Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $513.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MSFT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 434.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $150.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ORCL's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 427.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $186.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 155.24. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PLTR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 302.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $371.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 98.83. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PANW's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 222.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $218.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 212.55. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CRWD's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $166.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 55.15. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FTNT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $299.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 296.67. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NET's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $442.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SNPS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check VMW's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SQ's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $209.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -105.12. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NBIS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $83.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check XYZ's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $84.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -41.74. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CRWV's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $237.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 45.11. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TWLO's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $446.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 84.43. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MDB's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GENVR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $184.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ZS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NETE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NETE's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $166.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 46.96. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check OKTA's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $407.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CPAY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SPLK's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $291.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check VRSN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 66.40. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check IOT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while FFIV trades at $394.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FFIV's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FLT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CYBR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $35.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TOST's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $106.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check KSPI's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $93.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 344.52. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check RBRK's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $69.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NTNX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $31.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GEN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $107.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AKAM's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NLOK's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $138.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CHKP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $111.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 66.99. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DOCN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $97.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GDDY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $19.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 70.82. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SAIL's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CFLT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PAYP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PATH's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ALTR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PLAN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $35.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DBX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check INFA's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $21.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas S's P/E ratio is 98.02. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check S's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check HCP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $62.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DOX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check JCOM's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $197.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check WEX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $187.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check QLYS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SQSP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NEWR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NTSK's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 48.19. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MBGL's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CCCS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $26.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check RELY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $53.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ACIW's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CORZZ's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CORZ's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $43.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 190.96. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check VRNS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $34.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BOX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NVEI's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BB's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $35.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PAY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check DLO's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CORZW's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $37.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TENB's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $43.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FOUR's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ESMT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SWI's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check APPN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check EVOP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 51.59. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CLBT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AVPT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NTCT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $28.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check TDC's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $69.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check EEFT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PAYO's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STNE's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check CSGS's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $37.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check RAMP's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NN trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NN's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check AVDX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GETVV's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $52.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GCT's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check FORG's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GSKY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $51.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 79.77. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check NYAX's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ATEN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $21.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check PGY's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GET's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check STER's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 169.44. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check MQ's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BAND's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check ZUO's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check SUMO's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check GB's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while BRUN trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -35.52. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRUN's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BRUN's competition here

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PRGS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PRGS is priced at $44.76 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PRGS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.18, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, PRGS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PRGS is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PRGS.Check BASE's competition here