Westlake Corporation
Westlake Corporation WLK Peers
See (WLK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLK | $87.31 | +1.90% | 11.2B | 29.20 | $2.99 | +2.41% |
| LIN | $469.99 | -0.43% | 221.2B | 34.16 | $13.76 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $342.94 | +0.84% | 86B | 34.06 | $10.07 | +0.88% |
| ECL | $268.50 | -0.76% | 76.1B | 36.47 | $7.36 | +0.94% |
| APD | $297.89 | -0.08% | 66.3B | 42.92 | $6.94 | +2.39% |
| DD | $76.58 | -1.24% | 32.1B | 2553.00 | $0.03 | +2.06% |
| PPG | $116.61 | +1.05% | 26.5B | 20.64 | $5.65 | +2.34% |
| LYB | $67.22 | +2.77% | 21.6B | 23.26 | $2.89 | +8.03% |
| IFF | $77.46 | +0.68% | 19.8B | -23.76 | -$3.26 | +2.07% |
| RPM | $112.95 | +0.93% | 14.5B | 22.62 | $4.99 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
WLK vs LIN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while LIN trades at $469.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SHW Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SHW trades at $342.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ECL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ECL trades at $268.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs APD Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while APD trades at $297.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs DD Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while DD trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2553.00. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PPG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while PPG trades at $116.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LYB Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while LYB trades at $67.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IFF Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while IFF trades at $77.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.76. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs RPM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while RPM trades at $112.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SQM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SQM trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVTR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while AVTR trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALB Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ALB trades at $78.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs EMN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while EMN trades at $79.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NEU Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while NEU trades at $725.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AXTA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while AXTA trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALTM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IKNX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ESI Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ESI trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs BCPC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while BCPC trades at $150.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SXT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SXT trades at $108.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CBT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CBT trades at $78.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SSL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SSL trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HWKN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while HWKN trades at $159.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FUL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while FUL trades at $60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVNT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while AVNT trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LTHM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs WDFC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while WDFC trades at $216.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs OLN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while OLN trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PRM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while PRM trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ASH Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ASH trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -28.03. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KWR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while KWR trades at $125.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CC trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 81.22. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IOSP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while IOSP trades at $85.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 79.46. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PQG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs MTX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while MTX trades at $60.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -77.13. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NGVT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while NGVT trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SCL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SCL trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CCF Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ECVT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ECVT trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -87.85. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs REX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 910.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while REX trades at $55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ODC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 825.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ODC trades at $60.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KRO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 723.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while KRO trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KOP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 686.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while KOP trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs OEC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 648.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while OEC trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GPRE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while GPRE trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GEVO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 371.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while GEVO trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HDSN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 359.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while HDSN trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ADUR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ADUR trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -37.07. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LWLG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while LWLG trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CMT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CMT trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs TSE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while TSE trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALTO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ALTO trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NTIC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while NTIC trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FSI Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while FSI trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LOOP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while LOOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs VNTR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SNES Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while SNES trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GURE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while GURE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CNEY Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CNEY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CRKN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while CRKN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs DNMR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HGAS Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 777.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while HGAS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HGASW Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs MOOV Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLK has daily volatility of 2.67 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
WLK vs AMRS Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ZY Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FOE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KRA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GCP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs TREC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVTR-PA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $87.31, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 29.20, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.