Livent Corporation
Livent Corporation LTHM Peers
See (LTHM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTHM | $16.51 | -8.53% | 3B | 9.17 | $1.80 | N/A |
| LIN | $466.60 | +0.13% | 219.6B | 33.84 | $13.79 | +1.24% |
| SHW | $335.78 | -0.03% | 84.1B | 31.74 | $10.58 | +0.90% |
| ECL | $266.21 | +0.76% | 75.5B | 36.22 | $7.35 | +0.92% |
| APD | $280.58 | +0.07% | 62.4B | 40.37 | $6.95 | +2.54% |
| DD | $67.96 | +1.63% | 28.4B | 2265.33 | $0.03 | +2.33% |
| PPG | $109.06 | +2.60% | 24.8B | 19.27 | $5.66 | +2.51% |
| LYB | $61.22 | +1.86% | 19.7B | 21.18 | $2.89 | +8.88% |
| IFF | $76.75 | +0.86% | 19.6B | -23.54 | -$3.26 | +2.09% |
| RPM | $108.81 | +0.67% | 14B | 21.85 | $4.98 | +1.83% |
Stock Comparison
LTHM vs LIN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 219.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LIN trades at $466.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SHW Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SHW trades at $335.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ECL Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ECL trades at $266.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs APD Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while APD trades at $280.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs DD Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while DD trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2265.33. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs PPG Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PPG trades at $109.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs LYB Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LYB trades at $61.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs IFF Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IFF trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.54. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs RPM Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while RPM trades at $108.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs WLK Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while WLK trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SQM Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SQM trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs AVTR Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVTR trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs EMN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while EMN trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ALB Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALB trades at $60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs AXTA Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AXTA trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ALTM Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs NEU Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NEU trades at $638.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs IKNX Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ESI Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ESI trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs BCPC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while BCPC trades at $159.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SXT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SXT trades at $94.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CBT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CBT trades at $74.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs WDFC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while WDFC trades at $244.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SSL Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SSL trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs AVNT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVNT trades at $34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs FUL Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FUL trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs HWKN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HWKN trades at $136.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs OLN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while OLN trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ASH Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ASH trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.71. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs IOSP Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while IOSP trades at $84.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 78.16. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs KWR Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KWR trades at $116.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs PRM Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PRM trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs PQG Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs MTX Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while MTX trades at $54.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -71.82. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CC trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 60.75. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs NGVT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NGVT trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SCL Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SCL trades at $55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CCF Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ECVT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 935.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ECVT trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -79.65. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs REX Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 786.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while REX trades at $47.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ODC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 769.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ODC trades at $56.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs KRO Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 716.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KRO trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs KOP Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 637.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KOP trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs OEC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 581.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while OEC trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs GPRE Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GPRE trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs HDSN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HDSN trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs GEVO Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GEVO trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ADUR Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ADUR trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs LWLG Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LWLG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CMT Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CMT trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs TSE Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while TSE trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ALTO Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ALTO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs LOOP Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while LOOP trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs NTIC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while NTIC trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs FSI Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FSI trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs VNTR Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CNEY Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CNEY trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs GURE Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GURE trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs SNES Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while SNES trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs CRKN Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while CRKN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs DNMR Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs HGAS Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 833.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HGAS trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs HGASW Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs MOOV Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LTHM has daily volatility of 11.04 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
LTHM vs FOE Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs ZY Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs AVTR-PA Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs TREC Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs AMRS Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs GCP Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.
LTHM vs KRA Comparison
LTHM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTHM stands at 3B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LTHM is priced at $16.51, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTHM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LTHM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTHM is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTHM.