International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. IFF Peers
See (IFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFF | $76.31 | +3.92% | 19.52B | -23.41 | -$3.26 | +2.10% |
| LIN | $454.42 | +0.39% | 213.91B | 33.02 | $13.76 | +1.25% |
| SHW | $362.32 | +1.98% | 91.07B | 34.34 | $10.55 | +0.82% |
| ECL | $254.47 | +0.71% | 72.15B | 34.62 | $7.35 | +0.96% |
| APD | $276.09 | +1.83% | 61.44B | 39.84 | $6.93 | +2.57% |
| DD | $71.27 | +6.74% | 29.83B | 2375.67 | $0.03 | +2.16% |
| PPG | $114.19 | +4.34% | 25.92B | 20.21 | $5.65 | +2.38% |
| LYB | $60.69 | +6.60% | 19.51B | 21.00 | $2.89 | +8.82% |
| RPM | $114.33 | +3.44% | 14.68B | 22.91 | $4.99 | +1.73% |
| WLK | $85.69 | +7.11% | 10.99B | 28.66 | $2.99 | +2.42% |
Stock Comparison
IFF vs LIN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 213.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while LIN trades at $454.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SHW Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SHW trades at $362.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ECL Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 72.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ECL trades at $254.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs APD Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 61.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while APD trades at $276.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs DD Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.83B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while DD trades at $71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2375.67. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs PPG Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.92B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while PPG trades at $114.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs LYB Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while LYB trades at $60.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs RPM Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while RPM trades at $114.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs WLK Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while WLK trades at $85.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SQM Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 10.11B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SQM trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs EMN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while EMN trades at $82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs AVTR Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while AVTR trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ALB Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ALB trades at $61.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs AXTA Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while AXTA trades at $32.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ALTM Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs NEU Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while NEU trades at $637.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs IKNX Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ESI Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ESI trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs BCPC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while BCPC trades at $165.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CBT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CBT trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SXT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SXT trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs AVNT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while AVNT trades at $39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs WDFC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while WDFC trades at $237.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs FUL Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while FUL trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs LTHM Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs OLN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while OLN trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs HWKN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while HWKN trades at $117.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ASH Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ASH trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SSL Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SSL trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF and SSL have similar daily volatility (1.61).
IFF vs IOSP Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while IOSP trades at $90.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 63.87. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs KWR Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while KWR trades at $109.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs PQG Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs MTX Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while MTX trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -74.79. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CC trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 66.56. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs PRM Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while PRM trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -295.75. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs NGVT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while NGVT trades at $43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SCL Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SCL trades at $55.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CCF Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs KRO Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 869.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while KRO trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ECVT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 864.07M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ECVT trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -73.60. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs REX Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 687.23M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while REX trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ODC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 632.11M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ODC trades at $46.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs KOP Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 604.48M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while KOP trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs OEC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 602.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while OEC trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs HDSN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 339.49M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while HDSN trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs GPRE Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 304.11M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while GPRE trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs GEVO Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 285.14M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while GEVO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ADUR Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 184.81M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ADUR trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CMT Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 143.50M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CMT trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs LWLG Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 132.08M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while LWLG trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs TSE Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 90.20M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while TSE trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs NTIC Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.64M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while NTIC trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs ALTO Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 66.70M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while ALTO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs FSI Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 54.64M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while FSI trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs LOOP Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 46.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while LOOP trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs VNTR Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs GURE Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.59M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while GURE trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs SNES Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while SNES trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CRKN Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CRKN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs CNEY Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while CNEY trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs DNMR Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs HGAS Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while HGAS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs HGASW Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFF is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFF.
IFF vs MOOV Comparison
IFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFF stands at 19.52B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, IFF is priced at $76.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFF currently has a P/E ratio of -23.41, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IFF has daily volatility of 1.61 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.