CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while MSFT trades at $365.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check MSFT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 453.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ORCL trades at $157.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ORCL's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PLTR trades at $113.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 119.48. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PLTR's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 194.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PANW trades at $285.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 75.87. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PANW's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CRWD trades at $673.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 163.75. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CRWD's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while FTNT trades at $145.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 48.27. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check FTNT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SNPS trades at $463.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SNPS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NET trades at $223.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 221.09. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NET's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check VMW's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CRWV trades at $100.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -42.93. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CRWV's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SQ's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while XYZ trades at $75.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check XYZ's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while TWLO trades at $188.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check TWLO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NETE's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SPLK's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while AFRM trades at $77.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 70.60. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check AFRM's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while MDB trades at $302.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 57.16. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check MDB's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while VRSN trades at $252.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check VRSN's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CPAY trades at $344.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CPAY's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check FLT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while FFIV trades at $384.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check FFIV's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ZS trades at $127.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ZS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while OKTA trades at $118.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check OKTA's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while IOT trades at $31.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check IOT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while AKAM trades at $119.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check AKAM's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while KSPI trades at $85.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check KSPI's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while DOCN trades at $148.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 82.52. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check DOCN's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while RBRK trades at $74.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 276.11. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check RBRK's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while TOST trades at $26.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check TOST's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NLOK's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GEN trades at $23.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GEN's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CHKP trades at $124.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CHKP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NTNX trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NTNX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and CFLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFLT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GDDY trades at $81.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GDDY's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTR's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PLAN's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PAYP trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PAYP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CORZZ trades at $27.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CORZZ's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CORZ trades at $27.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -31.22. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CORZ's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CORZW trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CORZW's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and INFA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INFA's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SAIL trades at $12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -50.34. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SAIL's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check HCP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while KLAR trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check KLAR's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check JCOM's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while DBX trades at $26.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check DBX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SQSP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NEWR's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CCCS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while DOX trades at $51.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check DOX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PATH trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PATH's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while S trades at $15.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas S's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check S's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while BB trades at $8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check BB's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVEI's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ACIW trades at $46.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ACIW's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while WEX trades at $134.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check WEX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while RELY trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check RELY's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while VRNS trades at $37.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 162.13. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check VRNS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while KVYO trades at $14.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -468.17. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check KVYO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while QLYS trades at $115.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check QLYS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while FOUR trades at $44.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check FOUR's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ESMT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while DLO trades at $12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check DLO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while BLSH trades at $23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check BLSH's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SWI's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CLBT trades at $12.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CLBT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while TENB trades at $27.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check TENB's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check EVOP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while TDC trades at $31.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check TDC's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while NTCT trades at $40.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check NTCT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CCC trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CCC's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while STNE trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check STNE's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while EEFT trades at $67.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check EEFT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PAGS trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PAGS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ATEN trades at $34.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ATEN's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PAYO trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PAYO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while WIX trades at $42.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check WIX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check CSGS's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while RAMP trades at $37.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check RAMP's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while AVPT trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check AVPT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and AVDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVDX's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GETVV's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SPSC trades at $55.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SPSC's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check FORG's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GSKY's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GET's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, RXT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while RXT trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas RXT's P/E ratio is -37.89. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to RXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check RXT's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while WRD trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check WRD's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while MQ trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 397.00. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check MQ's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while BAND trades at $52.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check BAND's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check STER's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while EVTC trades at $26.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check EVTC's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while EVCM trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check EVCM's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check ZUO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check SUMO's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check GB's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR and BASE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BASE's competition here

CYBR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYBR stands at 20.6B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBR is priced at $408.85, while PICS trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYBR currently has a P/E ratio of -139.06, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, CYBR's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBR is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBR.Check PICS's competition here