Loop Industries, Inc.
Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOOP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOOP | $1.51 | +7.86% | 70.1M | -5.25 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| LIN | $478.15 | -0.53% | 225.9B | 34.21 | $14.08 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $366.94 | +0.85% | 93B | 36.93 | $10.10 | +0.83% |
| ECL | $278.80 | -1.50% | 80.5B | 37.98 | $7.47 | +0.89% |
| APD | $294.98 | +0.50% | 66.6B | 42.46 | $7.05 | +2.38% |
| DD | $76.96 | +3.23% | 32.4B | 454.88 | $0.17 | +2.04% |
| PPG | $112.22 | +0.58% | 25.8B | 20.66 | $5.53 | +2.40% |
| LYB | $56.66 | +2.15% | 18.9B | 125.04 | $0.47 | +9.14% |
| IFF | $67.17 | +1.57% | 17.4B | -44.15 | -$1.54 | +2.35% |
| RPM | $125.73 | +1.12% | 16.4B | 23.84 | $5.35 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
LOOP vs LIN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 225.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while LIN trades at $478.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check LIN's competition here
LOOP vs SHW Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SHW trades at $366.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SHW's competition here
LOOP vs ECL Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ECL trades at $278.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ECL's competition here
LOOP vs APD Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while APD trades at $294.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check APD's competition here
LOOP vs DD Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while DD trades at $76.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 454.88. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check DD's competition here
LOOP vs PPG Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while PPG trades at $112.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check PPG's competition here
LOOP vs LYB Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while LYB trades at $56.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 125.04. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check LYB's competition here
LOOP vs IFF Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while IFF trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check IFF's competition here
LOOP vs RPM Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while RPM trades at $125.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check RPM's competition here
LOOP vs WLK Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while WLK trades at $87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -174.38. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check WLK's competition here
LOOP vs ALB Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ALB trades at $81.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ALB's competition here
LOOP vs AVTR Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while AVTR trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check AVTR's competition here
LOOP vs EMN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while EMN trades at $68.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check EMN's competition here
LOOP vs NEU Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while NEU trades at $799.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check NEU's competition here
LOOP vs AXTA Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while AXTA trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check AXTA's competition here
LOOP vs SQM Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SQM trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SQM's competition here
LOOP vs ALTM Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ALTM's competition here
LOOP vs ESI Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ESI trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ESI's competition here
LOOP vs IKNX Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check IKNX's competition here
LOOP vs BCPC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while BCPC trades at $162.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check BCPC's competition here
LOOP vs SXT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SXT trades at $113.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SXT's competition here
LOOP vs CBT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CBT trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CBT's competition here
LOOP vs SSL Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SSL trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SSL's competition here
LOOP vs HWKN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while HWKN trades at $171.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check HWKN's competition here
LOOP vs AVNT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while AVNT trades at $37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check AVNT's competition here
LOOP vs FUL Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while FUL trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check FUL's competition here
LOOP vs WDFC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while WDFC trades at $220.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check WDFC's competition here
LOOP vs LTHM Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check LTHM's competition here
LOOP vs PRM Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while PRM trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check PRM's competition here
LOOP vs OLN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while OLN trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -210.59. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check OLN's competition here
LOOP vs ASH Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ASH trades at $56.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ASH's competition here
LOOP vs KWR Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while KWR trades at $144.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -344.98. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check KWR's competition here
LOOP vs CC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CC trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CC's competition here
LOOP vs IOSP Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while IOSP trades at $86.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 113.14. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check IOSP's competition here
LOOP vs NGVT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while NGVT trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check NGVT's competition here
LOOP vs MTX Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while MTX trades at $63.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 6384.00. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check MTX's competition here
LOOP vs PQG Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check PQG's competition here
LOOP vs CCF Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CCF's competition here
LOOP vs SCL Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SCL trades at $50.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SCL's competition here
LOOP vs ECVT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ECVT trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -76.58. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ECVT's competition here
LOOP vs REX Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while REX trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check REX's competition here
LOOP vs ODC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ODC trades at $58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ODC's competition here
LOOP vs KRO Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while KRO trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check KRO's competition here
LOOP vs OEC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while OEC trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check OEC's competition here
LOOP vs KOP Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while KOP trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check KOP's competition here
LOOP vs GPRE Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while GPRE trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check GPRE's competition here
LOOP vs HDSN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while HDSN trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check HDSN's competition here
LOOP vs GEVO Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while GEVO trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check GEVO's competition here
LOOP vs ADUR Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ADUR trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.93. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ADUR's competition here
LOOP vs LWLG Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while LWLG trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check LWLG's competition here
LOOP vs CMT Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CMT trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CMT's competition here
LOOP vs FSI Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while FSI trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check FSI's competition here
LOOP vs TSE Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while TSE trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check TSE's competition here
LOOP vs ALTO Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ALTO trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ALTO's competition here
LOOP vs NTIC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while NTIC trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check NTIC's competition here
LOOP vs VNTR Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check VNTR's competition here
LOOP vs SNES Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while SNES trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check SNES's competition here
LOOP vs GURE Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while GURE trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check GURE's competition here
LOOP vs CNEY Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CNEY trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CNEY's competition here
LOOP vs DNMR Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check DNMR's competition here
LOOP vs CRKN Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while CRKN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check CRKN's competition here
LOOP vs HGAS Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 726.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check HGAS's competition here
LOOP vs HGASW Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check HGASW's competition here
LOOP vs MOOV Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LOOP has daily volatility of 3.67 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LOOP vs FOE Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check FOE's competition here
LOOP vs GCP Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check GCP's competition here
LOOP vs AMRS Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check AMRS's competition here
LOOP vs AVTR-PA Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LOOP vs TREC Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check TREC's competition here
LOOP vs KRA Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check KRA's competition here
LOOP vs ZY Comparison August 2025
LOOP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOOP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOOP is priced at $1.51, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOOP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.25, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LOOP's ROE is +12.09%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOOP is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOOP.Check ZY's competition here