SenesTech, Inc.
SenesTech, Inc. (SNES) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNES | $2.40 | +0.00% | 12.3M | -1.07 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| LIN | $490.11 | +0.00% | 231.8B | 33.98 | $14.61 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $357.61 | +0.00% | 89.4B | 35.11 | $10.27 | +0.88% |
| ECL | $301.00 | +0.00% | 86.3B | 41.73 | $7.29 | +0.88% |
| APD | $280.72 | +0.00% | 62.6B | -191.31 | -$1.47 | +2.54% |
| PPG | $124.25 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 18.29 | $6.92 | +2.22% |
| DD | $50.24 | +0.00% | 21.1B | 239.98 | $0.21 | +1.41% |
| IFF | $81.62 | +0.00% | 20.8B | -55.75 | -$1.46 | +1.98% |
| SQM | $72.10 | +0.00% | 20.5B | -39.05 | -$1.84 | +0.17% |
| ALB | $168.41 | +0.00% | 19.8B | -29.24 | -$5.76 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
SNES vs LIN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while LIN trades at $490.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LIN's competition here
SNES vs SHW Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SHW trades at $357.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SHW's competition here
SNES vs ECL Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ECL trades at $301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ECL's competition here
SNES vs APD Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while APD trades at $280.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -191.31. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check APD's competition here
SNES vs PPG Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while PPG trades at $124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PPG's competition here
SNES vs DD Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while DD trades at $50.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 239.98. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check DD's competition here
SNES vs IFF Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while IFF trades at $81.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IFF's competition here
SNES vs SQM Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SQM trades at $72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SQM's competition here
SNES vs ALB Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ALB trades at $168.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALB's competition here
SNES vs LYB Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while LYB trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LYB's competition here
SNES vs RPM Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while RPM trades at $114.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check RPM's competition here
SNES vs SOLS Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SOLS trades at $77.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SOLS's competition here
SNES vs WLK Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while WLK trades at $95.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check WLK's competition here
SNES vs EMN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while EMN trades at $78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check EMN's competition here
SNES vs ESI Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ESI trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ESI's competition here
SNES vs AXTA Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while AXTA trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AXTA's competition here
SNES vs ALTM Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALTM's competition here
SNES vs IKNX Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IKNX's competition here
SNES vs NEU Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while NEU trades at $607.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NEU's competition here
SNES vs SSL Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SSL trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SSL's competition here
SNES vs BCPC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while BCPC trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check BCPC's competition here
SNES vs CBT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CBT trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CBT's competition here
SNES vs PRM Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while PRM trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PRM's competition here
SNES vs AVNT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while AVNT trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AVNT's competition here
SNES vs SXT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SXT trades at $90.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SXT's competition here
SNES vs FUL Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while FUL trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FUL's competition here
SNES vs WDFC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while WDFC trades at $238.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check WDFC's competition here
SNES vs HWKN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while HWKN trades at $144.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HWKN's competition here
SNES vs KWR Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while KWR trades at $173.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -335.33. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KWR's competition here
SNES vs LTHM Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LTHM's competition here
SNES vs ASH Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ASH trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ASH's competition here
SNES vs OLN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while OLN trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check OLN's competition here
SNES vs NGVT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while NGVT trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NGVT's competition here
SNES vs CC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CC trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CC's competition here
SNES vs MTX Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while MTX trades at $72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -122.08. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check MTX's competition here
SNES vs IOSP Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while IOSP trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is -2030.50. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check IOSP's competition here
SNES vs PQG Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check PQG's competition here
SNES vs SCL Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while SCL trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check SCL's competition here
SNES vs ECVT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ECVT trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -42.91. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ECVT's competition here
SNES vs CCF Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CCF's competition here
SNES vs REX Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while REX trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check REX's competition here
SNES vs GPRE Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while GPRE trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GPRE's competition here
SNES vs ODC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ODC trades at $63.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ODC's competition here
SNES vs KRO Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 702.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while KRO trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KRO's competition here
SNES vs KOP Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 688.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while KOP trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KOP's competition here
SNES vs LWLG Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while LWLG trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LWLG's competition here
SNES vs GEVO Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while GEVO trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GEVO's competition here
SNES vs ADUR Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ADUR trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ADUR's competition here
SNES vs OEC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while OEC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check OEC's competition here
SNES vs HDSN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while HDSN trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HDSN's competition here
SNES vs ALTO Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ALTO trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ALTO's competition here
SNES vs CMT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CMT trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CMT's competition here
SNES vs NTIC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while NTIC trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -302.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check NTIC's competition here
SNES vs FSI Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while FSI trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FSI's competition here
SNES vs LOOP Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while LOOP trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check LOOP's competition here
SNES vs VNTR Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check VNTR's competition here
SNES vs TSE Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while TSE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check TSE's competition here
SNES vs GURE Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while GURE trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GURE's competition here
SNES vs YMAT Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while YMAT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check YMAT's competition here
SNES vs CNEY Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CNEY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CNEY's competition here
SNES vs DNMR Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check DNMR's competition here
SNES vs CRKN Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check CRKN's competition here
SNES vs HGAS Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 172.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HGAS's competition here
SNES vs HGASW Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check HGASW's competition here
SNES vs MOOV Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SNES has daily volatility of 12.07 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
SNES vs GCP Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check GCP's competition here
SNES vs AMRS Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AMRS's competition here
SNES vs TREC Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check TREC's competition here
SNES vs KRA Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check KRA's competition here
SNES vs FOE Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check FOE's competition here
SNES vs ZY Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check ZY's competition here
SNES vs AVTR-PA Comparison February 2026
SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 12.3M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.40, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.07, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -0.98%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.Check AVTR-PA's competition here