Linde plc
Linde plc LIN Peers
See (LIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $472.02 | +0.34% | 222.2B | 34.30 | $13.76 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $340.07 | -0.36% | 85.2B | 32.14 | $10.58 | +0.89% |
| ECL | $270.55 | +0.91% | 76.7B | 36.81 | $7.35 | +0.93% |
| APD | $298.13 | +1.50% | 66.3B | 43.00 | $6.93 | +2.40% |
| DD | $77.54 | +2.09% | 32.5B | 2585.67 | $0.03 | +2.05% |
| PPG | $115.40 | +0.77% | 26.2B | 20.39 | $5.66 | +2.37% |
| LYB | $65.41 | +4.41% | 21B | 22.64 | $2.89 | +8.19% |
| IFF | $76.94 | +0.90% | 19.7B | -23.61 | -$3.26 | +2.08% |
| RPM | $111.91 | +0.85% | 14.4B | 22.42 | $4.99 | +1.83% |
| WLK | $85.68 | +4.48% | 11B | 28.68 | $2.99 | +2.44% |
Stock Comparison
LIN vs SHW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SHW trades at $340.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ECL trades at $270.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs APD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while APD trades at $298.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs DD Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while DD trades at $77.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2585.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PPG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while PPG trades at $115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LYB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while LYB trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IFF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while IFF trades at $76.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.61. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs RPM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while RPM trades at $111.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WLK Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while WLK trades at $85.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SQM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SQM trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALB Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ALB trades at $83.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs EMN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while EMN trades at $79.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while AVTR trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NEU Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while NEU trades at $726.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AXTA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while AXTA trades at $29.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ESI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ESI trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IKNX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs BCPC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while BCPC trades at $152.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SXT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SXT trades at $107.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CBT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CBT trades at $77.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HWKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while HWKN trades at $161.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FUL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while FUL trades at $60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SSL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SSL trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVNT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while AVNT trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LTHM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs WDFC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while WDFC trades at $217.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PRM Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while PRM trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OLN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while OLN trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ASH Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ASH trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KWR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while KWR trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs IOSP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while IOSP trades at $84.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 78.46. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CC trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 77.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs PQG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MTX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while MTX trades at $59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -77.08. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NGVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while NGVT trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SCL Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SCL trades at $57.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CCF Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ECVT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ECVT trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -88.25. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs REX Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 890.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while REX trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ODC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 821.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ODC trades at $60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KRO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 713.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while KRO trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs KOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 660.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while KOP trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs OEC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while OEC trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GPRE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while GPRE trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GEVO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while GEVO trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HDSN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while HDSN trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ADUR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ADUR trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LWLG Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while LWLG trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CMT Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CMT trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TSE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while TSE trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ALTO Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ALTO trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs NTIC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while NTIC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FSI Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while FSI trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs LOOP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while LOOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs VNTR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs SNES Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while SNES trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GURE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while GURE trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CNEY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CNEY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs CRKN Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while CRKN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs DNMR Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGAS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 777.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while HGAS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs HGASW Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs MOOV Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LIN has daily volatility of 1.58 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
LIN vs KRA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs TREC Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AMRS Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs AVTR-PA Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs FOE Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs GCP Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.
LIN vs ZY Comparison
LIN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIN stands at 222.2B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIN is priced at $472.02, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.30, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LIN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIN.