Sasol Limited

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while LIN trades at $472.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check LIN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while SHW trades at $340.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check SHW's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ECL trades at $271.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ECL's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while APD trades at $299.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check APD's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while DD trades at $75.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2526.33. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check DD's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while PPG trades at $115.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check PPG's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while LYB trades at $64.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check LYB's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while IFF trades at $76.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check IFF's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while RPM trades at $122.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check RPM's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while SQM trades at $41.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check SQM's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while WLK trades at $85.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check WLK's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ALB trades at $83.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ALB's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while AVTR trades at $14.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check AVTR's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while EMN trades at $78.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check EMN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while NEU trades at $706.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check NEU's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while AXTA trades at $29.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check AXTA's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ALTM's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check IKNX's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ESI trades at $23.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ESI's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while BCPC trades at $148.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check BCPC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while SXT trades at $113.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check SXT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CBT trades at $76.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CBT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while HWKN trades at $158.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check HWKN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while FUL trades at $59.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check FUL's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while AVNT trades at $33.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check AVNT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check LTHM's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while WDFC trades at $210.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check WDFC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while PRM trades at $16.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check PRM's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while OLN trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check OLN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ASH trades at $51.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ASH's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while KWR trades at $122.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check KWR's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CC trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 78.72. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while IOSP trades at $84.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 78.13. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check IOSP's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while MTX trades at $65.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check MTX's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check PQG's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while NGVT trades at $46.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check NGVT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while SCL trades at $57.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check SCL's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CCF's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ECVT trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -89.95. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ECVT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while REX trades at $54.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check REX's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 803.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ODC trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ODC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 706.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while KRO trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check KRO's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 691.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while KOP trades at $34.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check KOP's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while OEC trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check OEC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 542.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while GPRE trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check GPRE's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while HDSN trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check HDSN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while GEVO trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check GEVO's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while LWLG trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check LWLG's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ADUR trades at $10.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ADUR's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CMT trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CMT's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while TSE trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check TSE's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ALTO trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ALTO's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while NTIC trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check NTIC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while LOOP trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check LOOP's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while FSI trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check FSI's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check VNTR's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while SNES trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check SNES's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while GURE trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check GURE's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CNEY trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CNEY's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while CRKN trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check CRKN's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check DNMR's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 725.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while HGAS trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check HGAS's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check HGASW's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SSL has daily volatility of 3.95 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check GCP's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check KRA's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check TREC's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check AMRS's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check ZY's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

SSL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SSL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSL is priced at $5.12, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SSL currently has a P/E ratio of -1.16, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSL's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSL is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSL.Check FOE's competition here