Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 213.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LIN trades at $452.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 119.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AIQUF trades at $206.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 119.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AIQUY trades at $41.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SHW trades at $362.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 71.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ECL trades at $252.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 60.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while APD trades at $271.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 54.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PTCAY trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -569.18. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 45.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GVDBF trades at $4,890.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 44.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GVDNY trades at $96.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 40.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SXYAY trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SKFOF trades at $237.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 33.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AKZOY trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 31.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NVZMF trades at $67.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 88.55. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 31.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NVZMY trades at $66.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 88.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 27.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DD trades at $66.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2225.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 24.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PPG trades at $109.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 18.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IFF trades at $73.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LYB trades at $56.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 16.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SYIEY trades at $29.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SYIEF trades at $116.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while EMSHF trades at $651.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NPCPF trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while RPM trades at $110.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 12.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while COVTY trades at $33.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -41.81. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 12.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NDEKY trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NDEKF trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -39.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AKZOF trades at $66.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 10.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while EVKIF trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while EVKIY trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while WLK trades at $80.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BNTGY trades at $13.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BNTGF trades at $67.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while EMN trades at $77.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AVTR trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SCVPY trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IMDZF trades at $127.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TKKYY trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALB trades at $57.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AXTA trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ASGLF trades at $31.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FUPBY trades at $12.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ASGLY trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NEU trades at $633.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KPTCY trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while OCLDY trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while COIHY trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while COIHF trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ARKAF trades at $74.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ARKAY trades at $74.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BCPC trades at $164.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.46. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ESI trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MITUF trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MITUY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SXT trades at $95.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CLZNF trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CBT trades at $73.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AZLGF trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FUPEF trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while WKCMF trades at $74.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CLZNY trades at $10.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AVNT trades at $36.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MBGCF trades at $17.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while WDFC trades at $231.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while JMPLY trades at $35.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FUL trades at $54.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HXPLF trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ICPVF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while INCZY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LNXSF trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KPLIF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while JMPLF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HWKN trades at $119.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KSANF trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while OLN trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LNXSY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ASH trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DACHF trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IOSP trades at $90.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 63.74. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SSL trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SASOF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KWR trades at $103.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MTX trades at $56.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -71.90. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while OCINF trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PRM trades at $11.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -290.25. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CC trades at $11.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KANKF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NGVT trades at $40.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ELKEF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CSNVY trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALPKF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SCL trades at $53.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CSNVF trades at $20.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALZCF trades at $101.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 878.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HUABF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 847.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ECVT trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -72.20. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 839.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KRO trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AECLY trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while VTXPF trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HASGF trades at $19.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DALQF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 736.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DLNDY trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 719.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 683.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while REX trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 619.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ODC trades at $45.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SYHMY has a market cap of 616.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SYHMY trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SYHMY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYHMY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SYHMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 603.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 589.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while OEC trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 554.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KOP trades at $27.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 489.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FPLSF trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 403.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 392.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FLRAF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 333.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NOPMF trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 333.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 328.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HDSN trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 277.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GEVO trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 266.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GPRE trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TITMF has a market cap of 205.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TITMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TITMF's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TITMF's ROE of -13.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TITMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DCHCF has a market cap of 201.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DCHCF trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DCHCF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DCHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to DCHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GGELU has a market cap of 199.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GGELU trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GGELU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GGELU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GGELU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, VNTRF has a market cap of 196.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while VNTRF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas VNTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VNTRF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to VNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 183.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ADUR trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -21.62. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ICHMF has a market cap of 167.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ICHMF trades at $32.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ICHMF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ICHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ICHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ECSNF has a market cap of 166.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ECSNF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ECSNF's P/E ratio is -142.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECSNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ECSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NANX has a market cap of 157.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NANX trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NANX's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NANX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NANX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 144.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CMT trades at $15.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, COOSF has a market cap of 129.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while COOSF trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas COOSF's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to COOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 125.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LWLG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, YIPCF has a market cap of 105.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while YIPCF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas YIPCF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YIPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to YIPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HERC has a market cap of 95.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HERC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HERC's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KBLB has a market cap of 91.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KBLB trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KBLB's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KBLB's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to KBLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 89.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TSE trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, UNIKF has a market cap of 85.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while UNIKF trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas UNIKF's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UNIKF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to UNIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BADG has a market cap of 85.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BADG trades at $4,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BADG's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BADG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to BADG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ABSSF has a market cap of 81.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ABSSF trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ABSSF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABSSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ABSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AVTXF has a market cap of 75.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AVTXF trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AVTXF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVTXF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AVTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SWIOU has a market cap of 72.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SWIOU trades at $8,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SWIOU's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SWIOU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SWIOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 68.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NTIC trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 66.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALTO trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IOFNF has a market cap of 59.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IOFNF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IOFNF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IOFNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to IOFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 56.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FSI trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NNOMF has a market cap of 54.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NNOMF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NNOMF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNOMF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NNOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PRMFF has a market cap of 52.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PRMFF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PRMFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PRMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GMGMF has a market cap of 48.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GMGMF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GMGMF's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GMGMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 47.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while LOOP trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, BIOF has a market cap of 40.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while BIOF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas BIOF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BIOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to BIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GLGI has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GLGI trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GLGI's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GLGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ITXXF has a market cap of 29.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ITXXF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ITXXF's P/E ratio is -15.71. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ITXXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ITXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, STCB has a market cap of 23.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while STCB trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas STCB's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STCB's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to STCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HGCPF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HGCPF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HGCPF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HGCPF's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM and HGCPF have similar daily volatility (1.54).

