Linde plc
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LIN
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LIN
Linde plc (LIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $502.60 | +1.78% | 232.9B | 34.38 | $14.62 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $318.00 | -2.36% | 78.8B | 30.99 | $10.26 | +1.00% |
| ECL | $264.28 | -1.95% | 74.6B | 36.35 | $7.27 | +1.04% |
| APD | $293.55 | +1.42% | 65.4B | -198.34 | -$1.48 | +2.45% |
| LYB | $79.59 | +3.75% | 25.6B | -32.09 | -$2.48 | +6.03% |
| SQM | $83.21 | +1.70% | 23.8B | 40.39 | $2.06 | +0.14% |
| PPG | $103.24 | -3.03% | 23.1B | 14.92 | $6.92 | +2.72% |
| ALB | $178.09 | -0.21% | 21B | -30.92 | -$5.76 | +0.91% |
| DD | $45.47 | -1.60% | 19.1B | 216.52 | $0.21 | +1.63% |
| IFF | $72.43 | -0.19% | 18.5B | -51.37 | -$1.41 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SHW trades at $318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SHW's competition here
LIN vs ECL Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ECL trades at $264.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECL's competition here
LIN vs APD Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while APD trades at $293.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -198.34. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check APD's competition here
LIN vs LYB Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while LYB trades at $79.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -32.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LYB's competition here
LIN vs SQM Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SQM trades at $83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SQM's competition here
LIN vs PPG Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while PPG trades at $103.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PPG's competition here
LIN vs ALB Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ALB trades at $178.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -30.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALB's competition here
LIN vs DD Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while DD trades at $45.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 216.52. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DD's competition here
LIN vs IFF Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while IFF trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -51.37. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IFF's competition here
LIN vs WLK Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while WLK trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WLK's competition here
LIN vs RPM Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while RPM trades at $97.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check RPM's competition here
LIN vs SOLS Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SOLS trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SOLS's competition here
LIN vs EMN Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while EMN trades at $75.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check EMN's competition here
LIN vs ESI Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ESI trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ESI's competition here
LIN vs SSL Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SSL trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SSL's competition here
LIN vs ALTM Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTM's competition here
LIN vs NEU Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while NEU trades at $635.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NEU's competition here
LIN vs IKNX Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IKNX's competition here
LIN vs AXTA Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while AXTA trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AXTA's competition here
LIN vs BCPC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while BCPC trades at $170.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check BCPC's competition here
LIN vs CBT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CBT trades at $75.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CBT's competition here
LIN vs SXT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SXT trades at $92.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SXT's competition here
LIN vs PRM Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while PRM trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PRM's competition here
LIN vs FUL Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while FUL trades at $60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FUL's competition here
LIN vs OLN Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while OLN trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -32.47. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OLN's competition here
LIN vs CC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CC trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CC's competition here
LIN vs AVNT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while AVNT trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVNT's competition here
LIN vs HWKN Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while HWKN trades at $151.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HWKN's competition here
LIN vs LTHM Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LTHM's competition here
LIN vs WDFC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while WDFC trades at $206.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WDFC's competition here
LIN vs NGVT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while NGVT trades at $71.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -17.13. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NGVT's competition here
LIN vs ASH Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ASH trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ASH's competition here
LIN vs MTX Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while MTX trades at $69.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -117.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check MTX's competition here
LIN vs KWR Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while KWR trades at $120.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -861.21. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KWR's competition here
LIN vs PQG Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PQG's competition here
LIN vs IOSP Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while IOSP trades at $73.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IOSP's competition here
LIN vs REX Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while REX trades at $45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check REX's competition here
LIN vs ECVT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ECVT trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 260.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECVT's competition here
LIN vs CCF Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CCF's competition here
LIN vs GPRE Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while GPRE trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GPRE's competition here
LIN vs LWLG Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while LWLG trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -47.87. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LWLG's competition here
LIN vs SCL Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SCL trades at $49.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SCL's competition here
LIN vs ODC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 940.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ODC trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ODC's competition here
LIN vs KRO Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 732.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while KRO trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRO's competition here
LIN vs KOP Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 732.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while KOP trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KOP's competition here
LIN vs GEVO Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while GEVO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GEVO's competition here
LIN vs ALTO Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ALTO trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTO's competition here
LIN vs OEC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 356.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while OEC trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OEC's competition here
LIN vs ADUR Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ADUR trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ADUR's competition here
LIN vs HDSN Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while HDSN trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HDSN's competition here
LIN vs CMT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CMT trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CMT's competition here
LIN vs NTIC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while NTIC trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -264.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NTIC's competition here
LIN vs LOOP Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while LOOP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LOOP's competition here
LIN vs FSI Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while FSI trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FSI's competition here
LIN vs VNTR Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check VNTR's competition here
LIN vs GURE Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while GURE trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GURE's competition here
LIN vs SNES Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while SNES trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SNES's competition here
LIN vs YMAT Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while YMAT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check YMAT's competition here
LIN vs TSE Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TSE's competition here
LIN vs CNEY Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CNEY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CNEY's competition here
LIN vs DNMR Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DNMR's competition here
LIN vs CRKN Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CRKN's competition here
LIN vs HGAS Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 200.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGAS's competition here
LIN vs HGASW Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 7.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGASW's competition here
LIN vs MOOV Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.67 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LIN vs AMRS Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AMRS's competition here
LIN vs ARG Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ARG's competition here
LIN vs TREC Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TREC's competition here
LIN vs KMG Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KMG's competition here
LIN vs KRA Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRA's competition here
LIN vs ZY Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ZY's competition here
LIN vs GCP Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GCP's competition here
LIN vs FOE Comparison April 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 232.9B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $502.60, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.38, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FOE's competition here