The Chemours Company
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CC
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CC
The Chemours Company (CC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | $21.45 | -0.33% | 3.2B | -8.39 | -$2.57 | +1.62% |
| LIN | $497.73 | +0.79% | 232.9B | 34.38 | $14.62 | +1.21% |
| SHW | $317.58 | -2.49% | 78.8B | 30.99 | $10.26 | +1.00% |
| ECL | $265.08 | -1.66% | 74.6B | 36.35 | $7.27 | +1.04% |
| APD | $292.25 | +0.97% | 65.4B | -198.34 | -$1.48 | +2.45% |
| LYB | $77.39 | +0.89% | 25.6B | -32.09 | -$2.48 | +6.03% |
| SQM | $80.70 | -1.37% | 23.8B | 40.39 | $2.06 | +0.14% |
| PPG | $103.44 | -2.85% | 23.1B | 14.92 | $6.92 | +2.72% |
| ALB | $171.37 | -3.98% | 21B | -30.92 | -$5.76 | +0.91% |
| DD | $45.14 | -2.33% | 19.1B | 216.52 | $0.21 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
CC vs LIN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 232.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while LIN trades at $497.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LIN's competition here
CC vs SHW Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SHW trades at $317.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SHW's competition here
CC vs ECL Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ECL trades at $265.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECL's competition here
CC vs APD Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while APD trades at $292.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas APD's P/E ratio is -198.34. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to APD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check APD's competition here
CC vs LYB Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while LYB trades at $77.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is -32.09. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LYB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LYB's competition here
CC vs SQM Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SQM trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SQM's competition here
CC vs PPG Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while PPG trades at $103.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PPG's competition here
CC vs ALB Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ALB trades at $171.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -30.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALB's competition here
CC vs DD Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while DD trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 216.52. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check DD's competition here
CC vs IFF Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while IFF trades at $71.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -51.37. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IFF's competition here
CC vs WLK Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while WLK trades at $117.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WLK's competition here
CC vs RPM Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while RPM trades at $96.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check RPM's competition here
CC vs SOLS Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SOLS trades at $77.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SOLS's competition here
CC vs EMN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while EMN trades at $72.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check EMN's competition here
CC vs ESI Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ESI trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ESI's competition here
CC vs SSL Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SSL trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SSL's competition here
CC vs ALTM Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTM's competition here
CC vs NEU Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while NEU trades at $642.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NEU's competition here
CC vs IKNX Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IKNX's competition here
CC vs AXTA Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while AXTA trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AXTA's competition here
CC vs BCPC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while BCPC trades at $169.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check BCPC's competition here
CC vs CBT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while CBT trades at $74.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CBT's competition here
CC vs SXT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SXT trades at $92.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SXT's competition here
CC vs PRM Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while PRM trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PRM's competition here
CC vs FUL Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while FUL trades at $58.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FUL's competition here
CC vs OLN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while OLN trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -32.47. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OLN's competition here
CC vs AVNT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while AVNT trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVNT's competition here
CC vs HWKN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while HWKN trades at $151.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HWKN's competition here
CC vs LTHM Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LTHM's competition here
CC vs WDFC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while WDFC trades at $211.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check WDFC's competition here
CC vs NGVT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while NGVT trades at $70.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -17.13. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NGVT's competition here
CC vs ASH Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ASH trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ASH's competition here
CC vs MTX Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while MTX trades at $67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -117.46. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check MTX's competition here
CC vs KWR Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while KWR trades at $116.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is -861.21. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KWR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KWR's competition here
CC vs PQG Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check PQG's competition here
CC vs IOSP Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while IOSP trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check IOSP's competition here
CC vs REX Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while REX trades at $45.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check REX's competition here
CC vs ECVT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ECVT trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 260.80. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ECVT's competition here
CC vs CCF Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CCF's competition here
CC vs GPRE Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while GPRE trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GPRE's competition here
CC vs LWLG Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while LWLG trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -47.87. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LWLG's competition here
CC vs SCL Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SCL trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SCL's competition here
CC vs ODC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 940.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ODC trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ODC's competition here
CC vs KRO Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 732.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while KRO trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRO's competition here
CC vs KOP Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 732.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while KOP trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KOP's competition here
CC vs GEVO Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while GEVO trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GEVO's competition here
CC vs ALTO Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ALTO trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ALTO's competition here
CC vs OEC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 356.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while OEC trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check OEC's competition here
CC vs ADUR Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ADUR trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ADUR's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ADUR's competition here
CC vs HDSN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while HDSN trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HDSN's competition here
CC vs CMT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while CMT trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CMT's competition here
CC vs NTIC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while NTIC trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -264.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check NTIC's competition here
CC vs LOOP Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while LOOP trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check LOOP's competition here
CC vs FSI Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while FSI trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FSI's competition here
CC vs VNTR Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check VNTR's competition here
CC vs GURE Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while GURE trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GURE's competition here
CC vs SNES Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while SNES trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check SNES's competition here
CC vs YMAT Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while YMAT trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check YMAT's competition here
CC vs TSE Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TSE's competition here
CC vs CNEY Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while CNEY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CNEY's competition here
CC vs DNMR Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check DNMR's competition here
CC vs CRKN Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check CRKN's competition here
CC vs HGAS Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 200.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while HGAS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HGAS's competition here
CC vs HGASW Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 7.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check HGASW's competition here
CC vs MOOV Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CC has daily volatility of 4.09 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
CC vs AMRS Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AMRS's competition here
CC vs ARG Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ARG's competition here
CC vs KRA Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KRA's competition here
CC vs KMG Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while KMG trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check KMG's competition here
CC vs ZY Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check ZY's competition here
CC vs GCP Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check GCP's competition here
CC vs FOE Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check FOE's competition here
CC vs AVTR-PA Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
CC vs TREC Comparison April 2026
CC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CC stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CC is priced at $21.45, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CC currently has a P/E ratio of -8.39, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CC is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CC.Check TREC's competition here