Ecolab Inc.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 213.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LIN trades at $452.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 120.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AIQUF trades at $208.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 119.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AIQUY trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SHW trades at $362.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 60.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while APD trades at $272.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 54.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PTCAY trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -569.18. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 45.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GVDNY trades at $98.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 45.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GVDBF trades at $4,890.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 40.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SXYAY trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SKFOF trades at $237.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 33.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AKZOY trades at $21.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 30.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NVZMY trades at $65.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 86.68. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 30.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NVZMF trades at $65.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 86.18. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 27.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DD trades at $65.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2177.33. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PPG trades at $110.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 20.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IFF trades at $79.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 83.31. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 18.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LYB trades at $56.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SYIEF trades at $119.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 16.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SYIEY trades at $29.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while EMSHF trades at $651.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NPCPF trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 14.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while RPM trades at $110.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NDEKY trades at $18.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 12.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while COVTY trades at $33.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -41.58. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NDEKF trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -39.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 10.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while EVKIY trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 10.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while EVKIF trades at $22.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while WLK trades at $78.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BNTGF trades at $67.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BNTGY trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SQM trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 9.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AKZOF trades at $55.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while EMN trades at $76.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AVTR trades at $12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SCVPY trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IMDZF trades at $127.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AXTA trades at $33.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TKKYY trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALB trades at $57.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ASGLF trades at $31.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FUPBY trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ASGLY trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KPTCY trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NEU trades at $625.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ARKAY trades at $76.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while COIHY trades at $20.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BCPC trades at $162.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while OCLDY trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ARKAF trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ESI trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while COIHF trades at $34.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MITUF trades at $24.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CBT trades at $77.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MITUY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CLZNF trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SXT trades at $93.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CLZNY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FUPEF trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AZLGF trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while WKCMF trades at $75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MBGCF trades at $17.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while WDFC trades at $231.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AVNT trades at $34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FUL trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while JMPLY trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HXPLF trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ICPVF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LNXSY trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while INCZY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LNXSF trades at $29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KPLIF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while JMPLF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HWKN trades at $119.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KSANF trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while OLN trades at $20.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ASH trades at $49.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -26.43. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IOSP trades at $92.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 64.96. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DACHF trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SSL trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SASOF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CC trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KWR trades at $99.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while OCINF trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MTX trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -67.94. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PRM trades at $10.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -265.87. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KANKF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ELKEF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NGVT trades at $35.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CSNVY trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALPKF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SCL trades at $53.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CSNVF trades at $20.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL and EMNSF have similar daily volatility (1.05).

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALZCF trades at $101.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 850.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KRO trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AECLY trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while VTXPF trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HASGF trades at $19.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 777.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ECVT trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -110.42. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DALQF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 743.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HUABF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 730.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DLNDY trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 719.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 680.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while OEC trades at $12.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 669.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while REX trades at $40.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SYHMY has a market cap of 616.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SYHMY trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SYHMY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYHMY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SYHMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 603.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 592.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ODC trades at $43.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 521.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KOP trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 427.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FPLSF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 403.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 392.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FLRAF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 354.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NOPMF trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -27.35. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 333.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 288.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HDSN trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 246.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GEVO trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 241.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GPRE trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TITMF has a market cap of 205.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TITMF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TITMF's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TITMF's ROE of -13.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TITMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DCHCF has a market cap of 201.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DCHCF trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DCHCF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DCHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to DCHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GGELU has a market cap of 199.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GGELU trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GGELU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GGELU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GGELU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, VNTRF has a market cap of 196.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while VNTRF trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas VNTRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VNTRF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to VNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ECSNF has a market cap of 181.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ECSNF trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ECSNF's P/E ratio is -155.42. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECSNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ECSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ICHMF has a market cap of 167.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ICHMF trades at $32.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ICHMF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ICHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ICHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 161.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ADUR trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NANX has a market cap of 157.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NANX trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NANX's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NANX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NANX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 151.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TSE trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 143.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CMT trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, COOSF has a market cap of 129.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while COOSF trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas COOSF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COOSF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to COOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 108.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LWLG trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KBLB has a market cap of 98.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KBLB trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KBLB's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KBLB's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to KBLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HERC has a market cap of 95.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HERC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HERC's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, YIPCF has a market cap of 93.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while YIPCF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas YIPCF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YIPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to YIPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, UNIKF has a market cap of 85.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while UNIKF trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas UNIKF's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNIKF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to UNIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BADG has a market cap of 85.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BADG trades at $4,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BADG's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BADG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to BADG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ABSSF has a market cap of 76.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ABSSF trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ABSSF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABSSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ABSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AVTXF has a market cap of 75.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AVTXF trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AVTXF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTXF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AVTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SWIOU has a market cap of 72.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SWIOU trades at $8,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SWIOU's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWIOU's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SWIOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 68.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NTIC trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 67.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALTO trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NNOMF has a market cap of 57.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NNOMF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NNOMF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NNOMF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NNOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IOFNF has a market cap of 55.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IOFNF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IOFNF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOFNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to IOFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PRMFF has a market cap of 52.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PRMFF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PRMFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to PRMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 51.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while LOOP trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GMGMF has a market cap of 50.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GMGMF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GMGMF's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMGMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GMGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 46.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FSI trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, BIOF has a market cap of 38.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while BIOF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas BIOF's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BIOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to BIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GLGI has a market cap of 35.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GLGI trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GLGI's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GLGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ITXXF has a market cap of 29.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ITXXF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ITXXF's P/E ratio is -15.71. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITXXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ITXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, STCB has a market cap of 29.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while STCB trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas STCB's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STCB's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to STCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HGCPF has a market cap of 20.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HGCPF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HGCPF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGCPF's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HGCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CANOF has a market cap of 16.