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CANOF has a market cap of 18.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CANOF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CANOF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CANOF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CANOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NNUP has a market cap of 16.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NNUP trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NNUP's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NNUP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NNUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DTPKF has a market cap of 10.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DTPKF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DTPKF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DTPKF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to DTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AVOA has a market cap of 10.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AVOA trades at $1,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AVOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AVOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NMGX has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NMGX trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NMGX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NMGX's ROE of +38.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NMGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AXIIF has a market cap of 8.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AXIIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AXIIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AXIIF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AXIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AUTR has a market cap of 7.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AUTR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AUTR's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AUTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HDGHF has a market cap of 6.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HDGHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HDGHF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HDGHF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HDGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 6.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GURE trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FAME has a market cap of 6.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FAME trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FAME's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FAME's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ESKNF has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ESKNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ESKNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESKNF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ESKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SNES trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TORM has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TORM trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TORM's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TORM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, VRSRF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while VRSRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas VRSRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRSRF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to VRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CRKN trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FRXIF has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FRXIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FRXIF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FRXIF's ROE of +20.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FRXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, COWI has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while COWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas COWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COWI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to COWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ILDO has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ILDO trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ILDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILDO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ILDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CNEY trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HYDI has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HYDI trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HYDI's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HYDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HYDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HGAS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PYMOF has a market cap of 754677.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PYMOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PYMOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PYMOF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MDRA has a market cap of 686926.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MDRA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MDRA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MDRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to MDRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GSPI has a market cap of 637216.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GSPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GSPI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GSPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, IZCFF has a market cap of 424070.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while IZCFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas IZCFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IZCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to IZCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GPHBF has a market cap of 387670.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GPHBF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GPHBF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GPHBF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GPHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ALKN has a market cap of 375739.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ALKN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ALKN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALKN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, APGMF has a market cap of 321692.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while APGMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas APGMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APGMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to APGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CBNT has a market cap of 238521.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CBNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CBNT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CBNT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CBNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PVNNF has a market cap of 232379.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PVNNF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PVNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, INTK has a market cap of 223229.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while INTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas INTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INTK's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to INTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MOPN has a market cap of 200000.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MOPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MOPN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MOPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to MOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SIXWF has a market cap of 144354.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SIXWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SIXWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SIXWF's ROE of +109.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SIXWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NFTI has a market cap of 70438.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NFTI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NFTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NFTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SRGE has a market cap of 54588.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SRGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SRGE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ZENG has a market cap of 53223.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ZENG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ZENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZENG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ZENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GNPG has a market cap of 49999.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GNPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GNPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GNPG's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GNPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HYGN has a market cap of 36326.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HYGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HYGN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HYGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HYPF has a market cap of 34018.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HYPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HYPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HYPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, RNWB has a market cap of 18814.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while RNWB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas RNWB's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RNWB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to RNWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FLMP has a market cap of 12780.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FLMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FLMP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLMP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FLMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CLTH has a market cap of 10073.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CLTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CLTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ENDO has a market cap of 6789.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ENDO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ENDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENDO's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ENDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, WLAB has a market cap of 6378.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while WLAB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas WLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to WLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FLKI has a market cap of 5776.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FLKI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FLKI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLKI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ACRB has a market cap of 5606.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ACRB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ACRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ACRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ACRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NTCHF has a market cap of 4807.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NTCHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NTCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, RNWF has a market cap of 3878.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while RNWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas RNWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RNWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to RNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SVXA has a market cap of 3661.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SVXA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SVXA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVXA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SVXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ETCK has a market cap of 3638.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ETCK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ETCK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ETCK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ETCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CCGY has a market cap of 3151.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CCGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CCGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CCGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CCGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, SEVT has a market cap of 3054.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while SEVT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas SEVT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SEVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SEVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GELV has a market cap of 2842.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GELV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GELV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GELV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GELV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CLKTF has a market cap of 2009.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CLKTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CLKTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLKTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CLKTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SQM has daily volatility of 1.54 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, NWGN has a market cap of 67.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while NWGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas NWGN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NWGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NWGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, JSCPY has a market cap of 51.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while JSCPY trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas JSCPY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JSCPY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to JSCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GTBT has a market cap of 47.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GTBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GTBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GTBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GAEC has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GAEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GAEC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GAEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GAEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, UETH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while UETH trades at $26.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas UETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to UETH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to UETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AMRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ZY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KRA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, TREC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ESPI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ESPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ESPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESPI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ESPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PARPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PARPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PARPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PARPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PARPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, FOE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GLYE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GLYE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GLYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, CXDC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while CXDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas CXDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CXDC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CXDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, PTBBU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while PTBBU trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas PTBBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTBBU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PTBBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, KOGL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while KOGL trades at $57.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas KOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KOGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, GCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, AVTR-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ACEEU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ACEEU trades at $5,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ACEEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ACEEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ACEEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, ESPID comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while ESPID trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas ESPID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESPID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ESPID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.

SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 9.78B. In comparison, RDSMY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $34.85, while RDSMY trades at $33.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQM currently has a P/E ratio of -24.54, whereas RDSMY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RDSMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to RDSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.