i3 Verticals, Inc.

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while MSFT trades at $409.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check MSFT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 545.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ORCL trades at $195.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ORCL's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PLTR trades at $133.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 146.12. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PLTR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PANW trades at $236.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 125.85. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PANW's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CRWD trades at $579.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -852.38. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CRWD's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SNPS trades at $510.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 78.23. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SNPS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ADBE trades at $235.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ADBE's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FTNT trades at $120.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 45.62. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FTNT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NET trades at $198.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -770.76. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NET's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check VMW's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CRWV trades at $113.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.92. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CRWV's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SQ's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while XYZ trades at $71.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 54.53. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check XYZ's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NETE's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while VRSN trades at $294.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check VRSN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SPLK's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ZS trades at $154.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -354.49. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ZS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while MDB trades at $301.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -344.32. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check MDB's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while AKAM trades at $153.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 54.62. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check AKAM's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FLT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CPAY trades at $328.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CPAY's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while AFRM trades at $65.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 57.75. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check AFRM's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CYBR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FFIV trades at $359.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FFIV's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while KSPI trades at $88.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check KSPI's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while DOCN trades at $153.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check DOCN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while IOT trades at $27.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1376.50. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check IOT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NLOK's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GEN trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV and GEN have similar daily volatility (2.85).Check GEN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while OKTA trades at $81.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 59.69. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check OKTA's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PAYP trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PAYP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while TOST trades at $23.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check TOST's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while RBRK trades at $62.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check RBRK's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CHKP trades at $119.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CHKP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NTNX trades at $44.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NTNX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GDDY trades at $84.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check GDDY's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CFLT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ALTR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PLAN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CORZ trades at $24.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CORZ's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CORZZ trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CORZZ's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check INFA's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check HCP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check JCOM's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while DBX trades at $25.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check DBX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SAIL trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SAIL's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SQSP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while DOX trades at $61.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check DOX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while BLSH trades at $40.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check BLSH's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NEWR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CCCS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CORZW trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CORZW's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while S trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas S's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check S's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while KLAR trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check KLAR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PATH trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PATH's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while RELY trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check RELY's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NVEI's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while WEX trades at $134.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check WEX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while KVYO trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -475.17. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check KVYO's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ACIW trades at $40.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ACIW's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ESMT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FOUR trades at $41.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FOUR's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while BB trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 67.72. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check BB's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while DLO trades at $12.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check DLO's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while BOX trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check BOX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SWI's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while VRNS trades at $27.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check VRNS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while TDC trades at $33.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check TDC's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while QLYS trades at $86.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check QLYS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while WIX trades at $52.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 62.86. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check WIX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CLBT trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CLBT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check EVOP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while NTCT trades at $39.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check NTCT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while EEFT trades at $68.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check EEFT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while STNE trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check STNE's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PAGS trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PAGS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CCC trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CCC's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while WRD trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check WRD's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while CSGS trades at $79.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check CSGS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while TENB trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -205.80. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check TENB's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check AVDX's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check GETVV's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while AVPT trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check AVPT's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ATEN trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 45.48. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ATEN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FORG's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check GSKY's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SPSC trades at $49.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SPSC's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while RAMP trades at $28.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check RAMP's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check GET's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while EVCM trades at $9.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check EVCM's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PAYO trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PAYO's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while MQ trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 388.00. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check MQ's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check STER's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while BAND trades at $52.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -134.24. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check BAND's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while FIVN trades at $21.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check FIVN's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check ZUO's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while PICS trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check PICS's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check SUMO's competition here

IIIV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IIIV stands at 417.2M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIV is priced at $18.95, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IIIV currently has a P/E ratio of 171.68, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, IIIV's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIV is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIV.Check GB's competition here