Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PRGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRGS | $38.21 | +13.78% | 1.6B | 6.29 | $6.23 | N/A |
| APP | $526.62 | +2.21% | 189.7B | 49.05 | $11.51 | N/A |
| SAP | $162.22 | +5.26% | 185.5B | 21.34 | $7.46 | +1.84% |
| SHOP | $119.63 | +4.77% | 157.8B | 80.55 | $1.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $73.42 | +1.75% | 147.9B | 15.80 | $4.60 | N/A |
| CRM | $165.75 | +5.80% | 133.7B | 11.79 | $13.85 | +1.30% |
| NOW | $106.18 | +6.95% | 109.1B | 28.80 | $3.67 | N/A |
| CDNS | $373.93 | -0.37% | 104.2B | 50.16 | $7.53 | N/A |
| DDOG | $259.96 | -0.15% | 94.1B | 120.22 | $2.20 | N/A |
| SNOW | $256.68 | +0.85% | 90.5B | 185.10 | $1.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PRGS vs APP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while APP trades at $526.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 49.05. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check APP's competition here
PRGS vs SAP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 185.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SAP trades at $162.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SAP's competition here
PRGS vs SHOP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SHOP trades at $119.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 80.55. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SHOP's competition here
PRGS vs UBER Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while UBER trades at $73.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check UBER's competition here
PRGS vs CRM Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CRM trades at $165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CRM's competition here
PRGS vs NOW Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NOW trades at $106.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NOW's competition here
PRGS vs CDNS Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CDNS trades at $373.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 50.16. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CDNS's competition here
PRGS vs DDOG Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DDOG trades at $259.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 120.22. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DDOG's competition here
PRGS vs SNOW Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SNOW trades at $256.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 185.10. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SNOW's competition here
PRGS vs ADBE Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ADBE trades at $221.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ADBE's competition here
PRGS vs INTU Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while INTU trades at $275.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check INTU's competition here
PRGS vs ADSK Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ADSK trades at $208.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ADSK's competition here
PRGS vs ROP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ROP trades at $364.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ROP's competition here
PRGS vs WDAY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while WDAY trades at $135.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check WDAY's competition here
PRGS vs ANSS Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ANSS's competition here
PRGS vs STRF Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while STRF trades at $94.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STRF's competition here
PRGS vs FICO Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while FICO trades at $1,257.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FICO's competition here
PRGS vs MSTR Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while MSTR trades at $99.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MSTR's competition here
PRGS vs ZM Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ZM trades at $87.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ZM's competition here
PRGS vs STRC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while STRC trades at $86.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STRC's competition here
PRGS vs TEAM Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while TEAM trades at $84.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TEAM's competition here
PRGS vs STRK Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while STRK trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STRK's competition here
PRGS vs STRD Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while STRD trades at $60.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STRD's competition here
PRGS vs AZPN Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AZPN's competition here
PRGS vs GRABW Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GRABW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GRABW's competition here
PRGS vs GRAB Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GRAB trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GRAB's competition here
PRGS vs SSNC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SSNC trades at $65.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SSNC's competition here
PRGS vs PTC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PTC trades at $124.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PTC's competition here
PRGS vs DT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DT trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DT's competition here
PRGS vs U Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while U trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas U's P/E ratio is -28.21. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check U's competition here
PRGS vs TYL Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while TYL trades at $318.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TYL's competition here
PRGS vs BKI Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BKI's competition here
PRGS vs WULF Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while WULF trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check WULF's competition here
PRGS vs DAY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DAY's competition here
PRGS vs XM Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check XM's competition here
PRGS vs FROG Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while FROG trades at $94.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 101.56. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FROG's competition here
PRGS vs CDAY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CDAY's competition here
PRGS vs GWRE Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GWRE trades at $134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GWRE's competition here
PRGS vs HUBS Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while HUBS trades at $191.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check HUBS's competition here
PRGS vs FIG Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while FIG trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FIG's competition here
PRGS vs BSY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BSY trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BSY's competition here
PRGS vs YMM Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while YMM trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check YMM's competition here
PRGS vs DOCU Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DOCU trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DOCU's competition here
PRGS vs MANH Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while MANH trades at $151.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MANH's competition here
PRGS vs OCFT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check OCFT's competition here
PRGS vs NATI Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NATI's competition here
