Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
Flexible Solutions International, Inc. FSI Peers
See (FSI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSI | $4.20 | -4.55% | 53.12M | 17.50 | $0.24 | +2.37% |
| LIN | $460.33 | +0.56% | 216.69B | 33.41 | $13.78 | +1.23% |
| SHW | $362.32 | +1.98% | 91.07B | 34.34 | $10.55 | +0.83% |
| ECL | $261.36 | +0.88% | 74.10B | 35.51 | $7.36 | +0.94% |
| APD | $277.40 | -0.55% | 61.73B | 39.91 | $6.95 | +2.56% |
| DD | $68.91 | -0.59% | 28.84B | 2297.08 | $0.03 | +2.25% |
| PPG | $114.28 | +0.18% | 25.94B | 20.23 | $5.65 | +2.38% |
| IFF | $77.31 | -0.53% | 19.78B | -23.71 | -$3.26 | +2.07% |
| LYB | $59.18 | -0.99% | 19.02B | 20.48 | $2.89 | +9.08% |
| RPM | $116.06 | +0.03% | 14.90B | 23.26 | $4.99 | +1.73% |
Stock Comparison
FSI vs LIN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 216.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while LIN trades at $460.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SHW Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SHW trades at $362.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ECL Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 74.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ECL trades at $261.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs APD Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 61.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while APD trades at $277.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs DD Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 28.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while DD trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2297.08. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs PPG Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.94B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while PPG trades at $114.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs IFF Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while IFF trades at $77.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.71. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs LYB Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while LYB trades at $59.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs RPM Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while RPM trades at $116.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs WLK Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while WLK trades at $79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SQM Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SQM trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs EMN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while EMN trades at $82.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs AVTR Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while AVTR trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs AXTA Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while AXTA trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ALB Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ALB trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ALTM Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs NEU Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while NEU trades at $650.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs IKNX Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs BCPC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while BCPC trades at $169.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ESI Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ESI trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CBT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CBT trades at $75.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SXT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SXT trades at $94.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs AVNT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while AVNT trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs WDFC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while WDFC trades at $246.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs FUL Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while FUL trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs LTHM Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs HWKN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while HWKN trades at $125.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SSL Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SSL trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ASH Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ASH trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs OLN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while OLN trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs IOSP Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while IOSP trades at $89.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 82.52. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs PQG Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs KWR Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while KWR trades at $105.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs MTX Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while MTX trades at $58.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -75.38. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs PRM Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while PRM trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CC trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 62.11. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs NGVT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while NGVT trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SCL Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SCL trades at $55.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CCF Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ECVT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 849.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ECVT trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -72.40. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs KRO Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 811.00M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while KRO trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs REX Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 699.03M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while REX trades at $42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ODC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 651.79M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ODC trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs KOP Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 628.12M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while KOP trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs OEC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 625.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while OEC trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs HDSN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 337.41M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while HDSN trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs GPRE Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 313.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while GPRE trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs GEVO Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 282.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while GEVO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ADUR Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 207.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ADUR trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -25.29. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs LWLG Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 166.30M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while LWLG trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CMT Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 141.18M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CMT trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs TSE Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 99.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while TSE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs NTIC Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while NTIC trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs ALTO Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 66.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while ALTO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs LOOP Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 46.19M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while LOOP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs VNTR Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs GURE Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while GURE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs SNES Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.74M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while SNES trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CRKN Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CRKN trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs HGAS Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while HGAS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs DNMR Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs CNEY Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 828033.00. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while CNEY trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs HGASW Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.
FSI vs MOOV Comparison
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 53.12M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $4.20, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 17.50, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FSI has daily volatility of 3.35 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.