Hawkins, Inc.
Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HWKN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWKN | $144.71 | -0.16% | 3.1B | 37.09 | $3.95 | +0.51% |
| LIN | $500.06 | +2.03% | 231.8B | 33.98 | $14.61 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $365.02 | +2.07% | 89.4B | 35.11 | $10.27 | +0.88% |
| ECL | $305.65 | +1.54% | 86.3B | 41.73 | $7.29 | +0.88% |
| APD | $283.27 | +0.91% | 62.6B | -191.31 | -$1.47 | +2.54% |
| PPG | $125.72 | +1.18% | 28.4B | 18.29 | $6.92 | +2.22% |
| DD | $49.94 | -0.60% | 21.1B | 239.98 | $0.21 | +1.41% |
| IFF | $81.22 | -0.49% | 20.8B | -55.75 | -$1.46 | +1.98% |
| SQM | $72.74 | +0.89% | 20.5B | -39.05 | -$1.84 | +0.17% |
| ALB | $175.38 | +4.14% | 19.8B | -29.24 | -$5.76 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
HWKN vs LIN Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while LIN trades at $500.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LIN's competition here
HWKN vs SHW Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SHW trades at $365.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SHW's competition here
HWKN vs ECL Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ECL trades at $305.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ECL's competition here
HWKN vs APD Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while APD trades at $283.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -191.31. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check APD's competition here
HWKN vs PPG Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while PPG trades at $125.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PPG's competition here
HWKN vs DD Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while DD trades at $49.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 239.98. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check DD's competition here
HWKN vs IFF Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while IFF trades at $81.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IFF's competition here
HWKN vs SQM Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SQM trades at $72.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SQM's competition here
HWKN vs ALB Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ALB trades at $175.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALB's competition here
HWKN vs LYB Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while LYB trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LYB's competition here
HWKN vs RPM Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while RPM trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check RPM's competition here
HWKN vs SOLS Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SOLS trades at $78.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SOLS's competition here
HWKN vs WLK Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while WLK trades at $93.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check WLK's competition here
HWKN vs EMN Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while EMN trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check EMN's competition here
HWKN vs ESI Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ESI trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ESI's competition here
HWKN vs AXTA Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while AXTA trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AXTA's competition here
HWKN vs ALTM Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALTM's competition here
HWKN vs IKNX Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IKNX's competition here
HWKN vs NEU Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while NEU trades at $606.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NEU's competition here
HWKN vs SSL Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SSL trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SSL's competition here
HWKN vs BCPC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while BCPC trades at $177.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check BCPC's competition here
HWKN vs CBT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CBT trades at $74.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CBT's competition here
HWKN vs PRM Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while PRM trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PRM's competition here
HWKN vs AVNT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while AVNT trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AVNT's competition here
HWKN vs SXT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SXT trades at $92.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SXT's competition here
HWKN vs FUL Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while FUL trades at $65.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FUL's competition here
HWKN vs WDFC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while WDFC trades at $242.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check WDFC's competition here
HWKN vs KWR Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while KWR trades at $170.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -335.33. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KWR's competition here
HWKN vs LTHM Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LTHM's competition here
HWKN vs ASH Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ASH trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ASH's competition here
HWKN vs OLN Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while OLN trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -65.82. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check OLN's competition here
HWKN vs NGVT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while NGVT trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NGVT's competition here
HWKN vs CC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CC trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CC's competition here
HWKN vs MTX Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while MTX trades at $70.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -122.08. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check MTX's competition here
HWKN vs IOSP Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while IOSP trades at $79.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is -2030.50. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check IOSP's competition here
HWKN vs PQG Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check PQG's competition here
HWKN vs SCL Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SCL trades at $54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SCL's competition here
HWKN vs ECVT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ECVT trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -42.91. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ECVT's competition here
HWKN vs CCF Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CCF's competition here
HWKN vs REX Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while REX trades at $33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check REX's competition here
HWKN vs GPRE Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while GPRE trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GPRE's competition here
HWKN vs ODC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 888.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ODC trades at $63.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ODC's competition here
HWKN vs KRO Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 702.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while KRO trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KRO's competition here
HWKN vs KOP Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 688.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while KOP trades at $33.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KOP's competition here
HWKN vs LWLG Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while LWLG trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LWLG's competition here
HWKN vs GEVO Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while GEVO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GEVO's competition here
HWKN vs ADUR Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ADUR trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ADUR's competition here
HWKN vs OEC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while OEC trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check OEC's competition here
HWKN vs HDSN Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while HDSN trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check HDSN's competition here
HWKN vs ALTO Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ALTO trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ALTO's competition here
HWKN vs CMT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CMT trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CMT's competition here
HWKN vs NTIC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while NTIC trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -302.00. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check NTIC's competition here
HWKN vs FSI Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while FSI trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FSI's competition here
HWKN vs LOOP Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while LOOP trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check LOOP's competition here
HWKN vs VNTR Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check VNTR's competition here
HWKN vs SNES Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while SNES trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check SNES's competition here
HWKN vs TSE Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while TSE trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check TSE's competition here
HWKN vs GURE Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while GURE trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GURE's competition here
HWKN vs YMAT Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while YMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check YMAT's competition here
HWKN vs CNEY Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CNEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CNEY's competition here
HWKN vs DNMR Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check DNMR's competition here
HWKN vs CRKN Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check CRKN's competition here
HWKN vs HGAS Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 172.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check HGAS's competition here
HWKN vs HGASW Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check HGASW's competition here
HWKN vs MOOV Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HWKN has daily volatility of 2.35 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
HWKN vs AVTR-PA Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
HWKN vs KRA Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check KRA's competition here
HWKN vs FOE Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check FOE's competition here
HWKN vs TREC Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check TREC's competition here
HWKN vs ZY Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check ZY's competition here
HWKN vs GCP Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check GCP's competition here
HWKN vs AMRS Comparison February 2026
HWKN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HWKN stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HWKN is priced at $144.71, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HWKN currently has a P/E ratio of 37.09, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HWKN's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HWKN is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HWKN.Check AMRS's competition here