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CANOF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CANOF's P/E ratio is -36.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CANOF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CANOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NNUP has a market cap of 16.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NNUP trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NNUP's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NNUP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NNUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NMGX has a market cap of 10.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NMGX trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NMGX's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NMGX's ROE of +38.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NMGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AVOA has a market cap of 10.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AVOA trades at $1,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AVOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to AVOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DTPKF has a market cap of 8.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DTPKF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DTPKF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTPKF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to DTPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AXIIF has a market cap of 8.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AXIIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AXIIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXIIF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to AXIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HDGHF has a market cap of 8.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HDGHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HDGHF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDGHF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to HDGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AUTR has a market cap of 7.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AUTR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AUTR's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AUTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AUTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GURE trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FAME has a market cap of 6.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FAME trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FAME's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FAME's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ESKNF has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ESKNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ESKNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESKNF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ESKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SNES trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TORM has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TORM trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TORM's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TORM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to TORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 3.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CRKN trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, VRSRF has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while VRSRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas VRSRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRSRF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to VRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FRXIF has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FRXIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FRXIF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FRXIF's ROE of +20.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to FRXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ILDO has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ILDO trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ILDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ILDO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ILDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HYDI has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HYDI trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HYDI's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to HYDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while DNMR trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HGAS trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CNEY trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GSPI has a market cap of 778820.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GSPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GSPI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GSPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PYMOF has a market cap of 754677.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PYMOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PYMOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PYMOF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MDRA has a market cap of 686926.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MDRA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MDRA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MDRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to MDRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, IZCFF has a market cap of 436792.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while IZCFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas IZCFF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IZCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to IZCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GPHBF has a market cap of 390684.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GPHBF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GPHBF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPHBF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GPHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ALKN has a market cap of 375739.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ALKN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ALKN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALKN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ALKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, APGMF has a market cap of 321692.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while APGMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas APGMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APGMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to APGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CBNT has a market cap of 298151.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CBNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CBNT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBNT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CBNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PVNNF has a market cap of 232379.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PVNNF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to PVNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, INTK has a market cap of 223229.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while INTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas INTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INTK's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to INTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MOPN has a market cap of 200000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MOPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MOPN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOPN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to MOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SIXWF has a market cap of 144354.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SIXWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SIXWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SIXWF's ROE of +109.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SIXWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NFTI has a market cap of 70438.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NFTI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NFTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NFTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SRGE has a market cap of 54588.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SRGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SRGE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to SRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ZENG has a market cap of 53223.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ZENG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ZENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZENG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ZENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GNPG has a market cap of 49999.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GNPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GNPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GNPG's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GNPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HYGN has a market cap of 36326.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HYGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HYGN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to HYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HYPF has a market cap of 34018.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HYPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HYPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HYPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to HYPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, COWI has a market cap of 21244.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while COWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas COWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COWI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to COWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, RNWB has a market cap of 18814.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while RNWB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RNWB's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RNWB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to RNWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FLMP has a market cap of 12780.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FLMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FLMP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLMP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FLMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CLTH has a market cap of 10073.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CLTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CLTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ENDO has a market cap of 6789.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ENDO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ENDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENDO's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ENDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, WLAB has a market cap of 6378.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while WLAB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas WLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to WLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FLKI has a market cap of 5776.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FLKI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FLKI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLKI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ACRB has a market cap of 5606.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ACRB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ACRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ACRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NTCHF has a market cap of 4807.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NTCHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NTCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to NTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, RNWF has a market cap of 3878.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while RNWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RNWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RNWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to RNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SVXA has a market cap of 3661.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SVXA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SVXA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVXA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SVXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ETCK has a market cap of 3638.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ETCK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ETCK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ETCK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ETCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CCGY has a market cap of 3151.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CCGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CCGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CCGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, SEVT has a market cap of 3054.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while SEVT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas SEVT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to SEVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GELV has a market cap of 2842.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GELV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GELV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GELV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GELV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CLKTF has a market cap of 2009.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CLKTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CLKTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLKTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to CLKTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ECL has daily volatility of 1.05 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, NWGN has a market cap of 67.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while NWGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas NWGN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to NWGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, JSCPY has a market cap of 51.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while JSCPY trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas JSCPY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JSCPY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to JSCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GTBT has a market cap of 47.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GTBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GTBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GAEC has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GAEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GAEC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GAEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to GAEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ESPID comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ESPID trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ESPID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESPID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ESPID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, CXDC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while CXDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas CXDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CXDC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to CXDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, TREC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, UETH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while UETH trades at $26.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas UETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UETH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to UETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KOGL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KOGL trades at $57.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KOGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to KOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ACEEU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ACEEU trades at $5,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ACEEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACEEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to ACEEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ESPI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ESPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ESPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESPI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ESPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, RDSMY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while RDSMY trades at $33.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas RDSMY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RDSMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to RDSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, KRA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GLYE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GLYE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GLYE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PTBBU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PTBBU trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PTBBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTBBU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to PTBBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, PARPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while PARPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas PARPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PARPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to PARPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, GCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AMRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, ZY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, FOE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.

ECL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ECL stands at 72.34B. In comparison, AVTR-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ECL is priced at $255.04, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ECL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.61, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ECL's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ECL is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECL.