Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while MSFT trades at $385.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MSFT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 405.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ORCL trades at $140.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ORCL's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 291.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PLTR trades at $126.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 133.46. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLTR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PANW trades at $325.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 86.68. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PANW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 190.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CRWD trades at $187.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 182.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWD's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while FTNT trades at $157.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FTNT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NET trades at $268.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 265.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NET's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SNPS trades at $445.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SNPS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VMW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CRWV trades at $88.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -44.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while XYZ trades at $77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check XYZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while TWLO trades at $214.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TWLO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while AFRM trades at $83.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 75.84. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AFRM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NETE's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while MDB trades at $342.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MDB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPLK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while VRSN trades at $270.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRSN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while FFIV trades at $430.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FFIV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CPAY trades at $353.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CPAY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while OKTA trades at $138.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check OKTA's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ZS trades at $139.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FLT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while IOT trades at $36.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 59.21. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check IOT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CYBR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while AKAM trades at $126.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AKAM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while RBRK trades at $84.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 312.48. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RBRK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while KSPI trades at $89.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KSPI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while TOST trades at $29.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TOST's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GENVR trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GENVR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GEN trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GEN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NTNX trades at $54.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTNX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NLOK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CHKP trades at $131.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CHKP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while DOCN trades at $130.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 72.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOCN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GDDY trades at $88.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GDDY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CFLT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PAYP trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAYP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ALTR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLAN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SAIL trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 48.96. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SAIL's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check INFA's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CORZZ trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CORZW trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CORZ trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while DBX trades at $29.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DBX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while KLAR trades at $19.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -51.63. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KLAR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check HCP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check JCOM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQSP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while BB trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 57.68. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PATH trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PATH's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NEWR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while S trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas S's P/E ratio is 81.25. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check S's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ACIW trades at $56.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ACIW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCCS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while DOX trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while WEX trades at $157.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WEX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while QLYS trades at $152.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check QLYS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while VRNS trades at $44.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 193.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRNS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while KVYO trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KVYO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while RELY trades at $23.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RELY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NVEI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while TENB trades at $39.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TENB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CLBT trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CLBT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ESMT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CCC trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SWI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while TDC trades at $33.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TDC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while NTCT trades at $43.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTCT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVOP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while EEFT trades at $77.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EEFT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while WIX trades at $50.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WIX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ATEN trades at $37.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ATEN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while AVPT trades at $12.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVPT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while BAND trades at $75.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 51.35. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BAND's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PAYO trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAYO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while RAMP trades at $37.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RAMP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CSGS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SPSC trades at $60.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPSC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVDX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GETVV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FORG's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GSKY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while EVTC trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVTC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while EVCM trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 78.23. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVCM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GET's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while WRD trades at $5.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WRD's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PGYWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PGYWW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check STER's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while MQ trades at $15.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -117.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MQ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZUO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PICS trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PICS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SUMO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while PGY trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PGY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while RDWR trades at $31.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RDWR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BASE's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $50.81, while RXT trades at $5.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -29.63. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RXT's competition here