Westlake Corporation
Westlake Corporation WLK Peers
See (WLK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLK | $82.21 | -5.84% | 10.5B | 27.51 | $2.99 | +2.41% |
| LIN | $471.49 | +0.32% | 221.9B | 34.22 | $13.78 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $340.21 | -0.80% | 85.3B | 33.76 | $10.08 | +0.88% |
| ECL | $269.83 | +0.50% | 76.6B | 36.69 | $7.36 | +0.94% |
| APD | $297.22 | -0.22% | 66.2B | 42.77 | $6.95 | +2.39% |
| DD | $74.80 | -2.32% | 31.3B | 2493.33 | $0.03 | +2.06% |
| PPG | $115.02 | -1.36% | 26.1B | 20.32 | $5.66 | +2.34% |
| LYB | $60.70 | -9.70% | 19.5B | 21.00 | $2.89 | +8.03% |
| IFF | $75.88 | -2.03% | 19.4B | -23.27 | -$3.26 | +2.07% |
| RPM | $122.64 | +8.58% | 15.7B | 24.55 | $4.99 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
WLK vs LIN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while LIN trades at $471.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SHW Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SHW trades at $340.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ECL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ECL trades at $269.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs APD Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while APD trades at $297.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs DD Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while DD trades at $74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2493.33. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PPG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while PPG trades at $115.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LYB Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while LYB trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IFF Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while IFF trades at $75.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs RPM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while RPM trades at $122.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SQM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SQM trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALB Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ALB trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVTR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while AVTR trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs EMN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while EMN trades at $77.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NEU Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while NEU trades at $718.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AXTA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while AXTA trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALTM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IKNX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ESI Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ESI trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs BCPC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while BCPC trades at $149.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SXT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SXT trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CBT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CBT trades at $75.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SSL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SSL trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HWKN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while HWKN trades at $154.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FUL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while FUL trades at $59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVNT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while AVNT trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LTHM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs WDFC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while WDFC trades at $210.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PRM Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while PRM trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs OLN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while OLN trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ASH Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ASH trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.97. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KWR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while KWR trades at $121.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs IOSP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while IOSP trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 77.91. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CC trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 77.75. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs PQG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs MTX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while MTX trades at $59.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -75.97. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NGVT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while NGVT trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SCL Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SCL trades at $56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CCF Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ECVT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ECVT trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -87.70. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs REX Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 882.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while REX trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ODC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 814.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ODC trades at $59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KRO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while KRO trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KOP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while KOP trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs OEC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 632.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while OEC trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GPRE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 527.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while GPRE trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HDSN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while HDSN trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GEVO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 359.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while GEVO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LWLG Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while LWLG trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ADUR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ADUR trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.79. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CMT Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CMT trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs TSE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 106.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while TSE trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ALTO Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ALTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs NTIC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while NTIC trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FSI Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while FSI trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs LOOP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while LOOP trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs VNTR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs SNES Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while SNES trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GURE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while GURE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CNEY Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CNEY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs CRKN Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while CRKN trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs DNMR Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HGAS Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 777.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while HGAS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs HGASW Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs MOOV Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WLK has daily volatility of 5.15 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
WLK vs AMRS Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs ZY Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs FOE Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs KRA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs GCP Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs TREC Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.
WLK vs AVTR-PA Comparison
WLK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLK stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WLK is priced at $82.21, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.51, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLK is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLK.