Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. SQM Peers
See (SQM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | $37.44 | +6.35% | 10.5B | 17.75 | $2.11 | N/A |
| LIN | $477.17 | +0.09% | 224.6B | 34.60 | $13.79 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $352.51 | -0.79% | 88.4B | 33.35 | $10.57 | +0.85% |
| ECL | $272.46 | -0.06% | 77.3B | 37.12 | $7.34 | +0.92% |
| APD | $290.30 | +1.69% | 64.6B | 41.77 | $6.95 | +2.46% |
| DD | $72.95 | +2.10% | 30.5B | 2432.67 | $0.03 | +2.17% |
| PPG | $118.59 | +1.87% | 26.9B | 20.99 | $5.65 | +2.29% |
| LYB | $62.56 | +2.22% | 20.1B | 21.65 | $2.89 | +8.58% |
| IFF | $76.63 | +2.05% | 19.6B | -23.51 | -$3.26 | +2.09% |
| RPM | $113.12 | +0.65% | 14.5B | 22.67 | $4.99 | +1.76% |
Stock Comparison
SQM vs LIN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 224.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while LIN trades at $477.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs SHW Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while SHW trades at $352.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ECL Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ECL trades at $272.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs APD Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while APD trades at $290.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs DD Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while DD trades at $72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2432.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs PPG Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while PPG trades at $118.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs LYB Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while LYB trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs IFF Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while IFF trades at $76.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs RPM Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while RPM trades at $113.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs WLK Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while WLK trades at $81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs AVTR Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while AVTR trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs EMN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while EMN trades at $79.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ALB Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ALB trades at $67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs AXTA Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while AXTA trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs NEU Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while NEU trades at $720.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ALTM Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs IKNX Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ESI Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ESI trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs BCPC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while BCPC trades at $163.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs SXT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while SXT trades at $105.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CBT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CBT trades at $78.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs FUL Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while FUL trades at $62.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs SSL Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while SSL trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs AVNT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while AVNT trades at $34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs HWKN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while HWKN trades at $150.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs WDFC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while WDFC trades at $231.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs LTHM Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs OLN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while OLN trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ASH Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ASH trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs PRM Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while PRM trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs IOSP Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while IOSP trades at $88.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 81.57. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs KWR Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while KWR trades at $123.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs PQG Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CC trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 70.78. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs MTX Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while MTX trades at $58.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -75.65. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs NGVT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while NGVT trades at $46.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs SCL Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while SCL trades at $58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CCF Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ECVT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ECVT trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -83.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs REX Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 847.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while REX trades at $51.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ODC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 819.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ODC trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs KRO Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 759.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while KRO trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs KOP Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 682.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while KOP trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs OEC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 631.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while OEC trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs GPRE Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 426.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while GPRE trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs HDSN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 356.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while HDSN trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs GEVO Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while GEVO trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ADUR Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ADUR trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -31.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs LWLG Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while LWLG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CMT Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CMT trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs TSE Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while TSE trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ALTO Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ALTO trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs NTIC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while NTIC trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs FSI Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while FSI trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs LOOP Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while LOOP trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs VNTR Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs GURE Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while GURE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs SNES Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while SNES trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CNEY Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CNEY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs CRKN Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while CRKN trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs DNMR Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs HGAS Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 660.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while HGAS trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs HGASW Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs MOOV Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SQM has daily volatility of 4.32 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
SQM vs KRA Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs FOE Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs AMRS Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs GCP Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs TREC Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs AVTR-PA Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.
SQM vs ZY Comparison
SQM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQM stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQM is priced at $37.44, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQM currently has a P/E ratio of 17.75, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SQM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQM is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQM.