Linde plc
Linde plc LIN Peers
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $475.94 | +1.44% | 224.4B | 34.57 | $13.79 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $352.06 | +2.53% | 89B | 33.62 | $10.57 | +0.85% |
| ECL | $270.85 | +0.52% | 77.3B | 37.14 | $7.34 | +0.92% |
| APD | $286.43 | +1.55% | 63.5B | 41.05 | $6.95 | +2.49% |
| DD | $71.66 | +4.48% | 29.9B | 2382.17 | $0.03 | +2.21% |
| PPG | $116.62 | +2.52% | 26.4B | 20.60 | $5.65 | +2.33% |
| LYB | $61.19 | +5.76% | 19.7B | 21.18 | $2.89 | +8.79% |
| IFF | $74.86 | +1.78% | 19.2B | -23.04 | -$3.26 | +2.13% |
| RPM | $112.04 | +2.00% | 14.4B | 22.54 | $4.99 | +1.76% |
| WLK | $80.33 | +5.79% | 10.3B | 26.92 | $2.99 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SHW trades at $352.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ECL trades at $270.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs APD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while APD trades at $286.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs DD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while DD trades at $71.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2382.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PPG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while PPG trades at $116.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LYB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while LYB trades at $61.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IFF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while IFF trades at $74.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs RPM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while RPM trades at $112.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WLK Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while WLK trades at $80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SQM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SQM trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while AVTR trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs EMN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while EMN trades at $78.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ALB trades at $64.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AXTA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while AXTA trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NEU Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while NEU trades at $704.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IKNX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ESI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ESI trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs BCPC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while BCPC trades at $161.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SXT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SXT trades at $101.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CBT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CBT trades at $77.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FUL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while FUL trades at $61.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WDFC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while WDFC trades at $231.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVNT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while AVNT trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HWKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while HWKN trades at $143.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SSL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SSL trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LTHM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OLN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while OLN trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ASH Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ASH trades at $52.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.93. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IOSP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while IOSP trades at $86.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 80.62. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KWR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while KWR trades at $120.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PRM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while PRM trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PQG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CC trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 68.53. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MTX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while MTX trades at $57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -73.81. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NGVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while NGVT trades at $45.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SCL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SCL trades at $57.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CCF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 891.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ECVT trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -75.90. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs REX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 817.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while REX trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ODC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 799.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ODC trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KRO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while KRO trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 664.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while KOP trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OEC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while OEC trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GPRE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while GPRE trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HDSN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 359.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while HDSN trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GEVO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while GEVO trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ADUR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 265.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ADUR trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -31.28. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CMT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CMT trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LWLG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while LWLG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TSE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while TSE trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ALTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NTIC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while NTIC trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LOOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while LOOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FSI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while FSI trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs VNTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GURE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while GURE trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SNES Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while SNES trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CNEY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CNEY trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CRKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while CRKN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs DNMR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGAS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 660.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while HGAS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGASW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MOOV Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 0.65 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
LIN vs ZY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TREC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KRA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GCP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FOE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AMRS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 224.4B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $475.94, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.57, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.