WD-40 Company

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 225.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while LIN trades at $478.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check LIN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SHW trades at $367.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SHW's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ECL trades at $278.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ECL's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while APD trades at $294.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check APD's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while DD trades at $77.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 454.88. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check DD's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while PPG trades at $112.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check PPG's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while LYB trades at $56.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 125.04. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check LYB's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while IFF trades at $67.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check IFF's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while RPM trades at $125.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check RPM's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while WLK trades at $87.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -174.38. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check WLK's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ALB trades at $81.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ALB's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while AVTR trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check AVTR's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while EMN trades at $68.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check EMN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while NEU trades at $799.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check NEU's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while AXTA trades at $31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check AXTA's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SQM trades at $47.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SQM's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ALTM's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ESI trades at $25.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ESI's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check IKNX's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while BCPC trades at $162.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check BCPC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SXT trades at $113.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SXT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CBT trades at $81.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CBT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SSL trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SSL's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while HWKN trades at $171.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check HWKN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while AVNT trades at $37.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check AVNT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while FUL trades at $61.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check FUL's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check LTHM's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while PRM trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check PRM's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while OLN trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -210.59. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check OLN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ASH trades at $56.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ASH's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while KWR trades at $144.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -344.98. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check KWR's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CC trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while IOSP trades at $86.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 113.14. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check IOSP's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while NGVT trades at $57.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check NGVT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while MTX trades at $63.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 6384.00. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check MTX's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check PQG's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CCF's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SCL trades at $50.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SCL's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ECVT trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -76.58. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ECVT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while REX trades at $60.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check REX's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ODC trades at $58.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ODC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while KRO trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check KRO's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while OEC trades at $10.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check OEC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while KOP trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check KOP's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while GPRE trades at $9.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check GPRE's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while HDSN trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check HDSN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while GEVO trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check GEVO's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ADUR trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.93. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ADUR's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while LWLG trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check LWLG's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CMT trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CMT's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while FSI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check FSI's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while TSE trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check TSE's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ALTO trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ALTO's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while NTIC trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check NTIC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while LOOP trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check LOOP's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check VNTR's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while SNES trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check SNES's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while GURE trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check GURE's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CNEY trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CNEY's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check DNMR's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while CRKN trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check CRKN's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 726.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while HGAS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check HGAS's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check HGASW's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WDFC has daily volatility of 1.01 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check AMRS's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check TREC's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check KRA's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check GCP's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check ZY's competition here

WDFC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WDFC stands at 3B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WDFC is priced at $221.00, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WDFC currently has a P/E ratio of 35.00, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WDFC's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WDFC is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WDFC.Check FOE's competition here