Global Gas Corporation
Global Gas Corporation HGASW Peers
See (HGASW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGASW | $0.00 | -66.67% | 10.5K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LIN | $472.71 | +0.52% | 222.5B | 34.30 | $13.78 | +1.22% |
| SHW | $357.42 | -0.13% | 89.6B | 34.20 | $10.45 | +0.84% |
| ECL | $267.11 | +0.07% | 75.7B | 36.39 | $7.34 | +0.91% |
| APD | $279.80 | +1.30% | 62.3B | 40.32 | $6.94 | +2.54% |
| DD | $68.11 | +1.04% | 28.5B | 2270.33 | $0.03 | +2.32% |
| PPG | $112.60 | +1.20% | 25.6B | 19.93 | $5.65 | +2.41% |
| IFF | $76.90 | +0.58% | 19.7B | -23.59 | -$3.26 | +2.08% |
| LYB | $56.53 | +1.67% | 18.2B | 19.56 | $2.89 | +9.57% |
| RPM | $115.49 | +0.75% | 14.8B | 23.14 | $4.99 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
HGASW vs LIN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 222.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while LIN trades at $472.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SHW Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SHW trades at $357.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ECL Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ECL trades at $267.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs APD Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while APD trades at $279.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs DD Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while DD trades at $68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2270.33. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs PPG Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while PPG trades at $112.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs IFF Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while IFF trades at $76.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.59. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs LYB Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while LYB trades at $56.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs RPM Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while RPM trades at $115.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs WLK Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while WLK trades at $73.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs EMN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while EMN trades at $78.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs AVTR Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while AVTR trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SQM Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SQM trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ALB Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ALB trades at $59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs AXTA Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while AXTA trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ALTM Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs NEU Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while NEU trades at $644.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs IKNX Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs BCPC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while BCPC trades at $166.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ESI Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ESI trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SXT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SXT trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CBT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CBT trades at $75.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs AVNT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while AVNT trades at $37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs WDFC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while WDFC trades at $245.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs FUL Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while FUL trades at $56.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs LTHM Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SSL Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SSL trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs HWKN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while HWKN trades at $135.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs OLN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while OLN trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ASH Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ASH trades at $50.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs IOSP Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while IOSP trades at $86.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 79.75. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs KWR Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while KWR trades at $109.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs PQG Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs PRM Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while PRM trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs MTX Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while MTX trades at $57.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -73.04. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CC trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs NGVT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while NGVT trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SCL Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SCL trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CCF Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ECVT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 938.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ECVT trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -79.95. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs KRO Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 759.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while KRO trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ODC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 740.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ODC trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs REX Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while REX trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs KOP Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while KOP trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs OEC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 635.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while OEC trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs HDSN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 310.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while HDSN trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ADUR Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ADUR trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -34.48. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs GEVO Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while GEVO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs GPRE Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 272.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while GPRE trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CMT Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CMT trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs LWLG Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while LWLG trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs TSE Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while TSE trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs LOOP Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while LOOP trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -7.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ALTO Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ALTO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs NTIC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while NTIC trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs FSI Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while FSI trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs VNTR Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CNEY Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CNEY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs GURE Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while GURE trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs SNES Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while SNES trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs CRKN Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while CRKN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs DNMR Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs HGAS Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while HGAS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW and HGAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
HGASW vs MOOV Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HGASW has daily volatility of 0.00 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.
HGASW vs FOE Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs TREC Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs ZY Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs AVTR-PA Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs AMRS Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs GCP Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.
HGASW vs KRA Comparison
HGASW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HGASW stands at 10.5K. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HGASW is priced at $0.00, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HGASW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, HGASW's ROE is +1.17%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HGASW is less volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGASW.