Linde plc
Linde plc (LIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $494.31 | +0.86% | 231.8B | 33.98 | $14.61 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $360.20 | +0.72% | 89.4B | 35.11 | $10.27 | +0.88% |
| ECL | $301.86 | +0.29% | 86.3B | 41.73 | $7.29 | +0.88% |
| APD | $281.69 | +0.34% | 62.6B | -191.31 | -$1.47 | +2.54% |
| PPG | $125.13 | +0.71% | 28.4B | 18.29 | $6.92 | +2.22% |
| DD | $49.53 | -1.41% | 21.1B | 239.98 | $0.21 | +1.41% |
| IFF | $81.57 | -0.06% | 20.8B | -55.75 | -$1.46 | +1.98% |
| SQM | $71.58 | -0.72% | 20.5B | -39.05 | -$1.84 | +0.17% |
| ALB | $172.20 | +2.25% | 19.8B | -29.24 | -$5.76 | +0.96% |
| LYB | $56.56 | +2.22% | 18.2B | -14.24 | -$3.98 | +9.67% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SHW trades at $360.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SHW's competition here
LIN vs ECL Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ECL trades at $301.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECL's competition here
LIN vs APD Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while APD trades at $281.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -191.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check APD's competition here
LIN vs PPG Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while PPG trades at $125.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PPG's competition here
LIN vs DD Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while DD trades at $49.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 239.98. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DD's competition here
LIN vs IFF Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while IFF trades at $81.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IFF's competition here
LIN vs SQM Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SQM trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SQM's competition here
LIN vs ALB Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ALB trades at $172.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALB's competition here
LIN vs LYB Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while LYB trades at $56.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LYB's competition here
LIN vs RPM Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while RPM trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check RPM's competition here
LIN vs SOLS Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SOLS trades at $78.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SOLS's competition here
LIN vs WLK Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while WLK trades at $92.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WLK's competition here
LIN vs EMN Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while EMN trades at $76.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check EMN's competition here
LIN vs ESI Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ESI trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ESI's competition here
LIN vs AXTA Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while AXTA trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AXTA's competition here
LIN vs ALTM Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTM's competition here
LIN vs IKNX Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IKNX's competition here
LIN vs NEU Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while NEU trades at $601.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NEU's competition here
LIN vs SSL Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SSL trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SSL's competition here
LIN vs BCPC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while BCPC trades at $173.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check BCPC's competition here
LIN vs CBT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CBT trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CBT's competition here
LIN vs PRM Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while PRM trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PRM's competition here
LIN vs AVNT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while AVNT trades at $41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVNT's competition here
LIN vs SXT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SXT trades at $91.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SXT's competition here
LIN vs FUL Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while FUL trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FUL's competition here
LIN vs WDFC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while WDFC trades at $237.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check WDFC's competition here
LIN vs HWKN Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while HWKN trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 37.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HWKN's competition here
LIN vs KWR Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while KWR trades at $167.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -335.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KWR's competition here
LIN vs LTHM Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LTHM's competition here
LIN vs ASH Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ASH trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ASH's competition here
LIN vs OLN Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while OLN trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OLN's competition here
LIN vs NGVT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while NGVT trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NGVT's competition here
LIN vs CC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CC trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CC's competition here
LIN vs MTX Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while MTX trades at $69.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -122.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check MTX's competition here
LIN vs IOSP Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while IOSP trades at $78.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is -2030.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check IOSP's competition here
LIN vs PQG Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check PQG's competition here
LIN vs SCL Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SCL trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SCL's competition here
LIN vs ECVT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ECVT trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -42.91. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ECVT's competition here
LIN vs CCF Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CCF's competition here
LIN vs REX Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while REX trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check REX's competition here
LIN vs GPRE Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while GPRE trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GPRE's competition here
LIN vs ODC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ODC trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ODC's competition here
LIN vs KRO Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 702.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while KRO trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRO's competition here
LIN vs KOP Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 688.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while KOP trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KOP's competition here
LIN vs LWLG Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while LWLG trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LWLG's competition here
LIN vs GEVO Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while GEVO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GEVO's competition here
LIN vs ADUR Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ADUR trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ADUR's competition here
LIN vs OEC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while OEC trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check OEC's competition here
LIN vs HDSN Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while HDSN trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HDSN's competition here
LIN vs ALTO Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ALTO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ALTO's competition here
LIN vs CMT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CMT trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CMT's competition here
LIN vs NTIC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while NTIC trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -302.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check NTIC's competition here
LIN vs FSI Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while FSI trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FSI's competition here
LIN vs LOOP Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while LOOP trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check LOOP's competition here
LIN vs VNTR Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check VNTR's competition here
LIN vs SNES Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while SNES trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check SNES's competition here
LIN vs TSE Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while TSE trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TSE's competition here
LIN vs GURE Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while GURE trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GURE's competition here
LIN vs YMAT Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while YMAT trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check YMAT's competition here
LIN vs CNEY Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CNEY trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CNEY's competition here
LIN vs DNMR Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check DNMR's competition here
LIN vs CRKN Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check CRKN's competition here
LIN vs HGAS Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 172.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGAS's competition here
LIN vs HGASW Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check HGASW's competition here
LIN vs MOOV Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.28 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
LIN vs FOE Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check FOE's competition here
LIN vs TREC Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check TREC's competition here
LIN vs ZY Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check ZY's competition here
LIN vs GCP Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check GCP's competition here
LIN vs AMRS Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check AMRS's competition here
LIN vs KRA Comparison February 2026
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 231.8B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $494.31, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.98, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.Check KRA's competition here