J-Star Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares
J-Star Holding Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (YMAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMAT | $0.31 | -8.26% | 5.6M | 8.21 | $0.04 | N/A |
| LIN | $495.47 | +1.03% | 228.9B | 33.85 | $14.59 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $322.72 | +1.58% | 79.2B | 31.16 | $10.26 | +0.99% |
| ECL | $273.21 | -0.97% | 77.7B | 38.25 | $7.17 | +0.97% |
| APD | $289.23 | -0.43% | 64.1B | -195.83 | -$1.47 | +2.46% |
| LYB | $71.37 | -3.98% | 23.3B | -29.16 | -$2.48 | +6.60% |
| PPG | $103.17 | +2.42% | 22.8B | 14.72 | $6.92 | +2.76% |
| SQM | $76.12 | +0.59% | 21.3B | 36.13 | $2.06 | +0.16% |
| DD | $45.54 | +0.43% | 18.8B | 213.79 | $0.21 | +1.65% |
| ALB | $162.01 | -0.90% | 18.6B | -27.47 | -$5.76 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
YMAT vs LIN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 228.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while LIN trades at $495.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check LIN's competition here
YMAT vs SHW Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SHW trades at $322.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SHW's competition here
YMAT vs ECL Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ECL trades at $273.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ECL's competition here
YMAT vs APD Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while APD trades at $289.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -195.83. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check APD's competition here
YMAT vs LYB Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while LYB trades at $71.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -29.16. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check LYB's competition here
YMAT vs PPG Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while PPG trades at $103.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check PPG's competition here
YMAT vs SQM Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SQM trades at $76.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SQM's competition here
YMAT vs DD Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while DD trades at $45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 213.79. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check DD's competition here
YMAT vs ALB Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ALB trades at $162.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -27.47. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ALB's competition here
YMAT vs IFF Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while IFF trades at $69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -49.37. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check IFF's competition here
YMAT vs WLK Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while WLK trades at $111.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check WLK's competition here
YMAT vs RPM Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while RPM trades at $100.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check RPM's competition here
YMAT vs SOLS Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SOLS trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SOLS's competition here
YMAT vs EMN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while EMN trades at $70.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check EMN's competition here
YMAT vs ESI Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ESI trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ESI's competition here
YMAT vs SSL Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SSL trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SSL's competition here
YMAT vs ALTM Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ALTM's competition here
YMAT vs IKNX Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check IKNX's competition here
YMAT vs AXTA Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while AXTA trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check AXTA's competition here
YMAT vs NEU Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while NEU trades at $605.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check NEU's competition here
YMAT vs BCPC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while BCPC trades at $168.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check BCPC's competition here
YMAT vs SXT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SXT trades at $89.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SXT's competition here
YMAT vs CBT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CBT trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CBT's competition here
YMAT vs PRM Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while PRM trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check PRM's competition here
YMAT vs AVNT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while AVNT trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check AVNT's competition here
YMAT vs WDFC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while WDFC trades at $227.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check WDFC's competition here
YMAT vs LTHM Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check LTHM's competition here
YMAT vs FUL Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while FUL trades at $54.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check FUL's competition here
YMAT vs HWKN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while HWKN trades at $141.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check HWKN's competition here
YMAT vs OLN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while OLN trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check OLN's competition here
YMAT vs CC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CC trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CC's competition here
YMAT vs NGVT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while NGVT trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -15.56. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check NGVT's competition here
YMAT vs ASH Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ASH trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ASH's competition here
YMAT vs MTX Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while MTX trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -115.93. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check MTX's competition here
YMAT vs KWR Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while KWR trades at $117.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -847.29. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check KWR's competition here
YMAT vs PQG Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check PQG's competition here
YMAT vs IOSP Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while IOSP trades at $68.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check IOSP's competition here
YMAT vs REX Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while REX trades at $40.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check REX's competition here
YMAT vs ECVT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ECVT trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 229.70. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ECVT's competition here
YMAT vs CCF Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CCF's competition here
YMAT vs LWLG Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while LWLG trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -44.76. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check LWLG's competition here
YMAT vs GPRE Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while GPRE trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check GPRE's competition here
YMAT vs SCL Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SCL trades at $46.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SCL's competition here
YMAT vs ODC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 884.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ODC trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ODC's competition here
YMAT vs KOP Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while KOP trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check KOP's competition here
YMAT vs KRO Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 592.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while KRO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check KRO's competition here
YMAT vs GEVO Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 576.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while GEVO trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check GEVO's competition here
YMAT vs ADUR Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ADUR trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ADUR's competition here
YMAT vs ALTO Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 360.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ALTO trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ALTO's competition here
YMAT vs OEC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while OEC trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check OEC's competition here
YMAT vs HDSN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while HDSN trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check HDSN's competition here
YMAT vs CMT Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CMT trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CMT's competition here
YMAT vs NTIC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while NTIC trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -289.33. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check NTIC's competition here
YMAT vs FSI Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while FSI trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check FSI's competition here
YMAT vs LOOP Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while LOOP trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check LOOP's competition here
YMAT vs VNTR Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check VNTR's competition here
YMAT vs SNES Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while SNES trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check SNES's competition here
YMAT vs GURE Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while GURE trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check GURE's competition here
YMAT vs TSE Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while TSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check TSE's competition here
YMAT vs CNEY Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CNEY trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CNEY's competition here
YMAT vs DNMR Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check DNMR's competition here
YMAT vs CRKN Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check CRKN's competition here
YMAT vs HGAS Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 200.8K. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check HGAS's competition here
YMAT vs HGASW Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 7.3K. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check HGASW's competition here
YMAT vs MOOV Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. YMAT has daily volatility of 13.97 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
YMAT vs FOE Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check FOE's competition here
YMAT vs TREC Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check TREC's competition here
YMAT vs AVTR-PA Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
YMAT vs KRA Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check KRA's competition here
YMAT vs ZY Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check ZY's competition here
YMAT vs GCP Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check GCP's competition here
YMAT vs AMRS Comparison March 2026
YMAT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMAT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YMAT is priced at $0.31, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, YMAT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, YMAT is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMAT.Check AMRS's competition here