Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSI | $8.31 | +5.85% | 97.5M | 33.48 | $0.23 | +1.30% |
| LIN | $478.06 | -0.55% | 225.9B | 34.21 | $14.08 | +1.20% |
| SHW | $366.84 | +0.82% | 93B | 36.93 | $10.10 | +0.83% |
| ECL | $279.20 | -1.36% | 80.5B | 37.98 | $7.47 | +0.89% |
| APD | $294.87 | +0.46% | 66.6B | 42.46 | $7.05 | +2.38% |
| DD | $77.03 | +3.33% | 32.4B | 454.88 | $0.17 | +2.04% |
| PPG | $112.39 | +0.73% | 25.8B | 20.66 | $5.53 | +2.40% |
| LYB | $56.79 | +2.37% | 18.9B | 125.04 | $0.47 | +9.14% |
| IFF | $67.14 | +1.53% | 17.4B | -44.15 | -$1.54 | +2.35% |
| RPM | $125.73 | +1.12% | 16.4B | 23.84 | $5.35 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
FSI vs LIN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 225.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while LIN trades at $478.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LIN's competition here
FSI vs SHW Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SHW trades at $366.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SHW's competition here
FSI vs ECL Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ECL trades at $279.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ECL's competition here
FSI vs APD Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while APD trades at $294.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check APD's competition here
FSI vs DD Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while DD trades at $77.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 454.88. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check DD's competition here
FSI vs PPG Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while PPG trades at $112.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PPG's competition here
FSI vs LYB Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while LYB trades at $56.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 125.04. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LYB's competition here
FSI vs IFF Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while IFF trades at $67.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IFF's competition here
FSI vs RPM Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while RPM trades at $125.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check RPM's competition here
FSI vs WLK Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while WLK trades at $87.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -174.38. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check WLK's competition here
FSI vs ALB Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ALB trades at $81.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALB's competition here
FSI vs AVTR Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while AVTR trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AVTR's competition here
FSI vs EMN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while EMN trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check EMN's competition here
FSI vs NEU Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while NEU trades at $795.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NEU's competition here
FSI vs AXTA Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while AXTA trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AXTA's competition here
FSI vs SQM Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SQM trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SQM's competition here
FSI vs ALTM Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALTM's competition here
FSI vs ESI Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ESI trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ESI's competition here
FSI vs IKNX Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IKNX's competition here
FSI vs BCPC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while BCPC trades at $162.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check BCPC's competition here
FSI vs SXT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SXT trades at $113.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SXT's competition here
FSI vs CBT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CBT trades at $81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CBT's competition here
FSI vs SSL Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SSL trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SSL's competition here
FSI vs HWKN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while HWKN trades at $170.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HWKN's competition here
FSI vs AVNT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while AVNT trades at $37.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AVNT's competition here
FSI vs FUL Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while FUL trades at $61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check FUL's competition here
FSI vs WDFC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while WDFC trades at $219.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check WDFC's competition here
FSI vs LTHM Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LTHM's competition here
FSI vs PRM Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while PRM trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PRM's competition here
FSI vs OLN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while OLN trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -210.59. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check OLN's competition here
FSI vs ASH Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ASH trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ASH's competition here
FSI vs KWR Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while KWR trades at $144.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -344.98. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KWR's competition here
FSI vs CC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CC trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CC's competition here
FSI vs IOSP Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while IOSP trades at $86.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 113.14. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check IOSP's competition here
FSI vs NGVT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while NGVT trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NGVT's competition here
FSI vs MTX Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while MTX trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 6384.00. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check MTX's competition here
FSI vs PQG Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check PQG's competition here
FSI vs CCF Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CCF's competition here
FSI vs SCL Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SCL trades at $50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SCL's competition here
FSI vs ECVT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ECVT trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -76.58. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ECVT's competition here
FSI vs REX Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 987.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while REX trades at $61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check REX's competition here
FSI vs ODC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ODC trades at $58.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ODC's competition here
FSI vs KRO Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while KRO trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KRO's competition here
FSI vs OEC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while OEC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check OEC's competition here
FSI vs KOP Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while KOP trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KOP's competition here
FSI vs GPRE Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while GPRE trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GPRE's competition here
FSI vs HDSN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while HDSN trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HDSN's competition here
FSI vs GEVO Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while GEVO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GEVO's competition here
FSI vs ADUR Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ADUR trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -38.93. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ADUR's competition here
FSI vs LWLG Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while LWLG trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LWLG's competition here
FSI vs CMT Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CMT trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CMT's competition here
FSI vs TSE Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while TSE trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSE's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check TSE's competition here
FSI vs ALTO Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ALTO trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ALTO's competition here
FSI vs NTIC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while NTIC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check NTIC's competition here
FSI vs LOOP Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while LOOP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +12.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check LOOP's competition here
FSI vs VNTR Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check VNTR's competition here
FSI vs SNES Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while SNES trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check SNES's competition here
FSI vs GURE Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while GURE trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GURE's competition here
FSI vs CNEY Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CNEY trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CNEY's competition here
FSI vs DNMR Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check DNMR's competition here
FSI vs CRKN Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while CRKN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check CRKN's competition here
FSI vs HGAS Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 726.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while HGAS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HGAS's competition here
FSI vs HGASW Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check HGASW's competition here
FSI vs MOOV Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FSI has daily volatility of 12.47 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
FSI vs KRA Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check KRA's competition here
FSI vs ZY Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check ZY's competition here
FSI vs FOE Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check FOE's competition here
FSI vs AVTR-PA Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
FSI vs TREC Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check TREC's competition here
FSI vs GCP Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check GCP's competition here
FSI vs AMRS Comparison August 2025
FSI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSI stands at 97.5M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSI is priced at $8.31, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FSI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSI is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSI.Check AMRS's competition here