PRGS vs SMAR Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SMAR's competition here
PRGS vs COMP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while COMP trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 627.25. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check COMP's competition here
PRGS vs PAYC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PAYC trades at $137.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PAYC's competition here
PRGS vs CWAN Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CWAN's competition here
PRGS vs IDCC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while IDCC trades at $278.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check IDCC's competition here
PRGS vs TTAN Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while TTAN trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TTAN's competition here
PRGS vs PCOR Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PCOR trades at $43.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PCOR's competition here
PRGS vs COUP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check COUP's competition here
PRGS vs CVLT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CVLT trades at $149.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CVLT's competition here
PRGS vs DSGX Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DSGX trades at $73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DSGX's competition here
PRGS vs ESTC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ESTC trades at $57.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ESTC's competition here
PRGS vs PCTY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PCTY trades at $115.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PCTY's competition here
PRGS vs APPF Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while APPF trades at $170.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check APPF's competition here
PRGS vs NAVN Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NAVN trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 373.08. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NAVN's competition here
PRGS vs DUOL Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DUOL trades at $122.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DUOL's competition here
PRGS vs LYFT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while LYFT trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check LYFT's competition here
PRGS vs YOU Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while YOU trades at $53.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 44.90. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check YOU's competition here
PRGS vs NICE Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NICE trades at $97.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NICE's competition here
PRGS vs OTEX Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while OTEX trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check OTEX's competition here
PRGS vs GTLB Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GTLB trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GTLB's competition here
PRGS vs ZETA Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ZETA trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ZETA's competition here
PRGS vs PEGA Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PEGA trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PEGA's competition here
PRGS vs DAVE Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while DAVE trades at $385.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DAVE's competition here
PRGS vs GBTG Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GBTG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 134.29. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GBTG's competition here
PRGS vs OCTVV Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check OCTVV's competition here
PRGS vs LIF Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while LIF trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check LIF's competition here
PRGS vs OCTV Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while OCTV trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 51.55. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OCTV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check OCTV's competition here
PRGS vs STUB Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while STUB trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STUB's competition here
PRGS vs SRAD Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while SRAD trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SRAD's competition here
PRGS vs GRND-WT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
PRGS vs CVT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CVT's competition here
PRGS vs PTRN Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PTRN trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PTRN's competition here
PRGS vs PYCR Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PYCR's competition here
PRGS vs MNDY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while MNDY trades at $79.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MNDY's competition here
PRGS vs BILL Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BILL trades at $39.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BILL's competition here
PRGS vs BLSH Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BLSH trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 67.23. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BLSH's competition here
PRGS vs BULL Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BULL trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BULL's competition here
PRGS vs BOX Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BOX trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BOX's competition here
PRGS vs PWSC Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PWSC's competition here
PRGS vs BTDR Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while BTDR trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BTDR's competition here
PRGS vs RNG Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while RNG trades at $40.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check RNG's competition here
PRGS vs ADEA Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ADEA trades at $28.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ADEA's competition here
PRGS vs AYX Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AYX's competition here
PRGS vs ENV Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ENV's competition here
PRGS vs INST Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check INST's competition here
PRGS vs PPLI Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PPLI trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is -48.87. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PPLI's competition here
PRGS vs ZI Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ZI's competition here
PRGS vs PSFE-WT Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
PRGS vs NATL Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NATL trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NATL's competition here
PRGS vs NP Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while NP trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas NP's P/E ratio is 83.17. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NP's competition here
PRGS vs QTWO Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while QTWO trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check QTWO's competition here
PRGS vs AGYS Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while AGYS trades at $111.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 61.17. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AGYS's competition here
PRGS vs FSLY Comparison July 2026
PRGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $38.21, while FSLY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.29, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FSLY's competition here