOUR vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZUO's competition here
FOUR vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while EVTC trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVTC's competition here
FOUR vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SUMO's competition here
FOUR vs GB Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GB's competition here
FOUR vs BRAI Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while BRAI trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas BRAI's P/E ratio is -89.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BRAI's competition here
FOUR vs PICS Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while PICS trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PICS's competition here
FOUR vs BASE Comparison June 2026
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $44.56, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 51.21, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BASE's competition here