Gulf Resources, Inc.
Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GURE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GURE | $0.66 | -1.89% | 8.8M | -0.12 | -$5.52 | N/A |
| LIN | $466.97 | -0.96% | 222.6B | 34.34 | $13.77 | +1.22% |
| SHW | $335.48 | -1.39% | 85.2B | 33.74 | $10.08 | +0.89% |
| ECL | $269.85 | +0.01% | 77.1B | 36.94 | $7.36 | +0.93% |
| APD | $295.17 | -0.69% | 66.6B | 43.18 | $6.93 | +2.38% |
| DD | $74.87 | +0.09% | 31.7B | 2526.33 | $0.03 | +2.09% |
| PPG | $114.18 | -0.73% | 26.3B | 20.53 | $5.65 | +2.35% |
| LYB | $62.66 | +3.23% | 20.6B | 22.15 | $2.89 | +8.44% |
| IFF | $75.16 | -0.95% | 19.6B | -23.51 | -$3.26 | +2.09% |
| RPM | $121.44 | -0.98% | 15.8B | 22.93 | $5.35 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
GURE vs LIN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while LIN trades at $466.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check LIN's competition here
GURE vs SHW Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SHW trades at $335.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SHW's competition here
GURE vs ECL Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ECL trades at $269.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ECL's competition here
GURE vs APD Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while APD trades at $295.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check APD's competition here
GURE vs DD Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while DD trades at $74.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2526.33. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check DD's competition here
GURE vs PPG Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while PPG trades at $114.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check PPG's competition here
GURE vs LYB Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while LYB trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check LYB's competition here
GURE vs IFF Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while IFF trades at $75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check IFF's competition here
GURE vs RPM Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while RPM trades at $121.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check RPM's competition here
GURE vs SQM Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SQM trades at $39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SQM's competition here
GURE vs WLK Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while WLK trades at $86.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check WLK's competition here
GURE vs ALB Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ALB trades at $74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ALB's competition here
GURE vs AVTR Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while AVTR trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check AVTR's competition here
GURE vs EMN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while EMN trades at $76.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check EMN's competition here
GURE vs NEU Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while NEU trades at $692.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check NEU's competition here
GURE vs AXTA Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while AXTA trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check AXTA's competition here
GURE vs ALTM Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ALTM's competition here
GURE vs IKNX Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check IKNX's competition here
GURE vs ESI Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ESI trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ESI's competition here
GURE vs BCPC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while BCPC trades at $149.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check BCPC's competition here
GURE vs SXT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SXT trades at $113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SXT's competition here
GURE vs CBT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CBT trades at $75.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CBT's competition here
GURE vs HWKN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while HWKN trades at $162.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check HWKN's competition here
GURE vs SSL Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SSL trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SSL's competition here
GURE vs FUL Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while FUL trades at $58.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check FUL's competition here
GURE vs AVNT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while AVNT trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE and AVNT have similar daily volatility (2.16).Check AVNT's competition here
GURE vs LTHM Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check LTHM's competition here
GURE vs WDFC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while WDFC trades at $210.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check WDFC's competition here
GURE vs PRM Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while PRM trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check PRM's competition here
GURE vs OLN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while OLN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check OLN's competition here
GURE vs ASH Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ASH trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ASH's competition here
GURE vs KWR Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while KWR trades at $118.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check KWR's competition here
GURE vs CC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CC trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 78.72. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CC's competition here
GURE vs IOSP Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while IOSP trades at $83.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 78.13. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check IOSP's competition here
GURE vs MTX Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while MTX trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check MTX's competition here
GURE vs PQG Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check PQG's competition here
GURE vs NGVT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while NGVT trades at $45.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check NGVT's competition here
GURE vs SCL Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SCL trades at $56.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SCL's competition here
GURE vs CCF Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CCF's competition here
GURE vs ECVT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ECVT trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -89.95. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ECVT's competition here
GURE vs REX Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while REX trades at $54.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check REX's competition here
GURE vs ODC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 803.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ODC trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ODC's competition here
GURE vs KRO Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 706.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while KRO trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check KRO's competition here
GURE vs KOP Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 691.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while KOP trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check KOP's competition here
GURE vs OEC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while OEC trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check OEC's competition here
GURE vs GPRE Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 542.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while GPRE trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check GPRE's competition here
GURE vs HDSN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while HDSN trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check HDSN's competition here
GURE vs GEVO Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while GEVO trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check GEVO's competition here
GURE vs LWLG Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while LWLG trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check LWLG's competition here
GURE vs ADUR Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ADUR trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ADUR's competition here
GURE vs CMT Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CMT trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CMT's competition here
GURE vs TSE Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while TSE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check TSE's competition here
GURE vs ALTO Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ALTO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ALTO's competition here
GURE vs NTIC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while NTIC trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check NTIC's competition here
GURE vs LOOP Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while LOOP trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check LOOP's competition here
GURE vs FSI Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while FSI trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check FSI's competition here
GURE vs VNTR Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check VNTR's competition here
GURE vs SNES Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while SNES trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check SNES's competition here
GURE vs CNEY Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CNEY trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CNEY's competition here
GURE vs CRKN Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while CRKN trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check CRKN's competition here
GURE vs DNMR Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check DNMR's competition here
GURE vs HGAS Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 725.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check HGAS's competition here
GURE vs HGASW Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check HGASW's competition here
GURE vs MOOV Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GURE has daily volatility of 2.16 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
GURE vs GCP Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check GCP's competition here
GURE vs TREC Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check TREC's competition here
GURE vs ZY Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check ZY's competition here
GURE vs AMRS Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check AMRS's competition here
GURE vs AVTR-PA Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
GURE vs FOE Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check FOE's competition here
GURE vs KRA Comparison July 2025
GURE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GURE stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GURE is priced at $0.66, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GURE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.12, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, GURE's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GURE is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GURE.Check KRA's competition here