SenesTech, Inc.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 213.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while LIN trades at $454.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while SHW trades at $362.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 72.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ECL trades at $254.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 61.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while APD trades at $276.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while DD trades at $71.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2375.67. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while PPG trades at $114.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while IFF trades at $76.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.41. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while LYB trades at $60.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while RPM trades at $114.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while WLK trades at $85.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 10.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while SQM trades at $36.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while EMN trades at $82.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while AVTR trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ALB trades at $61.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while AXTA trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while NEU trades at $637.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ESI trades at $22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while BCPC trades at $165.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CBT trades at $76.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while SXT trades at $94.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while AVNT trades at $39.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while WDFC trades at $237.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while FUL trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while OLN trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while HWKN trades at $117.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ASH trades at $52.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while SSL trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while IOSP trades at $90.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 63.87. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while KWR trades at $109.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while MTX trades at $58.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -74.79. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CC trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 66.56. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while PRM trades at $11.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -295.75. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while NGVT trades at $43.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while SCL trades at $55.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 869.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while KRO trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 864.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ECVT trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -73.60. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 687.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while REX trades at $41.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 632.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ODC trades at $46.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 604.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while KOP trades at $29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 602.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while OEC trades at $10.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 339.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while HDSN trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 304.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while GPRE trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 285.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while GEVO trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 184.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ADUR trades at $6.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 143.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CMT trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 132.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while LWLG trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 90.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while TSE trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while NTIC trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 66.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while ALTO trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 54.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while FSI trades at $4.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 46.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while LOOP trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while GURE trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CRKN trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while CNEY trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while HGAS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNES is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNES.

SNES plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNES stands at 4.94M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNES is priced at $2.78, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNES currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNES's ROE is -1.78%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SNES has daily volatility of 3.62 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.